Not Slytherin, eh? You know what, you little bitch? I'm in charge here. I'll decide where you go. I can read your thoughts, you know that, right? You just learned about Hogwarts like last month. What the fuck do you know about the houses? What did any Slytherins ever do to you? Literally nothing. These houses are supposed to be fun. You know what, fuck you.
>dog whimpers and puts his paws up to cover his eyes
Mason Jones
Could not expect this good dialogue in the the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>talking shit to one of Voldemort's horcruxes That hat is getting Avada'd
Luis Parker
Me? I'd sort this thread into the house of "dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises". Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though "No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Keep up the good work. tumblrinas from Sup Forums and Sup Forums like think this pasta is just a meme and not 100% truth agreed by people who have taste in film and literature
Snape gets dangled upside down after their last exam (summer) and he's just wearing underpants. It's not outlandish to expect that girls in his year might wear less than he did.
Benjamin Watson
me in the back
Owen Sanchez
>"Sounds like the Iranians are having fun!" FTFY
Ryder Gutierrez
>You are...hmm..interesting...Elf slave! *everyone cheers >w..what do you mean, that's not a house? >I don't give a fuck *Large goblin man picks up boy and carries him off screen as chains rattle in the distance
Joseph Carter
Kek
Ryan Harris
can someone explain DEH to me? also why a children's school allowed an "evil" house
Samuel Jones
>also why a children's school allowed an "evil" house Slytherin isn't actually an 'evil' house.
Parker Green
>not evil >their common room is a dungeon >their house mascot is a snake >the most influental Death Eaters were Slytherin I don't know man
Jayden Taylor
It's a house built up with a culture of racial superiority that advocates a lot of antisocial and destructive behavior. If it was a college frat, it would have been shut down years ago.
Benjamin Thompson
>shit-tier intro >not giving "No!" its own separate line Unforgivable