Ravenclaw? Hufflepuff?

Ravenclaw? Hufflepuff?

Never heard of them.

Attached: jkrowling.png (448x384, 395K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RSk0NqQRwjg
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Bump this

Mommy!

>I'll put the main characters in Gryffindor and the bullies in Slytherin
>Oh better put one or two secondary characters in Ravenclaw for representation
>What d'you mean there's a fourth house?

imagine rubbing your taint across that smug face of hers

I will haven't spend a single years in for the dullest franchises on a history for movie franchises. Every episode the follows the boy wizard and he is a pals originated Hogwarts Academy to those fought assorted villains is achieved indistinguishably from others. Aside of gloomy the imagery, series’ only consistensiness is achieved its have empty of for excitement and ineffective used for special affect, everyone to create magic unmagical, to create active seem inert.

The perhaps die were cast what time Rowling the vetoed idea for Spielborg the directing series; herself make sure a series will always only be mistaken of that worked for art this mean anything to anybody? just ridiculously profitablely cross-promotion of woman of books. The Harry Ponter series might be anti-Christoph (or don't), prevent it’s the certainly anti-Jim Bond series on its refusal for wonder, beauty and excitement. Don't individual wants to face this fact. Currently, thankfully, those don't longer take to.

>a-at the least a books was good though r-right
"Now!"
The writing are the dreadful; book were terribly. To myself read, I notice this each anytime that character go of that the walked, author write instead the this character "stretched he is a legs. "

Myself begin marketing the in backward for an envelope each anytime this phrase were repeat. Myself stop only after having the mark envelope several dozen times. Myself were incredulous. Rowling mind is then governed by cliches and die metaphors this herself is don't other style for writing. Later myself read that lavish, loving reviewed for Harry Ponter the by same Stephen Keng. Himself write one thing the to effect for, "if these kids am reading Harry Ponter upon 11 or 12, then what time those have older those would do went with in to read Stephen Keng." And himself were quiet right. His were don't being ironic. What time you are a read "Harry Ponter" you are am, on fact, trained to read Stephen Keng.

Attached: 9BBD473C-7673-47E6-BE98-A9C2997EA9BD.png (1596x2850, 3.47M)

What's that rule about languages where the amount of times a group is mentioned is halved as you go down the list?
>Gryffindor 100 times
>Slytherin 50 times
>Ravenclaw 25 times
>Hufflepuff 12 times

Make America muggle again. Trump is a worse enemy than Voldemort.

hufflepuff is literally a house for irrelevant pussies. thats their schtick

>Hufflepuff is the most inclusive among the four houses; valuing hard work, dedication, patience, loyalty, and fair play rather than a particular aptitude in its members.

Who's dick did she suck to get the gig to write those books?

>who's

Would've liked to have at least one notable character from Hufflepuff to show up though just to get a feel for the place. Cedric doesn't count because he completely contradicts the theme of Hufflepuff (handsome and popular guy everyone knows, every girls wants his cock and he's great at sports and academics)

Rowling should've stuck with her original plan to put everyone in a different house, Harry in Slytherin, Ron in Gryffindor, Hermione in Ravenclaw, Neville in Hufflepuff, but she was too lazy to come up with reasons for them to meet up if they weren't in the same house

I thought it was Ron that was supposed to be Slytherin? That's why he's a complete prick sometimes.

Cedric Diggory was a Hufflepuff.

Hufflepuff often has group _________

Pretty sure it was Harry, she kept that idea in though with the hat originally wanting to place him there and the whole heir thing in the second book. Ron was always gonna be Gryffindor

Attached: 1494895037009.png (460x513, 122K)

>I never said hermione was white
>literally describes her as having a white face in one section

What did she mean by this?

Queen of virtue signaling, she's been called out on it numerous times too.

It meant ten million retweets and admiration from SJWs around the world at the expense of not having any respect for her own work.

I wonder what kind of younger guy would she date...

Desperation to remain relevant. It's almost sad how she can't bring herself to let her work fade graciously into classics - she has to keep talking about it, even if it means butchering them.

What's her endgame?

Attached: DW9DDDSWAAA3OEV.jpg (1200x1200, 158K)

Where did you get this?

Jesus christ...

>Gryffindor took in the brave
>Slytherin took in the most cunning and pure-blooded
>Ravenclaw took the sharpest minds
>Hufflepuff took the rest
lmao

That's not her.

I remember after the last book came out she said she'd never write more Harry Potter, and that that chapter of her life was now over. 11 years later and she's tweeting new things and changing established lore, we've got a two-part theatre play, four Potter-related books with additional information, a website where she posts new writing, and a five-part spin-off film series for which she writes the scripts.

