BELLATRIX IS GONNA FUCKING WALK THANKS TO YOUR SHIT POTTER, 4 MONTHS WE'VE BEEN ON HER AND STILL YOU DECIDE TO TAIL HER BROOM ALL THE WAY TO HER HOUSE AND SEARCH HER CAULDRON WITH NO WARRANT, ALL THAT FELIX FELICIS AND WE CAN'T EVEN PIN A DAMN POSSESION CHARGE ON HER
HARRY'S A LITTLE HOTHEADED BUT DAMMIT IF HE GETS RESULTS.
Austin Morris
>Haha i posted the same thing i've seen in the last 25 threads yes!!
Colton Scott
YOU BURNED ALL THE SPELL BOOKS IN THE LIBRARY POTTER! BUT SOME OF THOSE TEXTS HAD BIGOTED MESSAGES FROM WHITE MALE WIZARDS AND DESERVED IT! 6,000,000 POINTS FOR GRYFONDOR
Henry Mitchell
Is Bellatrix the sort of female role model a progressive artist should be creating?
Jack Bennett
>BELLATRIX IS GONNA FUCKING WALK THANKS TO YOUR SHIT POTTER, Sounds like an opportune time for her to stretch her legs, No!
Samuel Ortiz
Once they take care of me, they'll come for you. And I'm not talking about the Death Eaters: I'm talking about the Aurors, I'm talking about the Ministry. You think you did yourself a favor taking on the most powerful dark wizard the world has seen? Now every Auror's Grignott account is going to be missing Galleons. They're going to take it out of your ass.
Why did they put as many cop movie tropes into harry potter? I guess the confusion was meant to distract from its status as one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though "No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowlings mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read Harry Potter you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Did you really delete my post in a spam thread you pedophile fuck?
Big fucking mistake creep. The few will hear about your child porn peddling through the reylo shill threads
Julian Allen
I GOT THE MINISTRY OF MAGIC BREATHING DOWN MY ASS TO CATCH THIS GUY AND HERE YOU ARE TRYING TO PLAY HERO. WE'RE DOING THIS BY THE BOOK, POTTER. IF HE DEHS ONE MORE PERSON BECAUSE OF YOU IT'S YOUR WAND ON THE LINE.
It's people desperate to be first off the mark, so they get together any kind of shit and throw it out there without bothering to think if it even applies.