"hur lemme just split my soul into 8 parts not into like a trillion and make it so one the Horcruxes is literally...

>"hur lemme just split my soul into 8 parts not into like a trillion and make it so one the Horcruxes is literally myself or every single person alive or puppies or the Earth itself"
What the FUCK was his problem?

Attached: voldemort1.jpg (980x490, 39K)

He was created by a roastie.

Can somebody explain the "deh!" Meme to me

In Order of the Phoenix there's a funny moment where he appears on screen for half a second floating in smoke and he says "deh!"

Female in charge of writing fantasy

>Hurrdurr why didn't he just make a million of them
Because his soul becames more fragmented and he becomes less of himself. He didn't want to become a blob, he wanted to powerful, immortal, and himself
>Hurrp why didn't he send a horcrux into space
Because his soul is attached to it, and its needed to bring him back. If he send shit into space and died he'd just be floating around space as a dumb ghost
>Hurr why did he make random objects into his horcruxes why special shit
Because the power of the horcrux is based on the object,powerful magical objects make for stronger horcruxes.

Its not like Harry Potter is fine fucking art but at least try and follow the plot. Its like you've only watched the flicks and not read the books.
>Hurr but why would I read the books they are shit
Because otherwise you just come off as a retard. Don't claim plot holes when you're so retarded you can't even read babies first book series.

Actually it's explained, retards. Each time you split your soul, you lose some of your humanity. That's why Voldemort has a snake face. In fact, I think Slughorn mentions in the books ("No!") that your soul would become unstable and you'd die if you split it too many times.

>actually unironically wasting your time reading Harry Potter
OH NO NO NO NO

>he didn't have the joy of reading Harry Potter as a child/young teen
Retard

they literally say that you can't make too many horcruxes

and it makes sense voldemort wouldn't want to risk splitting his soul more if it could affect his power as he was pretty arrogant, the horcruxes were a back up plan

>Implying
The first book came out in 1997, I read them as a kid.

>Power of the Horcrux is based on the object
Completely false and never stated it the books or films. He had serious hubris and chose those as his vessles because they were "special" like him. You're right about everything else.

Imagine FUCKING Hermione

wow

I don't know about the movies, but in the book there's an explanation for this and it has to do with Riddle seeing himself as a big deal. He not only splits his soul into a certain number of pieces that are significant, he also splits it between items of great importance to Hogwarts like the diadem, as well as other stuff that's significant in some way. Sure it would be smarter to not do that but part of his character is his arrogance; he doesn't think it will matter.

Become the horcrux of one of your horcruxes, guaranteeing immortality for both of you.

He split himself in seven parts because it's a magical number.
He's also a HUGE LARPer about magic stuff.

Oops, you're right. It was infact..

>While a Horcrux could be anything at all, including a living being, it was most advisable to create a Horcrux out of an inanimate object to decrease the chances of it being destroyed.
If Voldamort had made them out of empty chip wrappers Harry could have just tossed them in a fire.

All of the day bro

>Bragging that you're either so uneducated that you didn't read as a child, or you're a kid who didn't grow up with the books
lmao either way fuck off

Are you truly looking for logic from the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises written for people whose imaginative lives are confined to TV cartoons, and the exaggerated (more exciting, not threatening) mirror-worlds of soaps, reality TV and celebrity gossip?
Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1520551391803.jpg (1560x2872, 1.26M)

It's not their fault their parents didn't love them enough to give them good books or literature

Attached: 1466016618123.jpg (900x1200, 362K)

>Brothers Karmazov
>good
You are fucking dead

HAHAAHHAAHA
not him but you can't be serious
are you seriously bragging about reading Harry Potter at a young age?

>harry potter makes you educated
holy shit no wonder tumblr cancer from Sup Forums spams this garbage here after being made insecure by /lit/

>my boy clifford is nowhere in sight
At least use the right image to accompany your stale pasta

Attached: 1518867425197.jpg (1565x2823, 558K)

When you're so hard trying to be contrarian you end up just being a big dumbo

Attached: 1507454310027.png (623x450, 36K)

>ask retarded questions
>get answers

>HURRRRRRRR LOOK AT THIS FAGGOT HE KNOWS THE ANSWERS

Attached: 1515846173967.jpg (645x729, 81K)

>ACTUALLY UNIRONICALLY READING HARRY POTTER

OH

NO

NO

NO

NO

Attached: 1318381777991.jpg (521x579, 31K)