What the fuck happened? It's not money she's worried about, she's the richest woman on the planet.

The Rothchild Daughters want a word.

>Desperation to remain relevant
She wants attention. Nothing more. All women craved that from the bottom of their hearts. And she's what, fifty? How else can she get it outside her books and admittedly quite nice, but sagging boobs?

True I guess, but they got that money by being born, at least Rowling worked for it (and got a bit lucky as well)

Damn Rowling looked like THAT?

>jk is a redhead
>ginny is a coalburner
>still marries the protagonist

yeah that's not subtle at all jk.

Attached: 1403290045124.jpg (500x281, 77K)

>hey, i have an idea
>let's put ALL of the conniving, conspiratorial, backstabbing sons and daughters of actual death cult members into the same living quarters
>also make sure they have complete privacy from the other houses

Attached: 1516389234517.jpg (512x512, 43K)

I don't even give a fuck about that single line. What annoys me the most is that she probably would have sat in on the initial audition panels for the movie and given Watson either the go head or not when she was first cast.

On top of that, she must of had some input in the design of the book covers that shows Hermione as a white girl.

Unless shown/stated elsewhere that I don't know about, here's the first time Hermione is show in a picture back in 1999 for PoA. This cover was the original UK children's edition that the publishers printed. While I don't know anything about authors and publishing, I'm damn sure she would have given some input to the design of her book.

Attached: 9780747542155.jpg (420x641, 268K)

A simple "this is theatre, in this adaptation she's black, deal with it cunts" would have been so much more honest. Most everybody would have moved on with their lives.

Somebody Deh

Base the "now!" posting

Of course she had input on the casting and the book covers, Hermione was obviously always white. When they held the auditions for the first film they most likely put white ethnicity in the description as well.

It's typical Rowling duplicitousness. She found a laughably weak loophole she could use to say it was never stated Hermione was white. That way she could plug the play and appear good on social media at the same time.

Somebody post the /lit/ pasta. You know the one.

Ernie is Hufflepuff right?

All he does is accuse Harry of being behind the Basilisk thing, then later he becomes a prefect, and he gets four lines of dialogue in seven books. Hardly a notable character

Do you like mommy's boobs, son?

Attached: rowling-736016.jpg (590x350, 45K)

my mind is full of fuck

Be honest Sup Forums, have you ever fapped to JKR?

I don't fap to anything other than porn anymore. It's sad desu.

>Most everybody would have moved on with their lives.
Most everybody did

Attached: say that to my face and not over subspace.png (404x534, 114K)

Debating it right now, her hands in the op got me hard.

I'm doing it right now. Google has a lot of pictures of her cleavage. She loves her cleavage.

no, but now I'm thinking about it... post some pics desu

Newt Scamander is from Hufflepuff.

She played that one very weird I thought. She would've gotten more respect from ethnic minorities and SJWs if she just said there's nothing wrong with it and that anybody could play Hermione regardless of ethnicity or background. People would've loved her for being pro-diversity.
But instead she autisticaly looked up a line from one of the books and shamelessly pretended she had always left Hermione's skin colour ambiguous, like she planned it from the start.

youtube.com/watch?v=RSk0NqQRwjg

didn't the author literally say that? its so tiresome

Newt was added retroactively though, I was talking about how in the books there was no real Hufflepuff presence apart from Cedric who was introduced and killed off in a single book and felt more like a Gryffindor anyway. It's good that she's made an old Hufflepuff the MC in a spin-off franchise though

Attached: 3457743027.jpg (970x545, 82K)

There were no prominent Ravenclaws and Hufflepuffs in the books because Harry was a jock who hated associating with losers. He only liked Cho because of that 10/10 asian pussy and only came to almost respect Luna when she risked her life for him. The thought of talking to Hufflepuff never ever crossed his mind.

Attached: 1239606399515.jpg (827x1200, 300K)

If anything, Harry was the loser for most of the books, the guy really didn't know how to use his celebrity status to good effect. He could've been the hottest thing in Hogwarts but he chose to hang out with ginger poor kid #7 and a shaggy muggleborn know-it-all. Seriously, imagine how different his life at school would've been if he accepted Malfoy's handshake back then.

Why does Rowling never expand on any of the lore she creates? There isn't even a layout of what Hogwarts is supposed to look like

every time

Without going into an autistic discussion about wish-fulfillment, I'll tell you that yes, while being a loser himself, Harry was aware of other losers and he didn't exactly like them. Read the chapter 'Luna Lovegood' of The Order of Phoenix again. Harry laments Cho Chang finds him seating with people SUCH AS Neville Longbottom and Loony Lovegood.

