I'm putting together a crew

I'm putting together a crew

Attached: 1499260435474.jpg (740x444, 81K)

Jesus Christ what is wrong with brits? I assume that since this is a movie, those are their 10/10, holy fuck it’s like a circus

daniel radcliffe is aesthetic as fuck (though he is a huge manlet)

In one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises.

Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: hp.jpg (1578x2842, 1.37M)

Luna is a cute, user.

we are not as shallow and brainwashed as americans so our movies are allowed to have ordinary looking people in them

Wait till you see she looks now, those britbong genes have kicked in

You LIE

*blocks your path*

Attached: elizabeth_hurley_bedazzled_2.webm (1280x720, 1.6M)

Looks like she just waxed a mustache off

>I'm putting together a crew
>It'll be known as the DA
>"DEH!" Army

wasn't she something

>Not Dullest Army

>aesthetic
>deformed looking jew midget

Attached: Daniel_Radcliffe_2127843b.jpg (747x648, 151K)

>tfw the supermodel-tier pretty women that 99% percent of guys go for look totally same-y and uninteresting to me
>tfw only truly attracted to girls that look kinda weird

not maisie williams though that bitch is in another fucking league of ugly

Attached: 1489541869295.jpg (785x644, 51K)

looks like a man/tranny

Same here. I prefer women who look slightly weird over supermodels for two reasons: they tend to be more interesting, and, more importantly, they're attainable

Line? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight some villains has been very similar to each other, but still they're okay. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series has some consistencies, some of which are the great worldbuilding but lackluster depth in its characters. Or maybe it does have depth and I'm just misremembering...

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; although, perhaps not. I can see how one could think she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. It could make sense. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly not the anti alzheimer's movie it was marketed as, because I can't remember a thing. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, uhhhh

>a-at least the books were good though
"Perhaps"
The writing was decent; the book was alright. As I read, I noticed that every time the author wrote "he who should not be named", she was referring to Voldemort.

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I don't know why I did it in the first place. Rowling's mind is so filled with average ideas because she is an average person, it's what makes her success story so inspiring. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by uh, I think it started with a C?. Anyway, they wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." I don't see a correlation between Harry Potter and Stephen King, but okay. "When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King", just doesn't make sense to me.

I can never recognize Amber Heard. Her face has no uniquely identifying features. She's pretty, but so generically pretty that it's unattractive.

shit taste, user

Attached: 342789437294.jpg (612x612, 94K)

THIS SUMMER

YOU
WILL
STRETCH
YOUR
LEGS

Attached: 342973274932.jpg (500x623, 73K)

Is that what Cho looks like these days? Nice

Why is Harry's tie askew or tied incorrectly literally 100% of the time? He wears one every fucking day. Is he so delightfully gawky that he never gets it right, not even by pure happenstance?

she's a cute. Harry fucked up bad.

Attached: 3472947274221779813.jpg (640x640, 120K)

When you're forced to wear a uniform in school you'll do anything to stand out even a tiny bit

Hermoine needed bigger boobs

Attached: episode-18-air-date-05012004-pictured-lidsay-lohan-hermione-rachel-picture-id138441437[1].jpg (1024x667, 412K)

>tfw conventionally attractive girls usually don't attract me
>tfw usually go for horse-teethed/man-jawed/odd-faced girls
what gives

Laziest opening I've seen yet.

Couldn't witches conjure themselves bigger boobs if they wanted to? Hermione used magic to fix her hair and teeth in the books.

>Ordinary
>We aren't shallow like Americans so it's okay if they cast the ugliest fucking people on Earth, because they look like the rest of us.
Jeeeeezus

Dehest dehs deh dehe dehy deh dehie dehs. Deh deh dehing deh deh dehard deh deh dehs deh Dehwarts Dehdemy deh dehey deh dehed dehs deh deh indehable deh deh dehs. Deh deh deh dehy dehery, deh dehs’ deh dehency deh deh dehs deh deh dehment deh indehive deh deh dehial dehs, deh deh deh dehic undehical, deh deh dehtion deh indeh.

Dehs deh deh deh deh deh Dehling dehed deh deh deh Dehlberg dehing deh dehs; deh deh deh deh dehs deh deher deh dehen deh deh deh deh deh deh deht dehthing deh dehbody?deh dehusly dehable deh-dehtion deh deh dehs. Deh Dehry Dehher dehs deh deh anti-Dehtian (deh deh), deh deh’s dehly deh anti-Dehes Dehnd dehs deh dehs deh deh deh, dehty deh dehment. Deh deh dehs deh deh deh deh. Deh, dehfully, deh deh deher deh deh.

>d-deh dehst deh dehs deh deh dehough d-deh
"Deh!"
Deh dehing deh dehful; deh deh deh dehble. Deh deh deh, Deh dehed deh dehry deh deh deher deh deh deh deh, deh dehor deh dehtead deh deh deher "dehed deh dehs."

Deh deh dehing deh deh deh deh deh deh dehry deh deh deh deh dehed. Deh dehed deh deh Deh deh dehed deh deh dehal deh dehs. Deh deh dehlous. Dehling's deh dehs deh dehed deh dehes deh deh dehs deh deh deh deh deh deh deh dehing. Deh Deh deh deh dehish, dehing deh deh Dehry Dehher deh deh deh Dehphen Dehng. Deh deh dehthing deh deh dehect deh, "Deh dehse dehs deh dehing Dehry Dehher deh dehdeh deh dehdeh, deh deh deh deh deher deh deh deh deh deh deh Dehphen Dehng." Deh deh deh deh dehght. Deh deh deh dehing dehic. Deh deh deh "Dehry Dehher" deh deh, deh deh, dehed deh deh Dehphen Dehng.

Attached: deh-tier.jpg (1623x2886, 1.28M)