Post 2012 election

>post 2012 election
>ok we lost massively among women, Latinos, African Americans, young people, etc.
>we have to figure out a way to win over these voters
>we have to be more inclusive
>oh I know let's nominate Donald Trump!

Name one party that has went more full retard than the modern GOP. Pro-tip you fucking can't.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5HIFxEEX2s0
vox.com/2016/4/21/11451378/smug-american-liberalism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The funny thing is, trumps doing better with women and latinos than recent gop nominees.

>doing better with women and latinos than recent gop nominees.

Said nobody ever. He's doing historically bad.

>mfw I have to share a political wing with these retards

Why must we have to vote for the stupid party all the time? Politics is not that difficult.

>my priority is to vote for someone who represents the interests of people who don't love this country or its interests

Holy shit you people really do live in an alternate reality.

I gather that's what they're reading from Breitbart or picking up in those talk radio networks that issued decrees that none of their hosts would say anything negative about Trump.

fuck you spic ill enjoy building that wall to keep you roachs out

What are they gonna do, pander harder than Democrats?

>elections aren't about pandering

Babies first election?

They COULD start by nominating someone who actually represents them.

But who wants that? Not even the GOP voters want that anymore.

The GOP is completely incompetent. They lost control over their own party. They pandered to those tea party cucks and brewed up all this anti-Obama rhetoric over the past eight years. They have nobody to blame but themselves for what crawled out from their bullshit.

Jesus Christ this place is retarded

It shall be a political axiom after this election that absolutely no value will be placed in the utterings of anyone who employs the word 'cuck.'

It's worse than that. These are mostly people whose attention spans and cognition have been seriously distorted by years or decades of computer time. They read bullshit news, then conflate it in their heads into something even more bullshit.

Like when "dead people are registered to vote" - a legitimate problem that has been discussed for years now and a side-effect of our massively decentralized electoral system - to "dead people are voting", for which there is no evidence at all, and which would be virtually impossible to pull off with how many partisan and non-partisan officials are involved at every stage of the process.

There was a Podesta email from 2008 about getting "oversamples" and they decided this was proof that the Dems were "rigging" the polls, even though polls come from dozens of different organizations, the email was to an internal pollster, and "oversample" refers to taking extra samples of minority groups to get a clearer picture of how they feel about something. But you'll still see people here running around saying it's been "proven" that Dems rig polls.

If anything Hillary being up so much might hurt her as lazy voters will think it's all gonna be fine and skip the ballot. That's more or less what happened in Brexit, a much tighter race.

Or the Clinton email that urges the US to put more pressure on Saudi Arabia and Qatar to end funding of ISIS and other jihadis by their own people, which has somehow morphed into "HILLARY CLINTON FUNDS ISIS - CONFIRMED"

They seriously live in an alternate universe and feed off each other to create mass delusion.

The saddest part is I'm completely sympathetic to white working America, I was a Webb man, but you nominated an idiot and now you're all acting like idiots with him.

Democrats will smear whoever the GOP nominee is as a racist, sexist, fag-lynching bigot. A black transwoman could win the GOP nomination and the DNC would still fling every insult at xer that they have used with Trump.

You are retarded

>GOP nominee is as a racist, sexist, fag-lynching bigot

Cruz literally got on stage with a pastor who say gays should be killed. keep in mind he came in second place to Trump btw.

youtube.com/watch?v=5HIFxEEX2s0

Retarded cuck

The labour party in the UK. people voted right, so they went with a socialist hippie

>we have to stop being a different party and become democrats
Trump is by far the best thing to happen to republicans in ages.

> Wanting the GOP to sell out the little integrity it has

As you said, elections are about pandering. However, if you pander to minorities for a candidate like Hillary Clinton to be president I think you are a piece of shit. The Democrats have proven to America that they let the establishment think for them.When you think about who you want to nominate and mix diversity in your choice you reach Trudeau levels of faggotry. Even if Hillary wins she will have a terrible legacy with the cards she's been dealt and how her name has been ruined. This movement has forced the GOP to change part of it's shitty self that people were criticizing it for. It's amazing.

Fuck off puppet, be proud of the Diversity you enrich yourself in when you vote for the exact candidate that our dumb elites wanted.

