Did you know psychologists have showed that almost everything feminists complain about is really due to other women? It's called Female Control Theory.
Do you think there should be wider awareness of the way women control other women in order to make sex a limited resource?
austin-institute.org
...
It's common sense, thats why women fear "shaming", its their social standing with other women.
I think it should be taught in schools. Understanding how our society works is important for everyone.
Right now feminists are blaming men for their restricted social roles when they should be looking at the way other women reinforce them.
Finally a post thats not muh US election. You've earned my bump
This explains why the most vehement anti-abortion campaigners and anti-contraception campaigners are all women.
My ideas about conservatives were all wrong. Conservative men don't care much about policing women. But conservative women sure do.
>teaching pseudoscience at school
Please, no. I've had psychology in high school and all it does is make teenage faggots think they are some kind of intellectual. We don't need more tumblrinas.
I don't think all psychology is pseudoscience. A lot is, but not all.
Stuff like knowing about biases is really useful, and the real differences between men and women. But that would make the heads of the PC types explode.
took an intro to psych course in college... it was a fucking pseudoscience.
With that being said, it did offer some insight I otherwise would have attributed to "reasons". So it was somewhat helpful in understanding a lot of the stupid shit that people do.
back on the OP though... I believe the only valid response to this paper is, "No shit."
But the only explanation you're allowed to say in universities is "Something, something, patriarchy."
The truth is the exact opposite. We don't have a patriarchy, but a matriarchy.
>women are conspiring against me!
Every time.
No large demographic coordinates like that. Hive minds don't exist in humans.
The view that men suppress female sexuality received hardly sny support
Well, yeah, in today's fucked up society. In a civilized do c iety ehere eomen are treated as property it is like tgat.
lol, completely ignorant fuck detected
It's not a hive mind, it's just many individuals all with the same tendencies/objectives that lead to a widespread observable effect.
> Hive minds don't exist in humans.
He literally says this on Sup Forums
It is very easy for large numbers of people to coordinate if there is a common culture.
It's not a conspiracy, it's a female-wide cultural agreement.
Research the history and politics of the DSM-5.
what is the unconciouss mind..
kill your self
Any links?
Jesus Christ, did you have a stroke while typing that?
I don't understand.
Aren't feminists all about promiscuity and free sexuality for women? Doesn't that make the metaphoric "value" of sex go down?
Is this why the really attractive girls in my social circle have been giving me a lot of positive attention since I turned down a girl because I heard she'd been fucking lots of guys?
>user I didn't think you had such high standards
>He's right she really is a slut
>user come with us let us introduce you to our friends who aren't sluts
Why is Sup Forums always right?
Yes. In other words, the feminists are not really fighting men at all, but all other women.
Feminism is an intra-female dispute.
what is genetical selection in behaviour?
Then why do they blame it on us? are they just stupid?
Muh evil white male boogeyman
sounds like females are better national-socialists than men
or should we call it gender-socialists
I don't understan you faggots. You really want women that fuck around with any guy they know? The women who are against this are red pilled, they are doing society a favor. (male here)
Most of what people claim to respect about psychology seems to actually come from philosophy and logic.
Psychology is too respected and causes more problems than its worth. Hell, just the introduction of the behavioral approach to psychology in the 60's ruined how the west handles insane folks.
The bare minimum of legitimate psychology could be taught but I think more philosophy, logic and debate orientated classes would be far better for the young.
checked, that user may indeed have died.
Scapegoat.
It's pussy power, everyone knows women can't bring anything to the table other than breeding capabilities, so they've been using it as leverage against men to garner resources. Modern day women are nothing but financial assassins through use of vagina voo-doo towards men.
I think it's about politics.
Identifying other women as the source of repressing women would be divisive. Feminism that told the truth would be a hard sell. As a movement for a few people to gain power, it's better to point fingers at men, which makes sure the problem will never be solved.
