Screencap this. We all know he will. He has lost early voting and has NEVER held a significant lead over Hillary in any aggregate of the polls.
Even with an indictment looming over Hillary, Trump will lose.
I know for most of you this is "babbys first election." You're naive teenagers and early 20-somethings that don't understand politics from a hole in the ground. In short, all of you are idiots and Tuesday will hurt.
Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and basically anyone else could have beaten Hillary Clinton. Hillary is a TERRIBLE candidate, is TERRIBLY unlikeable, is HORRIBLE at campaigning, and would be easier than Mondale to defeat.
But no, we got stuck with Trump. Trump was the candidate we picked. "Muh-muh enthusiasm and energy!!" shows how retarded you are. We snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory. We need a more bland, less controversial, more conservative candidate as our nominee.
Hell, Trump could have won if he (1) were actually conservative [there are quite a few Never Trumpers], (2) wasn't a political neophyte attacking miss universe and judges, (3) were not completely retarded on policy, and (4) didn't have graveyards in his closet [grab her by the pussy].
However, 40% of the idiotic Republican electorate selected him through a plurality. Now we lose.
Inb4 your whining about Ted Cruz being a Christian. Outside your babby millennial friend group, no one gets butthurt about Christians. Your transgender basement dwelling friends who jack off to anime porn aren't representative of the electorate.
Republicans usually lose early voting. If you weren't politically illiterate, you'd notice that early voting for Democrats is significantly lower than it should be.
Oh, and fuck Ted Cruz. He was horrible on trade, he was horrible on foreign policy, and he's only ever good on immigration when it's campaign season.
Muh low taxes, muh constitution isn't enough to differentiate oneself from Democrats when America is literally becoming North Mexico.
Leo Bailey
It wouldn't matter the globalists already picked Hillary.
Oliver Hernandez
at least trump has a small chance of winning a state like pennsylvania or michigan, cruz's ceiling would barely have him at 270 even if he was way up in the national polls
Adam Long
Sorry. Trade protectionism isn't conservative.
Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell aren't ranting about the horrors of free trade.
Nevada has already been won by the Democrats in early voting. Las Vegas went all out.
Without Nevada, it's near impossible for Trump to win.
Christian Barnes
>posted two days before the election
post this before Donald Trump is a shoo-in to win the primaries and maybe you would've been worth a screencap.
Nathaniel Cox
>Trade protectionism isn't conservatism
Conservatism is wrong, then.
Also, Sowell is an NR cuck that compared Trump to Hitler, so his credibility has taken a significant hit.
>Muh NV early voting
He's tied in CO, close in PA, etc. NV is nice (it's certainly not lost yet), but unnecessary.
Caleb Roberts
>oh fugg am Cruzmissile now He was just too slimy to be likable. Rubio was neocon bitchboy.
Gavin James
>Also, Sowell is an NR cuck that compared Trump to Hitler, so his credibility has taken a significant hit. yes, disagreeing with the Sup Forums hivemind means he's uncredible
Why can't he stick to reporting unsubstantiated stories by anonymous contacts that Hillary is involved in a government pedophile ring like a true conservative?
Jace Russell
We don't need another cocksucker not willing to attack the establishment/banks. It's do or die going all in. Elect anyone else than Trump and the slow decline continues and more and more sovereignty is given away to the UN.
Even if trump loses, he opened pandoras box, especially if he will start a media outlet in case he loses. Waiting another 4 or 8 years for such a candidate and the US would have been so far down the shitter, whites already a minority etc... The sooner the better.
People should realize: Only Trump can prevent the death of the US in the next 4 to 8 years... the other option would be a next Civil War and winning that. So be sure to know what you wish for.
Connor Turner
Yeah, but then you'd have to deal with having Ted Cruz as president.
>Ted Cruz would have won Not after MSM was done with him
Levi Morris
They said the same thing when Reagan ran for the first time and look how that election turned out.
Jonathan Nguyen
>this person who couldn't even beat Trump in the primaries would have won
Gavin Murphy
Leaf-tier post tbqh. "Muh Hitler" should destroy anyone's credibility.
Plus, it's not like Conservatives don't complain about free trade, just look at Pat Buchanan.
Carson King
Yeah that's nice and all but check out these repeating digits that say you're a huge tool
Nathan Sanchez
Felito is shit. Deport the freak to Cuba. And don't forget is freaky family.
Jack Collins
Cruz was anti-establishment.
Hurr durr Goldman Sachs wife.
Cruz was hated by the establishment Republicans. He stood up against them on the Senate floor. He didn't cower when Democrats tried to blame the Republicans for a government shut down.
I forgot to mention: Trump has absolutely no ground game or get out the vote operation.
It's fucking pathetic.
Jose Scott
Cruz is a fucking Leaf. And democrats would point that out every waking fucking minute of the election if he was the nominee. He never would have stood a chance.
Julian Lopez
>what is a plurality >implying retard Trump voters wouldn't rally behind Ted Cruz
Pls
Jonathan Ross
CTR is coming on strong today.
Asher Barnes
there is literally a recording of Ted Cruz saying "we have a nigger in the whitehouse". no he would not have one. the leaked dnc emails show that the current strategy of calling the GOP candidate a racist sexust homophobe would have been used regardless of who got the nomination
