6>3

6>3

Attached: 1490602970773.png (1200x409, 35K)

"No!"

d>3>h

BASED

FOOKIN LOT

Did you mean 5>3? Because that would have been correct.

Harry should have banged that black chick at the beginning of 6. She was practically begging for some wizard cock.

Attached: 1507594473843.jpg (1556x882, 514K)

2 is shallow and poorly paced. 1 is much better. 1 is also better than most of Yates's flicks.

This. She wanted his BWC (big wizard cock) and that homo dumbledore wanted to plug potters boipussy instead

Tasteless pleb with no sense of cinematic understanding

Attached: 1485375200122.jpg (984x858, 115K)

2 is and always will be the beAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGHH!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGGHHH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH! AAAAAAAH!

>AAAAH AAAAARGH A-AARGH
"ARGH!"
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Attached: 1519738964901.jpg (1578x2842, 1.27M)

As much as I'd like to attempt to, I can't prove you wrong with regard to one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1459386328130.jpg (1600x2874, 538K)

4>1>2>5>7>8>6>3

fake and gay
unbased

REAL RATING
3 > 7.1 > 1 > 2 > 6 > 4 > 5 > 7.2

fucking kek

are these really the good ones?
maybe I'll watch them

3>6>7>5>1>2>8>4

literally the only ordering that makes sense:
3 >> 4 > 2 > 1 > 7.1 > 7.2 > 6 > 5

>4
>Halloween KKK Deatheaters
>shit ost
>ghost Pattison
no thanks

>3 > 7.1 > 1 > 2 > 6 > 4 > 5 > 7.2
this honestly seems most accurate.

put 4 last and its' perfect

4 is shit, but 5 and 7.2 are way worse in comparison desu.

7.2 had the battle of Hogwarts, and 5 had Luna at the very least. 4 just had Harry grow shitty hair

didn't 4 have Luna also?

4 was shit but it had Mad Eye

No, she's introduced in 5 with the testrals
That's true, forgot about him