Feminism, race politics and gay politics also align this way. They can all agree straight white man is the ultimate source of all evil. Feminists could not ally with other left-wing groups if they told the truth.
shut the fuck up you bigot everything is men's fault, specifically white men
Dude, did you just now figure this shit out? Sex-nagative femisim is about locking down sex as a resource used by other women because:
1. They hate men and want men to suffer.
2. Other women use it to get ahead and most feminists are ugly fatdumplings.
3. They want to use shame in place of sex to control men because of points 1&2.
4. They want to maintain control over other women to prevent them from becoming too successful thereby undermining any power that feminism holds.
Women's power traditionally is not direct, rather it is subtle, coercive, and indirect. It flanks around the sides or stabs in the back, but never goes head to head.
>Modern day women are nothing but financial assassins through use of vagina voo-doo towards men.
I'm pretty sure it's been this way for millions of years. The paper shows it's about a human universal.
No one hates females like females.
That's why Hillary won't win. Despite how much they may talk shit about Trump in public, privately they know that a post-menopausal cuckholded woman is one of the worst things that could happen to them.
PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP
>genetical
fucking krauts amirite?
>Feminism is an intra-female dispute.
Feminism is the Islam of behavioral pseudoscience.
>1 post by his ID
I'm so torn on what I should get for my birthday. I thought about getting the archangel stock for my mosin nagant, but I also just got my AR and want a new stock/grip/vert fore grip bipod/new magpul mags/ammo/trigger/bcg/charging handle/BUIS/etc. It's a tough decision.
Yeah. Like... feminism, as a theory, just does not check out with reality.
It's disturbing universities are teaching an ideology that just doesn't make any sense.
Sure, you could say the same about religions, but everyone knows they are religions. There is separation of church and state.
There should be separation of social science and state, too. Because these ideologies can do real harm if they are legislated.
i'm not anti contraceptive but pretty anti abortion and i think they can understand the destruction it causes better, most of them used to perform abortion in a female clinic etc. but i do agree with the control theory to an extent but there's always exceptions. people always talk about "b-but abortions kill niggers how can you be pro life!!" without realizing that leaving it up to the states would cause a mass nigger migration to certain states for their abortion laws and clear the ghetto ones out of your pure state. that or dems bus them to another state.
Also there's no way she fires that sitting like that. It would knock her on her ass.
WTF are you talking.
Anti-abortion women are almost inexistent
My daughter is currently doing Pschology A'level and the scariest part is how the teachers leave no room for interpretation or alternative theories even though most psychological theories are de-bunked within a few years
I'm just saying the most active anti-abortion activists tend to be women. Men don't tend to have such strong feelings on the subject.
The only way you can explain opposition to BOTH abortion and contraception is if it isn't about reducing abortion, but about policing women having sex. And that's something women care about, way more than men.
>Hive minds don't exist in humans.
what do you think a society is?
Depends on how much dosh you got to drop, but 4realz, never, ever archangel up a Mosin. That's like tacticooling out a 10/22.
The universities are currently in the process of deconstructing logic. Think of it this way, if students really learned logic and critical analysis, the universities wouldn't be able to fleece them with tuition for soft-skin degrees with no job prospects. These degrees are currently one of the biggest money-makers for the universities, however, because they have easy entrance requirements and often get bogged down into a 5-year plan due to mandatory diversity bullshit (and yet still no mandatory statistics or data science, which would both help students critically analyze media and academic studies as well as give something useful toward jobs).
Yes, but no large group does such specific things (which are also detrimental to themselves) without having direct leadership.
>a female-wide cultural agreement
>to oppress females
Hmmm
Societies are groups working together to fulfil individual interests. Hive minds are groups working together to fulfil group interests.
How does women oppressing women work in favour of their individual interests?
It makes sense, but tbqh OP, women only choose men who are at the top of the hierarchy anyway(Which is something everyone knows intuitively), so I don't really get what's news about that paper.
That's why I only fuck dogs
The side effect of politicians trying to get everyone to go to university is that most people are not intelligent enough to benefit from a university course.
Most people don't have the IQ to program, work with numbers, or reason with data. So they had to come up with lots of non-courses, specially for women.
