ITT: Movies that couldn't be made now
>Mel Brooks making fun of Kevin Costner's Robin Hood film which had cast Morgan Freeman in a film set in medieval Europe with Dave Chapelle's Ahchoo
Whats sad is that casting black people in time periods and places they don't belong in is a standard practice these days
'Ohhh Master Robin, you've lost your arms in battle!... but you've grown some nice boobs!'
Robin Hood Men In Tights was fucking kino Mel Brooks.
Britain was always black
pretty much any Mel Brooks movie really
>mel brooks is so jewish he shits bagels
>still gets attacked by sjws
How does this happen?
>not a single female role in a 4 hour long movie
>except that one extra in a hijab
CHECKED
But Morgan Freeman’s character is from the Middle East where Robin was held as a prisoner of the crusades.
And he gets shit on for being a godless heathan the whole movie.
Fuck off
you're an idiot and a massive racist which you probably admit with pride
He knows how comedy works whereas sjws kill comedy. They are diametrically opposed.
It couldn’t be made now because spoofs aren’t a thing anymore. This one was relatively tame in terms of content, too
This was made for kids like most Adam Sandler flicks
>Mel Brooks making fun of Kevin Costner's Robin Hood film which had cast Morgan Freeman in a film set in medieval Europe
Except his character is literally a moor that Robin brought back with him after escaping imprisonment during the crusades, and is treated with suspicion and as a savage by all until they get to know him.
>Ahchoo was Dave Chappelle
How was it tame, cause they didn't cuss a bunch?
Really dude?
contrast it with Blazing Saddles
the absolute state of newfags
>dave goes nuts cuz he thinks hollywood wants him in a dress
>he already wore one
Freeman is too black for middle east. WAY too black.
>ywn see comedy kino like this again
>moors were south saharian blacks
When Battlefield 1 adapted Lawerence of Arabia they retcon’ed the character to be female
Survive!
>moors where negers
True, but what parody is as controversial as Blazing Saddles?
desu I'm honestly surprised it got released at all without lefties autistically screeching to the high heavens
are there any good spoof comedies that aren't made by Mel Brooks?
I just saw Hot Shots yesterday and it was really hit and miss. To much slapstick that didn't go anywhere.
That's understandable as you were still underage.
As much as I love the movie the real Lawrence was a fraud and not nearly as alpha as peter o'toole
if anything the real lawrence was even more alpha
his memoirs are mostly forgery. every document about him that's approved by historians just makes him a mere diplomat and not some heroic guy that wanted to unite tribes to fight the osmans.
Shallow Hal
Literally every Adam sandler movie
That rob Schneider film where he becomes a woman
That movie was laaaaaaaaaaame, most of the jokes fall flat. You can't give it a free pass just because it features a subtle critic of corporatism.
Loaded weapon
But honestly if you didn't like hot shots, you may be the problem.
What is it with brooks that you didn't find in hot shots?
>laaaaaaaaaaame
underageb&
You'll learn that projecting doesn't work here.
>But Morgan Freeman’s character is from the Middle East
Says much more about you than them, user.
Don't leave yourself with nowhere to go now, killer.
I'm not the one who cried newfag over repeated letters.
Humble yourself.
>I'm not the one who cried newfag over repeated letters.
You will be, user. Humble yourself.
You already shown your power level here, moron.
Don't try so hard to fit in, I told you already it doesn't work.
It's easily one of the best american comedies of this century.
That's just sad.
No it's not. Tropic Thunder is a legitimately great and original comedy.
I give you original. But it barely qualifies as comedy.
Back up your claims and post funny clips.
>A BLACK SHERIFF?!?!?!
>why not? worked in Blazing Saddles
Always gets me.
Because it's just like the UN. The SJWs might attack Mel Brooks, but he doesn't receive negative publicity from it, in fact he doesn't get anything negative out of it, it's just a load of lesbians and cucks crying. There's no called boycott or anything like there would be if he wasn't a Jew.
So how is this like the UN? Prior to the UN there was the League of Nations, which was dissolved in 1946, after that a new organization was established, the UN, which was entirely Jewish founded. You might notice that the UN will constantly demand that countries, who don't have an (((allegiance))) with Israel, are told to disarm any nuclear weapons, but others, who have an (((allegiance))) with Israel, no one gives a fuck about. Although from time to time they will mention how they want all countries to disarm their nukes (with the exception of Israel). This is mainly because of the NPT.
Only recognized states are allowed nuclear weapons. You might recall Saddam Hussein (who, coincidentally, Israel wasn't good friends with) was invaded purely looking for "weapons of mass destruction" or, in the non-sensationalized term, "nukes" (non-sensationalized because it isn't the 1950s anymore). Yet, amazingly, Israel, which isn't a recognized nuclear state has built and tested illegal nuclear weapons and the UN doesn't say a word. It doesn't say a word because the entire organization exists purely for the benefit of Israel. You might hear the UN say some "nasty" things about Israel, you might even hear the UN condemn Israel every once in a while, but as far as actually putting any real preventive measure in place? Unlikely to the point of non-existent.
See it works in the same way, both make a lot of noise, but neither does anything because it would only be detrimental to themselves.
Just out of interest, how many films or movies can you think of where a Jew is cast in a bad light? Hard mode: Nothing set 200 or more years ago. Must be a pure coincidence, right?
>more like what do you need Les, glasses?