Get that notion out of your head: ability to out shit talk democrats is not a qualification for president. They're always going to be able to get away with it , the Republican has to bring a different quality into the mix and compete with that. Asymmetric strategy.

...

>tfw he will win

But that's exactly why Trump makes Democrats shit themselves with fear. There is finally a GOP candidate who isn't intimidated by their shaming tactics and is better at flinging mud than them.

HUU HUU HUUU

Go fuck yourself. We're winning.

>We're winning.

Stay mad.

Yep. Zero doubt. Zero fear.

>>oh I know let's nominate Donald Trump!

Only CTR would be stupid enough to pretend that they don't remember the INCREDIBLY hard fought primaries and RNC this year.

Canadas retarted

> mfw my Latina mother voted for trump
>twf when she's been raging about how Obama practically placed Shillary in office

>The saddest part is I'm completely sympathetic to white working America

No you're not. You're just another smug liberal.
vox.com/2016/4/21/11451378/smug-american-liberalism

Why on earth should we be more "inclusive" toward people that exclude us and are doing there best everyday to mock and destroy our culture?

I'm sure your response is that we should "compromise" and let ourselves be swept away by your "progress", that the "people" have spoken and we should stop resisting "democracy".

Well it doesn't work that way sweet-cheeks. We're not going to conveniently disappear from the landscape and ny locking us out of political power all do is give legitimacy to militants who think that your system is our enemy and that it's time to flip the table and stop playing a crooked game, and heaven help us all when that day comes.

>inb4 smug snark about drones even though most of the military is made up of us and isn't on your side.

>It's worse than that. These are mostly people whose attention spans and cognition have been seriously distorted by years or decades of computer time. They read bullshit news, then conflate it in their heads into something even more bullshit.
It has to be something more foundational than the amount of time digesting retarded shit. Plenty of people are able to live their professional (and then private) lives on the computer and don't turn out that way. My suspicion is a lack of awareness as to how to digest information.

>Like when "dead people are registered to vote" - a legitimate problem that has been discussed for years now and a side-effect of our massively decentralized electoral system - to "dead people are voting", for which there is no evidence at all, and which would be virtually impossible to pull off with how many partisan and non-partisan officials are involved at every stage of the process.
It happens, but it can't have nearly the amount of an impact as people think for all the poll watchers. Only possibly effective in 50/50 elections (and, more typically, in cases where an entrenched party is empowered to run up the score so to deter their opposition from even trying to compete).

>There was a Podesta email from 2008 about getting "oversamples" and they decided this was proof that the Dems were "rigging" the polls, even though polls come from dozens of different organizations, the email was to an internal pollster, and "oversample" refers to taking extra samples of minority groups to get a clearer picture of how they feel about something. But you'll still see people here running around saying it's been "proven" that Dems rig polls.
The rigging narrative comes from a natural distrust on our side of institutional information, being that a lot of those on the right see (rightfully) how institutions have been politicized, but taken to the unreasonable extreme.

>Or the Clinton email that urges the US to put more pressure on Saudi Arabia and Qatar to end funding of ISIS and other jihadis by their own people, which has somehow morphed into "HILLARY CLINTON FUNDS ISIS - CONFIRMED"
I hate that shit. Milo brags on the "post fact world." But you can't get good results out of politics in the first place you're not assuming a position that's correctly informed. This is the mistake a lot of us believe you of the other side suffers from, that while you may win this way, your lots don't improve. Only these people are seeing the 'win' as the goal, forgetting that the win should have meaning behind it.

>They seriously live in an alternate universe and feed off each other to create mass delusion.
This is going to be an increasing problem as time goes on, with circlejerks becoming more and more insular. We're raising a generation where challenging ideas literally upsets them to the point that they can't function rationally.

>The saddest part is I'm completely sympathetic to white working America, I was a Webb man, but you nominated an idiot and now you're all acting like idiots with him.
It happens every election cycle. Partisan newfags flood the place who believe they're all on a payroll somewhere and the election is decided by how much they shill for their guy. You can't reason with that level of idiocy.

You are right OP, but this board is autistic and will just call you CTR.

Trump has double or even sometimes triple the support of black and Latino voters among the last 6 Republican nominees since Reagan. What the fuck are you talking about?