"White men are evil" is about as much of an abstraction as the lower half of the bell curve can deal with, so now they base whole degrees on it.
welcome to pol
your definition of a societies as 'groups working together to fulfil individual interests' is complete bullshit. How is a soldier sacrificing himself in battle in the soldier's individual interest?
Soldiers are different - they're specifically indoctrinated to think like that. The rest of society doesn't behave the same way.
Woman do not want shit, they cant rationalize things. When you rationalize, you lose the passion. In fact you`ll lose all the feelings towards rationalized object. Positive and negative.
What feminists wants - is to push shit trough females, because you just have to advertise something to them and at the moment they like(←which is an emotion) you, they will push your shit up 5-to-life.
Currently they are pushing isolation, impotence, frigidity and despair. Because they thing lonley single self-hating people consume more. Which is true short-term and has severe side effects. But that`s a sabotage operation, so nobody doing it really cares.
Now rationalize this: why do they need females in top-management and on the battlefield?
The same autoimmune feminism pushing females.
p.s. Fuck the anglo.
>Most people don't have the IQ to program, work with numbers, or reason with data.
Most of this has nothing to do with IQ. Even autists and retards can program, in fact they're often better at it because they lack the social distractions and wandering imaginations of healthy humans. Nevermind the fact that most people don't want to actually sit and stare at lines of code or numbers all day long. This is the great tragedy of the push for STEM-- most people just don't want to do STEM-related jobs. It's nothing about intelligence, and when you look at what has been cut out in order to allow stupider people into universities, it's mostly things like Latin and Greek, philosophy, logic, interrogation techniques, bastardized epistemology and morality, and so on.
>Soldiers are different - they're specifically indoctrinated to think like that.
No, soldiers sacrifice themselves so that their societies can live on. The indoctrination highlights the concept that the threat will destroy society. Most soldiers accept the destruction of the person in order for the society as a whole to continue existence. Actually, most people will act like this when truly pressed. It's ingrained in our dna.
You're wrong man. Cowardice and desertion have always been huge problems in the military, to the point that they're usually punished by death.
Most people will not act like that when pressed, they might to save their families, but that's within their interests.
>psychology
>pseudoscience
No wonder why your country is such a shithole
My wife is conservative and mostly pro-life
She is ok with abortion in the cases of rape and life of the mother otherwise that intercourse was the choice of both consenting adults. A life shouldnt be ended because of poor decisionmaking and negligence of contraceptives. Our tax dollars also shouldnt go to planned parenthood or the welfare of a single mother popping out her 3rd-4th kid.
One of the things she says is "You had sex, what did you expect? A flatscreen TV?"
My wife feels the same way.
> Our tax dollars also shouldnt go to planned parenthood or the welfare of a single mother popping out her 3rd-4th kid.
So she is okay stepping over starving kids and dead bodies? Or being robbed by desperate people? I assume she realizes that's what she'd get.
> Cowardice and desertion have always been huge problems in the military
Mostly in mass-non-discriminatory-enlistment army.
If that`s professional army, or there are rules like "don't enlist firstborn sons", then that`s absolutely different question.
There is a lot to the military motivation today. A lot of ways to give people what they need in exchange for them risking their lives or whatever.
Also remember kamikaze.
It's not about a hive mind or intentional conspiring - it's saying that the basic instinct that every woman possess is to try to make their own sexual value higher. It just so happens that by restrictions other women they can do this. Like setting high standards of fashion and beauty, or shaming other women for having many partners...They don't all agree to do this, they naturally do it because heir instinct instincts to make themselves more valuable.
Don't blame the crimes of the Anglo on the nature.
It's two different groups. Undesirable women who can't survive in the sexual environment created by other women seek to lower the standards for everyone and cheapen sex so they can get mates. Women with value seek to raise the standard and make the sexual environment harsher so they have less competition.
It's basically pretty vs ugly, it very simple terms.
Feminism was started by the women who couldn't get husbands, and other females being dumb latched onto it like they do.
"If pussy were a stock right now it'd be plummeting, you're giving away too easy" - Dave Chappelle.
>Societies are groups working together to fulfil individual interests.
