Attached: 640_brodie-trenches.jpg (640x427, 47K)
What's the most accurate depiction of combat in a film ever?
Logan Ortiz
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
historynet.com
documentingreality.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Brayden Ramirez
me in combat with your mom's ass last night
Cooper Sanchez
based
Landon Reed
Talk about being in the shit.
Caleb Clark
Saving private Ryan beach landing scene
Thomas Allen
Forrest Gump ambush.
Angel Kelly
Hamburger HIll
Henry Jackson
dunkirk aerial sequences
Logan Rivera
fpbp
Lucas Nguyen
lone survivor
Jaxon Hernandez
Connor Hall
Any movie about welfare
Thomas Bennett
Sicario tunnel scene
Josiah Miller
Sands of Iwo Jima
Ethan Anderson
Levi Cruz
Thin red line, pacific, letters from iwo Jima, stalingrad, das boot,
Isaiah Sanchez
Not the most accurate but Full Metal Jacket is the best looking
James Thomas
Aaron Cook
I remember being really impressed by how realistic this was considering how daft combat was in most films at that time.
Kayden Garcia
Camden Carter
what the FUCK kind of dumb boomer thought of this shit?
Henry Torres
i was pissing myself in laughter when that happened
Bentley Morales
Come and See
Evan Perry
come and see this dick
Jackson White
Saving Private Ryan has been then only film which has impressed me with its attempt to portray modern violence accurately.
Jaxon Morris
Evan Cox
I think most of the external footage were actual army drills that Kubrick filmed.
Jace Stewart
Equilibrium is literally the film I'd have made at 14 after watching the Matrix and reading conspiracy theories online. I'll always love it for that.
Aaron Wilson
one year ago today, this battle started.
youtube.com
Caleb Hughes
None of them.
Pretty much everything you've been sold as real doesn't come close
Daniel Jackson
Dunkirk and Heat for sound design
Joseph Edwards
this for WW2
Black Hawk Down for modern
Eli Johnson
>Asking the combat experts on Sup Forums
Evan Morgan
Nah.
That movie with Mark Wahlberg where they all die but him is really accurate, except in real life the soldiers got fucked by like 6 arabs, not 500.
Jaxson Campbell
>le war is hell no one will ever understand
soy mentality
Sebastian Jones
I saw Forrest Gump with my grandfather, a WWII vet, when it came out in theaters. He said this scene was exactly like the combat he experienced. He told me later that even though he shot hundreds of rounds at the enemy, he doesn't remember actually seeing one or even an outline. He would just see flashes and he would return fire.
youtube.com
He fought in the Pacific so his experience might have been different than someone who fought in more urban areas like in Europe.
Aaron Myers
>6
Closer to 15, although some reports said 30.
Levi Harris
You're a brainlet that has literally no idea what the book is about.
David Parker
genuinely enjoyed this comment, ty based user
Aaron Watson
I'm all for supporting the military, but any casualty figures the US government gives after a defeat are suspect as fuck.
Jayden Hall
It's a true fact that the majority of soldiers would not shoot to kill back then.
It took psychological training that the U.S. Military did to shoot on instinct rather then just shoot that trained soldiers to shoot to kill.
It's a really interesting phenomenon.
>In a squad of 10 men, on average fewer than three ever fired their weapons in combat.
-Quote from the article I linked about Vietnam.
Evan James
This is most of that book btw. It's really interesting and is on the Corps recommended reading list.
Adam Wood
full metal jacket in terms of actual combat
saving private ryan in gun sounds,explosions, blood ect. Everything but actual tactics
Levi Allen
Ryan Johnson
Aiden Sanchez
>gun sounds
haven't seen SPR in a while, but Heat probably has better gun sounds, I'd assume
Adam James
Jesus fuck
Anthony Diaz
Those aren't casualty figures, just the numbers of fighters they might have encountered. I doubt the Redwing guys killed more than a handful of enemy soldiers, if any. Here's what it probably looked like:
documentingreality.com
Brody Collins
Well then ignore the 'modern' part although many soldiers on both sides had access to automatic firearms, sophisticated artillery was used, radar, submarines , radio communication essentially the same as used today, high quality weaponized aircraft etc. its pretty modern world history considered . But that was WW2 i was speaking about, what i meant by 'modern' is that SPR was shot in the late 90s(98) almost 2000, so yes modern film.
Leo Carter
I don't know if it was the camera work, but the movie felt so fucking fake to me.
Isaac Bennett
>me on the right
Brody Walker
This endless scroll through No Man's Land in Paths of Glory
youtube.com
Jonathan Hernandez
Oliver Davis
He was in the bad bush.
Brandon Parker
A Bridge Too Far
this as well
Adam Collins
>written by a Lt. Col who has probably spent more time on the battlefield than you have spent alive
>haha soy aren't I funny?