Really makes you think

...

If they included the same number of each then the sample would be biased dumbass.

And how so is that?

If you forced the poll along a 50/50 split reps/dems, how would that tell you anything about the election? Each candidate would get 50% and it wouldn't predict anything.

As in biased against HRC

...

If you took a poll of majority democrats, the democratic candidate would pull the majority, it wouldn't predict anything.

Except in this election people from both sides have said they are voting for the other candidate because of x y z

How delusional are you? Jesus fuck.
Even dems hate clinton, even if it were 50/50 trump would be significantly up.
There is no way dem turnout this year will be higher than the republicans. If anything the sample sizes should be switched, would be a more accurate presentation.

>If they included the same number of each then the sample would be biased dumbass.

>Poll samples more dems then reps
>Hurrrr guys if they sampled the same number from each party it would be biased against the democrats.

This is why your whole leftist cult is going the way of the dinosaurs.

trump isn't grabbing many dems; he's getting more independents. If you move the Inds into his column you get an almost even split, with hillary in a slight lead.

There's less Republicans than Democrats

You are astoundingly oblivious.

the poll sampled more democrats because there are more democrats in america

These sample ratios are based on 2012 turn-out which was exceptionally high for the Dems. Hillary's unfavorability ratings are sky high compared to Obama. That is one of the huge underlying flaws of the vast majority of political polls, and that is why Trump will win. All the polls are fundamentally based on the idea tht turn-out in 2016 will look like turn-out in 2012. Trump is bringing in new voters.

>with hillary in a slight lead.

Wrong, maybe in the past.
But for 2015/16 people leaning republican have fully fledged their partisan. 42% republicans to 41% dems.

Precisely.

This poll makes no assumptions in that regard, that is part of the questionnaire (the difference between registered and likely voters would give you that info).

Unfortunately the image doesn't give a breakdown of who is likely or unlikely. If the poll showed more democrats unlikely to vote, what you stated would be correct.

You still don't get it do you...

You can argue about R's and D's all day but that percentage of I's is fucking atrocious and you're a fucking shill or a retard if you think otherwise.

>Likely voters
One more reason the polls are skewed. Likely voter is someone who hasn't voted in the last two elections.

Good point. Trump is well up with independents, comfy.