Fucking kekked
this is pretty evident even at a young age
They're all like that. You should be homeschooling your daughter, everything they teach her is brainwashing. Her peers who have drank the kool-aid enforce it.
>Mostly in mass-non-discriminatory-enlistment army.
Exactly, the majority favours their individual interests.
>professional army
>kamikaze
Like I said, indoctrination. That and the fact that people who join professional armies generally don't have many personal interests so they take the collective's as their own.
Oy vey! Don't question how the human mind works. Don't kindle an interest of this topic in young people. What has introspection and the studying of the brain ever done for anyone!
women are completely unable to hold independent thought.
>Feminism that told the truth would be a hard sell. As a movement for a few people to gain power, it's better to point fingers at men, which makes sure the problem will never be solved
Ever wonder why George Soros' transition from race-betraying Jew super-Nazi financeer to super-egalitarian new wave feminist financeer was so fluid?
I don't. Not anymore.
who cares what you "think"? psychology is snake oil and meets no scientific standard of reproducibility.
>psychology
>a science
But this theory does sound plausible to me anyway
Practically every aspect of society caters to individual comfort. The only way it works when that isn't the case if people are forced to go along with it.
Cooperation gives nearly equivalent short-term benefits and better long-term ones, which is why we're genetically predisposed to it.
indeed.
Differences between race and sex in terms of cognitive function have been reproduced better than most physics results.
I hate this woman and Joe and their shitty television program. Who watches this shit?
sheer degeneracy.
One thing: Don't modern feminists and SJWs promote slut walks and other stuff? That doesn't sound like maitaining shortage.
Yep. They are fighting against standards imposed by other women, not men.
>That and the fact that people who join professional armies generally don't have many personal interests
Wow, are you wrong.
Are we a hivemind because everyone on this damn board can agree that 2+2=4?
Hivemind implies a lack of cognitive function or reason. Some things dont need to be questioned if they are agreed to be reasonable.
This
>Most of what people claim to respect about psychology seems to actually come from philosophy and logic.
This, if you actually think about social situations and behavior of people around you, you will get the same conclusions as 'psychologists'.
Agreed with the debate thing, just remember how fun were school classes where the teacher was chill and you could talk about stuff related to what you are taught.
I still don't understand it in this context. I'm sorry, just very tired - hard day at work yesterday.
neurobiology is not psychology.
>Don't modern feminists and SJWs promote slut walks and other stuff?
Slut walks are the opposite of giving out sexual power. The advertise the goods, that women HAVE the sex, and that they also hold the power by choosing when they want to give it up. It's like holding a cookie over a dog's nose, just out of reach.
Why do you think feminists hate MGTOW so much? Because the MGTOW have found a way around the system by refusing to accept females' power through sex.
That image really made me experience neural-biological stimulation.
I can't wait till lovebots are released. It will the breaking of the chains that keep men as slaves.
Any and all men will have access to beautiful bots who have nice, kind hearted personalities, who look after them selves and their homes. And will ask for NOTHING in return.
Actually, a lot of femisim is based in this overt flaunting of sex in order to maintain a hierarchy of social power over both men and other women.
Consider victim blaming. Sane people realize that if a woman makes herself a target by wearing next to nothing, becoming so drunk she isn't in control of her mind or body, and placing herself into risky situations, then she is taking many steps that contribute to sexual assault. That is not saying that she deserved the assault, but it is saying that if she had made different choices along the way of the things that were fully within her control, then the assault likely would never have occurred. Sane individuals call this personal responsibility, however, feminists want women to remain victims and to be afraid of men as predators in order to lock down their sexual access while telling women that they are not victims in order to continue the advertising.
I just want a USB fleshlight that syncs up and pounds and undulates in rhythm with whatever VR simulation I'm using.
interesting
Someone should tweet that excerpt to see the female reactions to it. I think it could be a potential goldmine for keks
Psychology is too wide of a field for all of it to simply be declared "snake oil." While a lot of it has been infested with liberal bullshit there is still some decent research being done.
>biology is a hive-mind conspiracy.