Worst "Best Picture" oscar winner of all time?

Worst "Best Picture" oscar winner of all time?
Worst "Best Picture" oscar winner of all time

Attached: fish cuck.jpg (500x735, 139K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=k9eph-UuMZE
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

youtube.com/watch?v=k9eph-UuMZE

Reminder

That'll go to Black Panther next year.

Nah, Crash still tops that.

Nah, Shakespeare in Love was much worst

Crash is better than The Shape of Water. Never really understood the hate for Crash, but yeah, I wouldn't have given it an Oscar

No, what the fuck?

Moonlight, Spotlight, 12 Years a Slave, Argo, King's Speech, Crash are all worse, forgettable and non-original best picture winners and worse the shape of the water


Academy Awards are just a big political joke that shouldn't be taken serious anyway

When was the last decent best picture winner

>shakespeare in love
>cumslut millionaire
>12 Weeks a slave

Some of those movies are good cunt. Just admit you liked it for fish sex.

No Country for Old Men

>12 years a slave
Isn't that bad. I don't get the hate.

Kings speech is a great movie.

Shakespeare in Love and Crash are actual shit movies that won because women were allowed to vote

>I don't get the hate.
It's fairly obvious

>Spotlight

Jesus that is such a fucking boring movie. I give it points for being realistic, but it's so goddamn boring, no stakes, no drama, nothing.

poorly written, no sense of stakes or time lapse, feeling more like Solomon spend a few weeks over a summer as a slave instead of the titular 12 years. And Chizwezel wasn't given any good material to show his acting chops, it was 1:1 stale adaption of a 200 year old account there was no cinematic flair or visual dimension to the film

There were better disputing films than those that should have won

Spotlight was the WORST of all contenders and was given the prize as propaganda

12 years a slave was worse than Gravity, Her, and was awarded as propaganda too

Oscars are just a shitty joke that went too far

I watched it last night - it was a pretty terrible movie. It didn't sell the "relationship" between the woman and the fish at all so she just came off us a gigantic pervert taking advantage of the aquatic equivalent of Koko the gorilla. On top of that, none of her friends were in the least bit alarmed or concerned that she had begun fucking a fish. Then she dances with it in a fantasy musical number. Terrible. 2/10. Would be 1/10 but I like Michael Shannon

its not about the relationship pleb, its about the forbidden love aspect. Was Little Mermaid revered as a classic because of its riveting romance?

Fuck no. Its beloved by al because its about leaving your life behind when everything is stacked against you for that opportunity of a greater love beyond your comfort zone.

12 years was far better than both of those movies.

>12 years a slave was worse than Gravity, Her, and was awarded as propaganda too

Your taste is trash.

Nope it wasn't, it was just an unoriginal flick with no outstanding features that competed with the likes of Wolf of Wall Street, American Hustle, hell, even fucking Captain Phillips was better

At least Dallas Buyers Club didn't win, I guess

But the technical level of 12 Years a Slave was a lot inferior to most of the film disputing the oscar that year, it was nothing special yet it won, as white guilt propaganda or whatever

>its about the forbidden love aspect
Romeo and Juliet is forbidden love done well. The Shape of Water is about a pervert who, after going so long without getting laid, decides to inflict her sexual frustrations on a barely-intelligent monster. She would have done better to stick a dildo into a pouch of Starkist tuna fish