Incredibles/Pixar Thread

when the FUCK are we getting a teaser? It's out in 8 months

After this years capeshits have all been released.

Coco has to come out first

I reeeeeaaaally hope this sequel will be worth it

I think it'll be on Parr

Monsters University, Cars 3 and Finding Dory were all mediocre to terrible. I have zero faith in Pixar's ability to make sequels anymore.

I 100 fucking percent guarantee theyll have some cringy jab at "hurrr hurrr Drumpf rump pumpf XD right guys?"

I don't have faith in Pixar, I have faith in Brad Bird

>monsters univereity wasn't by the same director or writers
>cars was shit from the start
>finding dory was a bad premise
meanwhile incredibles 2 is still written and directed by brad bird, by the same producer, with the same cast and will still be composed by giaccino. so i have some faith

i highly doubt it, since it's been in production long before drumpf

Remind me, did they or did they not confirm already that this film won't be the plot of the Underminer game?

Finding Dory was written and directed by the same guy, with the same cast and its soundtrack was still composed by Thomas Newman.

It was a clunky, overly juvenile mess with atrocious writing and none of the scope, wit or majesty the first one had.

So having the same people on board is not a guarantee of quality.

It's completely different, Elastigirl is the protagonist and the poster seems to imply Underminer's a small role.

>Elastigirl is the protagonist
FUCK.

The Incredibles 2 teaser is the only reason I've been hyped up for not-Book of Life's release

>Elastigirl is the protagonist and the poster seems to imply Underminer's a small role.
There's a poster? How have I not heard of this?

Id imagine February

...

...

>will still be composed by giaccino
The soundtracks to UP and The Incredibles were fantastic, but everything else he's done that I've heard is pretty bland. How that even possible?

They better not have reduced the size of elastigirls ass

I knew about this but I thought it was just generic concept art from the first film with the new logo slapper on to tide us over till we see substantial new info / a trailer.

>tfw they make Helen thicker and give Violet a side order of thick too

...

>not liking Inside Out's soundtrack
Okay, user. It's not like it was the BEST THING about that movie

>jack jack still a baby

dropped

Nice try, Sup Forums. This only makes the sequel that much more exciting

you're pretty late, they said awhile ago it takes place the minute the first one ends.

Makes sense. The first film was about Bob.

No idea but im sure it won't be as good as the first one. There hasn't been a single good animated movie since Lego in 2014

How is that Sup Forums autist

Likely just to set up the cast and get the mandatory Ratzenberg cameo out of the way, then there will be a time-skip to where the actual plot begins.

the plot may follow the videogame that came out has the undertaker and a pretty straightforward story.

Seemed like was implying a female lead would automatically be a bad thing, when instead, it changes up the sequel's dynamic, story-wise.

you're delusional. a time skip would require effort and creativity, pixar doesn't have enough of that

How creative do you have to be to just jump a month or two ahead of Underminer's attack, mention in passing that the heroes won, and move on?

>undertaker

>Thinking the soundtrack to LOST is bland
Do you have brain damage?

why do a timeskip if it's just a few months?

...

I haven't seen lost, user.
>everything that I'VE HEARD

nah. they already talked about how most of the movie has bob babysitting jack-jack after the events of the first movie. showed a clip of it iirc at d23.

You're imagining scenarios where you are persecuted and then getting offended by that imaginary scenario.

Seek help. Sincerely.

ITT

Immediate sequel with no timeskip. It fucking sucks.

so what are doing now that even disney ran out of fresh ideas?

>most of the movie has bob babysitting jack-jack
Really? For what fucking purpose?
What a fucking waste.of TWO characters.
They better form some sort of father-son crime fighting duo during the movie or else I'm not watching this crap.

They're going to de-sexualize her

you and I both know it

If everyone can see the teaser, no one can.

>Jurassic World
>Bland

Hol' on, black man. If you listen closely to some of the tracks you can hear cues from the Lost World game he did back in 1997.

>60's stressed out housewife
>shaved crotch

Yeah fucking right

Why so many faggots hate the bush? Bunch of repressed little-girl lovers, I swear...

dont worry, they'll rewrite the movie at the very last minute everythig will be fine

Hey! I'm not repressed. I was just thinking how much I wish that were Violet.

>Mary Poppins Returns
>The Dark Poppins
>The Dark Poppins Rises

>Raccoon
???