>Seriously, imagine how different his life at school would've been if he accepted Malfoy's handshake back then.

So, is Malfoy a chad?

No I remember that, Harry knew about social hierarchy and everything. He wasn't bottom of the barrel, there were people beneath him, but he wasn't exactly a chad.

As for that scene you're describing yeah, he didn't know Luna yet and rightly thought she was weird as hell, and Neville wasn't popular in any sense. But I think the thing he was most worried about when Cho saw him was the fact he was covered in disgusting smelly cactus goo, not so much the people he was sitting next to.

I don't know what this thread is for but I'm a ravenclaw...

Daily reminder that:
>Harry is true Slytherin
>Hermione is true Ravenclaw
>Ron is true Hufflepuff
>Neville is true Gryffindor.

>couldn’t come up with a way of them regularly meeting
>despite writing in common rooms
Just have an all inclusive common room like plenty of schools already do. It’s not rocket surgery

Ron a hufflepuff? No way. No fucking way. Go fuck yourself.

Not that guy, but he is. His personality fits perfectly

She saw him being uncool, as he emphasized by contrasting the situation with the imaginary scene of him telling a very funny joke, and that includes the people he was with as much as the goo. He was there with a fourth year, a lunatic, and the school's biggest loser, not with Ron "Chad" Weasley and Hermione "top of every class" Granger.

What’s truly baffling is the fact that English theatre race lifts constantly by tradition; It’s been doing it for nearly 500 years, in fact.

You need quite literally no justification to cast anyone or anything in a play, because you are absolutely guaranteed to have precedent for doing it.

>Daily reminder
Dull reminder*

How did Hermione end up with someone as retarded as Ron having been dating superior bulgarian chad when she was but 14?

Slytherin are just the chads of the wizard world. they do what they want, and are damn ambitious and inventive.

I mean...I'm a slytherin, and im pretty sure i would want to learn dark magic. Jus like i am morbidly intrested in seeing child porn, or wasting my life, just to see if life truly can only be lived once and if the regret is real.

>houses matter
yeah no.

She wasn't hot in the books

Wasn't hufflepuff essentially hogwarts special ed?

Hagrid calls them retarded in the first book. Hagrid.

>Jus like i am morbidly intrested in seeing child porn, or wasting my life, just to see if life truly can only be lived once and if the regret is real.

I guess that really is an inventive definition for being ambitious.

kek

True. Original plan was Ron would be Gryff and Neville Huff, but personality wise that list is accurate. Ron's the loyal devoted friend, Neville's the shy kid who grows into everything Gryffindor stands for

Good one, there's so many easy ways like that to solve that problem, could also make every lesson have students from every house together, or work out a schedule that puts Harry with each of the other houses every day or two. We could've had house kino with a main character in every house, maybe then they would've been more developed.
Having Harry in Slytherin also means we'd never have the "all the evil people are in Slytherin" bullshit. Plus fun Harry and Draco in the same house hijinks

>I mean...I'm a slytherin

Attached: 1520739758710.jpg (1200x899, 78K)

You won’t get as many (you)s as the first one, user

Such good bait can not be posted only once user

>Plus fun Harry and Draco in the same house hijinks
Now make Draco female and we have a deal

You're not a slytherin, bro

Obviously.

Why would she worry about the houses of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowlings mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read Harry Potter you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: NO.jpg (1622x2886, 569K)

>Ron Weasley was brave
what did they mean by this?

Anyone attempted shakesperean version yet?

I like the ebonics one personally.

Imagine writing your home to your parents that you're a certified average fuck

Attached: ab5.jpg (620x670, 30K)

How can we save him, Sup Forums?

Attached: New-Harry-Potter-Back-Cover-UK-The-Half-Blood-Prince.jpg (800x941, 54K)

Certified chad. If Harry made friends with him early on things would be very different. Guaranteed safety from bullying of any kind, great connections through the Malfoy family's influence in the wizarding world, and access to the comfiest common room (if he hit it off with Malfoy at that point he wouldn't beg the hat to put him somewhere else)
Damn, Slytherin Harry would be beyond kino

If malfoy hadn't made fun of weasley the first time they met they probably would have.

Attached: fem_draco_malfoy_by_deepdepp-d8yfwuh.png (702x1138, 800K)

Timeturners? Huh?!

>I wrote my mom telling her I got into hufflepuff and she stopped writing me back

>The hero of the story should be universally liked, well-connected and comfortable from the very start.
Are you an American by any chance?

He probably writes fanfics with that same premise that he never ends because it gets boring and he has no idea where to take the story.