Communism

I have a lot of anarcho-communist friends who keep trying to win me over. Can someone explain to me why communism is unrealistic and/or bad?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=UOQb7Y5QVO8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Sure thing.

Look this guy u[.

Yuri Bezmenov

"Do X and I'll give you money. Until it becomes more profitable for me not to pay you. Or until I sense that I can get you to do more without paying you. Or until I just don't pay you. Wouldn't want to violate the NAP, now would we, slave?"

>communism is inherently atheist
>they appropriate that image
lmao

...

>Without paying you
That's when you leave

See

There is nothing more hilarious than american communists.

...

...

Communism assumes that there is no corruption within the controlling body or else the whole thing breaks down into Stalinism

Capitalism assumes that the competing bodies will check and balance eachother to prevent widespread corruption (I mean it failed at that but it assumes that if one guy is sacrificing quality to line his pockets then people will just go elsewhere)

It creates an unfair, two caste system. There are people with super rights - they are entitled to receive more than they produce. Then, the lower caste has inferior rights - they are forced to produce more than they consume.

Good Socialists spend your money on gibs until there is no more money for dem programs. Bad Socialists kill your family, you, and your dog then take your money until there is no more money for dem programs.

...

But leaving before you've finished your task creates a dangerous situation for me - imagine if you were building a house, and left halfway through its construction. It could fall on me and kill me! That's a violation of the non-aggression policy. So, either I can kill you, or I can keep you here long enough to finish your work. Which would you rather do, slave?

It's based on a flawed logic about the origins of value (value is based on productivity and demand, not the labour that was required as marx thought), the denial of human nature (ambition) and the removal of all incentives to actually be productive; all whilst being utterly reliant on a perpetual power vacuum never being filled (which has always ended up in dictatorship, again thanks to human ambition).

It has never worked, it doesn't work and it can't work. Even marx himself admitted it was nothing more than a pipe dream and he himself acknowledged that capitalism created vast amounts of wealth. Sadly had he been a bit smarter and not so contrarian all his life, he might have realised that a fairer and more balanced capitalism (capitalism in theory) is actually the perfect form of communism in that it rewards those that are productive and incentivises wealth creation and innovation that benefits all of society.

>anarcho-communist
So... explain this to me slowly please.

Anarchy: the desire for no or very little government
Communism: the desire for the state to ivade every part of society

So... which is it anComs?

dude... ask my fellow south americans in venezuela.
youtube.com/watch?v=UOQb7Y5QVO8

The Communist regime was a good political model for the 30 and even 50 years. He was allowed to bring people together for one purpose and intelligently allocate the resources of the country. But he demanded timely modernization, a strong leader and the lack of thieves. After Stalin's death, came to power is fool-Khrushchev, who planted all the country with maize and caused famine... Political model is slowed the pace of modernization. The country has increased the number of speculators and thieves. The new leaders had little differences from Khrushchev. They were old and conservative.

total retards. who is going to pay for all the free shit if there is no state? its probably a crazy idea where people go to work when they want to produce for the greater good with no one to administrate production or police or anything. sound great for 15 yo until they realize they need to go to work or there will be no food. and they need police because there is very bad people.

...

The communist will argue that "real communism" doesn't have a state since the workers united and formed a commune amongst themselves without higher interference. What that actually means is unopposable dictators and horrible brutal oppression.