I chuckled

literally 1 of these (maybe 2 depending on the untitled disneytoon film) is a completely original work

yikes

>forgetting

>I'm Marry Poppins Y'all!

I'd watch it

it's Planes in Space (about an Evil Shuttle)

>Coco
>Original

The only reall difference is it's a musical, the overal plot is same.

I'm pretty sure Coco isn't a Mexican-flavored adaptation of a Greek Myth that ends on an elaborate fight with banditos.

It's from like one scene of the movie, iirc Jack-Jack attacks it with his powers. Might be a recurring gag with the Bob and Jack-Jack scenes.

Not that user, but the first movie arguably focused on Helen for at least half the movie.
Why do it again?

Also, enough of your Sup Forums bogeyman. Just because people think differently (or politically incorrect) doesn't mean it's the fault of Sup Forums.

>You merely adopted the spoonful of sugar. I was born in it, molded by it.

I thought Finding Dory was better than Finding Nemo.

No, it goes Poppins Returns, Poppins Forever, then Poppins and Bert, which is so bad it gets rebooted as Poppins Begins. THEN we get to Dark Poppins.

And let's not forget the adult parody Merry Poppin' Cherries.

And the sequel Poppin Merry's Cherry

IF THERE ARE NO JIGGLE PHYSICS IN THIS MOVIE, SO HELP ME I WILL SHIT ALL OVER

carlos pls leave

Which one? They're all not original works

(You)

This.
My concern is Disney turns this into an attempt at another "so many superheroes, buy the toys" franchise.

it's going to get delayed

>Underminer drill

So who is going to be the movie's main villain?

I don't think he'd be enough for a whole sequel.

My money's on Xerek, who would have been the main villain of the first film had Syndrome not proved more popular with Pixar.

It's actually 1970s

damn, whats this guys story?

Don't know. He never got past the concept stage.

They retooled him for use in The Incredibles comics. Was a Luthor/Blofeld type that got hit by some extreme case of accelerated aging from some encounter in the past. Used to date Elastigirl. Backstory wasn't entirely explained because it was being saved for flashbacks in the final story arc that was cancelled because Disney took the Pixar licenses away from Boom when they bought Marvel. The artist posted some inks from the flashback scene showing Bob rescuing Helen from Xerek's lab, as if he was more interested in her for experiment reasons, so the aftermath of that rescue probably fucked up his aging rate.

i've masturbated to this scene

>Drumpf
kys libtard

... yeah, but Incredibles was also before Disney acquired Pixar and started digging its fucking claws into every aspect of production.

There is still gigantic

Nope. It was cancelled.

Wait what?
FUCK. I was really looking firward to that one.

>Mary Poppins walks into the childrens' room and sees it is a mess.
Ya seeeee... in every joooob that must be done, there is an element of fun... you fiiiiind the fun aaaaand - SNAP!
>Breaks Michael's neck

...

>Ya seeeee... in every joooob that must be done, there is an element of fun... you fiiiiind the fun aaaaand - SNAP!

>Ya seeeee... in every joooob that must be done, there is an element of fun... you fiiiiind the fun aaaaand - SNAP!

I hope they'll subtly reference shadman, with a scene of everyone leaving the house but Helen, and violet nowhere to be seen or some shit

same difference, lots of bush
why is there so little elastigirl porn with bush?

>why is there so little elastigirl porn with bush?
>why is there so little elastigirl porn

There's barely any good porn of her *at all* so far. So why does this surprise you?

For a character who's canonically capable of fucking basically anything I have no idea how this turned out this way.

That's what happens when your daughter is best girl.

I'm actually somewhat worried how tight the information is on this. Pixar does have a lot riding on the quality of this, if it's bad than they won't have much of a reputation left.

And you are wrong.

It's kind of beautifully ironic that almost all of Disney Animation's recent output (Zootopia, Moana etc) has been categorically superior, especially in terms of writing, to Pixar's (Cars 3, Finding Dory). Like, seriously. Whoever's currently doing the screenwriting at Pixar needs to be axed. The scripts for Dory and Cars 3 were beyond terrible, and Inside Out was full of sickeningly twee cheese as well.

Kind of a total reverse of the early 2000s where DAS couldn't get a foot in the door while Pixar was ruling the roost.

Still surprised next to nothing from the D23 event was posted. They showed the updated models, so I thought by now it would be online.

>I have faith in Brad Bird
Tomorrowland

Definitely sounds like it could be used for an Incredibles 2 story with how Elastigirl is the focus. Would be neat.