Wikileaks False Claims

So I was just listening to the local college radio and between a great Yessongs set the djs were bantering about how Wikileaks is peppering in false emails to take down Clinton and they said Assange must be rigging the election for Trump

Is there any validity to these claims?

Other urls found in this thread:

foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/Nov04_2016/F-2016-07895_1-6/DOC_0C06133863/C06133863.pdf
twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794618628142342145
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

did they mention Russia?

gee I hope so

Did they also inform you that Trump is actually Putin in a body suit?

You'd best believe them, college DJs are known for their outstanding political savvy and insider knowledge.

if they are then theyre doing a shit job

Yes they mentioned Russia as funding attacks

I know they aren't a reputable source

I'm just wondering if hill shills have any data given credence to these claims

this was also in drudge report earlier today

What is DKIM verification??

They've only ever published anti Hillary material but nothing on Trump. So they definitely have an agenda.

they have published plenty of material critical of conservatives.....democrats loved him when he was leaking the war tapes

foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/Nov04_2016/F-2016-07895_1-6/DOC_0C06133863/C06133863.pdf

What about the ones that aren't coming directly from Wikileaks?

Doubt there's any validity. Wikileaks has an excellent record of accuracy.

Wiki leaks doesn't post fake documents.

If they mentioned Russia funding the hacks or feeding info to Wikileaks then they are absolutely full of shit.

I figure that but you know Dems are going to believe that Assange is trying to just take down Hillary and dismiss the emails

twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794618628142342145

Google has verified a large portion of the emails

If they had put false claims in, they could've spiced them up a bit frankly, because it's been pretty thin gruel so far.

Thank you this is great info to have to combat this

ok, here's the deal.
Clinton is going to be charged for bribery, and obstruction of justice.
Rumor is, she will also be charged for sex acts with minors.
Obama is going to be drawn into it as well.
The regime and all of the progressive left has a whole lot, lot, lot to lose.
HRC will be convicted if charged.
She will do serious time.
What's going to happen:
Charges will be brought forward, the accusations will be incredible, they will be hard to believe.
HRC and Obama only have to claim the accusations are false and it's a conspiracy to undermind them.
If they do that, the entire left will believe them.
When they refuse to step down, americans will figgt to remove them.
Those americans will be called terrorists by the regime and media.
They will most likely deploy state assets to defend against what they claim is an insurrection.
This would lead to total civil war.
The only other option for them is to submit to charges, in which case they lose everything.
This is not going to be a choice for the regime, they will do it, if they don't, they'll lose everything and be convicted and publicly disgraced.
>They will take the path of least resistance, and their followers will follow.

Wikileaks DOES NOT post fake documents. They would have absolutely no freaking validity if they did. Libtards LOVED them when they were releasing materials concerning the iraq war, bush 43 etc. Wikileaks focus is mainly on revealing what govt and politicians want to keep hidden from people who have a right to know

the emails that theyre leaking are already in possesion of the fbi and the nsa

if they were actively influenting usa elections with disinfo theyd be called out by those who have the data inmediately

We need a good civil war

Dunno, wikileaks has never been neutral but that doesn't mean they're full on anti-clinton.
Then again you could easily buy a man like Assange with an anti-establishment promise, maybe insinuate he might get to be less locked up on an embassy if he helps you win.

Don't worry, you're going to get one, it's a logical likelihood

Trump is a private citizen.
Hacking private citizens and leaking their private info was never part of Wikileaks agenda.
They leak secret info of the government that they feel the public should know about as it pertains to them and how their country is governed.

Or maybe the media is dropping all the negative shit on Trump and wikileaks is fighting back. If the connections are true they need to be stopped. The emails were not hacked by Russia, instead released by US intelligence

OP, report them to the FCC.

Assange it's locked in an embassy, for years, it's the same with Russia after years of demonizing them, and put bases and armies all over their borders, all that trump had to do was not antagonizing them, if they lose the establishment defeated themselves.

Years of bad policies, wide spread corruption, and shit that we can't even find out.

If they lose now they lose for real, against a well established candidate, with full media support, endorsing celebrities, the full show.

All that Trump had to do was winning it's party spot, for real, not by fixing it, that proved that he can win an election.

Seriously to Clinton supporters, it looks bad, it looks really bad, all that she has to do, so you can keep your jobs, and if she loses you'll turn your backs on her inmediatly, cause that's the kind of people you are, and that's the reason, why Trump could win.

You don't think the FCC is in on it too?

DKIM validation against google public data says no. Shame you're too much of a faggot to know that.

sage this this.

No, but there are fake emails that other people have been making and then circulating as truth, thus giving Democrats license for their delusion.

Wikileaks has never had a single false publication and there's enough terrible stuff validated by Google hashing that they don't need to make up anything.

no.

Well the authenticity is real. Most of the big bombshells have been dkim verified.

Can Anyone give me a history of Palantir & Wikileaks? Didn't they originally want to do this to them in order to discredit Assange?