Why is Case 1 bad again? All it does is weed out those with undesirable gents and traits...

Why is Case 1 bad again? All it does is weed out those with undesirable gents and traits, and encourages all men and women to improve themselves

Human beings aren't dots on a graph and there's more that goes into it than that

30% of the population will be unhappy, leading to riots

What are the ramifications for our species if every piece of shit gets to pass on their genes?

case 1 doesn't account for what happens when the kid is born.

We're living that right now

forces every men to work in being attractive to the other sex rather than being useful to society

>Why is Case 1 bad again? All it does is weed out those with undesirable gents and traits

and how does it do that? seems like the same social structure of lesser primates.

Because single mothers create more undesirable gents.

Because Sup Forums is at the bottom of the chart.

Case 1 doesn't account that anyone whom is equal to or below a 5 cannot get anybody, so are forced to settle with less in terms of "beauty", until they are done being used for ragdoll sex npc's.

The undesirables are mostly /pol basement dwellers, that's why their against it

>60% of the male population has no emotional stake in their people

sounds like a disaster waiting to happen

everyone in society reproducing ≠ better society

you can make clear arguments for why some people (cannot afford standards of living with children, have critical inheritable disorders/diseases, etc.) should not reproduce. and the same arguments work the other way around. you need more statistical arguments to make a case for one or the other. not a fucking kindergarten graph.

this
this is the reason Hillary has so many supporters

Because how many physicists are fuck monsters? How much pussy do classical artists get? Whats the average amount of girls that chemical engineers get?

>Why is Case 1 bad again?
because
>those with undesirable gents and traits
is Sup Forumsr9k/
>encourages all men and women to improve themselves
Takes actual effort, which obviously don't rhyme with having undesirable gents and traits

>Be Jose/Jamal

>Fuck ALL the white bitches and knock all of them up.

>The fuck's a job? Nigga, Imma just use welfare. It's like an easy ATM.

>Hundred years later.

>Be descendant of Jose/Jamal.

>Be broke with no gibs me dats, as the white man had died out long ago, stating that they would rather die than have to deal with a world full of Mestizos.

>Die of ultra AIDS as all society crumbles.

if the left version happens. the men that have no chance of reproducing will most likey become exremly violent (pretty sure that's already documented in societies that have more men than women). they will probably end up killing some of men higher in the pecking order and raping every woman they see.
evolutionary speaking that is pretty much the best thing that you can do. Monogamy is basically a basis for civilation
even muslims for example mostly are monogamous. only the highest in rank are allowed to more than one wife.
wider range of polygyny is only good when you conquered other tribes/people and stole their women.

Hm, there's tons of guys in China who wont get to pass on their genes. They don't riot, they just engage in degeneracy. Eventually they'll all die.

Olympians and scientists aren't the ones pumping out kids. The undesirables are the ones that breed like roaches. Unfortunately this isn't the animal kingdom where if the father disappears the new one kills all the old ones offspring.

i think i heard that kidnapping of women and selling them to china is on the rise in vietnam/thailand/...

Saudi-Arabia has more men than women. Guess what their undesirable males are doing? Yep, joininh JaN or Isis. And they don't even have sexual liberation, soon it will get worse at our societies.

Women are not at all capable of deciding who is genetically undesirable. All of those people who get weeded out might have been very intelligent but nerdy.

because the lower caste males in case 1 have two options: accept the status quo and die without mating, or rise up and slaughter the more successful males and rape the females.

To work out which they'll choose, simply ask: which option has evolution been selecting for?

-Option 1 gives them no chance for passing on their genes.
-Option 2 gives them at least some chance for passing on their genes.

tl;dr enjoy your wizard rebellion

left is bad if you're on the bottom of the rung... great if you're on the top

it's the same graph that can apply to wealth/money, assets, and pretty much any commodity..

what's better, capitalism or communism? (assuming you're talking about on paper, not in practice)

Yup, it's a big problem in the northern provinces of Vietnam, many are afraid to let their daughters out lest they be kidnapped.

well, it does lead to the mindset of it being better to blow yourself and dozens of others to smithereens to go off to a heavenly award since there is precisely dick chance of you getting laid in this life.

A society where half the young male population isn't fucking is a society that is going to routinely be on fire.

Thanks Chad or wannabe Chad

>Hm, there's tons of guys in China who wont get to pass on their genes. They don't riot, they just engage in degeneracy. Eventually they'll all die.
Your selling point is China? China sucks, a good guide for what not to do

sage in options field

>Why is Case 1 bad again? All it does is weed out those with undesirable gents and traits, and encourages all men and women to improve themselves
Nah, you'd have the high status women having one kid and the low status having several. Leading to dysgenics, similar to what we have now

all right let me explain why that shit is fucked up. beeing a 10/10 back in the day served no purpose if you did not provide for the family so back then a 10/10 male was the man more able to provide for her women and children now a 10/10 male is just the *swagiest* nigga around why is it bad? because being a 10 is based on beauty and its something subjective and you know whats nice about subjective view? they can be changed by peer pressure (((media or what ever))) so the one reproducing are the man being elevated to a beauty 10 representation by (((the people))) rather then a useful provider rating also kill yourself you fucking waste of space

how did that happen? are they stoning their women to death to fast or what? I would have expected that there are more women since they aren't allowed to do anything that has any risk of killing them.
you sure that the extra men aren't just workers that they imported (like Qatar, they have a large population of basically slave)

>All it does is weed out those with undesirable gents and traits


Maybe physical traits lmao (which is not even true in the case of girls, who are all caked in makeup and fake tan anyway)

Meanwhile people with intelligence are getting left out of the gene pool and society gets gradually dumber