Had an argument with a coworker, that "races" are biologically distinct populations and may have some effect on behavior. That sub-saharan cultures have not reached the same extent due perhaps to biological differences. She went to bed. Any autism-grade nukes I can use to support my argument and keep from being labeled a racist, or is it too late for me?
Does DNA determine behavior?
Colton Ramirez
Joshua Torres
Already proposed Lewontin's fallacy
Jonathan James
Shameless bump
Ryan Cooper
Any takers?
Landon Long
ump
Ayden White
Kevin Perry
So a higher percentage of blacks show aggression than whites when confronted with socially ostracized.
Leo Peterson
Yes, black niggers are stupid by default
Logan Phillips
too much election to get any traction?
James Rivera
In general. 6% of blacks have the *uniquely* black 2 repeat allele associated with high rates of criminality and impulsive behavior. And it is on the X chromosome, explaining how black women have rates of crime closer to white women than black men have to white men.
Brunner syndrome is a good extreme example of the behavior effects of MAOA receptor differences.
Cooper Collins
yes and I want the science
Levi Kelly
Go to cripplechan's /polarchive/. They have everything you need.
Brandon Allen
>she
Jason Gutierrez
In addition, there are FBI crime statistics by race, showing that blacks commit 50% of most crimes in the U.S. (especially violent crimes), despite being only 14% of the population, a 357% overrepresentation.
Though, actual advice: don't try to teach anyone who isn't receptive, or who thinks someone being racist is an immediate dismissal of an argument. Those ones have to learn a lot bigger things than race, such as the flimsiness of ideas of equality, and the precedence of natural law when it comes to realistic politics.
Colton Lewis
studies conducted among children have determined that while IQ certainly differs, the more important indicator for behaviour is - *drumroll* - growing up with a father, in a functioning family.
The explanation is simple too: there are twice as many monitoring eyes on everything the child does, even if they're unqualified it helps their growth as a person extremely.
Oh, and because we're Sup Forums here:
this means white single-mom entitlements are literally (((their))) best attempt at making whites black.
Dominic Powell
This.
Isaac Adams
Knew that was coming. unfortunately I drank the whiskey and we share a cabin with three people for work
Julian Reyes
Watch this video OP:
Carter Howard
Are biological differences responsible for the disparity between state level societies in Africa and Europe?
Jack Perez
THAT'S JUST THE THING THOUGH. "Scientific Racism" wasn't discarded because it wasn't true (as is usually asserted) but because after WW2, it became too politically hot to handle. Cripplechan's /polarchive/ has a full dossier on how modern population genetics is confirming what the scientists from the 20th century already knew, but nobody wants to put the pieces together (in public) because the conditioned response to accusations of racism is too strong to overcome without hard, hard evidence.
Exactly; the liberal's denial of reality has gotten so extreme that they will completely disregard the words of the scientist who literally discovered DNA because he doesn't support their ideology.
Aiden Jones
archive.4plebs.org
a good thread regarding
Carson Richardson
I saw my dad watching history channel talking about DNA and discoveries of civilization near the Black Sea predating the Levant, and I really wanted to tell him that I knew all of this, and that's who Hitler was referring to when he meant Aryans, these Indo-Europeans. But I felt that even though he is conservative, he's more libertarian conservatism than racial realism.
The documentary didn't even use the words "Indo-European" though :(.
Lincoln Scott
Even national geographic had a big story on twins recently. It's been more or less proven that preferences are genetically linked. Watch brainwash if you want a visually appealing movie on it, it's 6 parts though. It goes over why children of drinkers tend to drink, smoke etc. The old theory was that children mirrored bad habits of parents but the genes for liking bad habits get passed down. People who like alcohol make children who like alcohol etc...The national geographic story even mentions how scientists are uneasy about the truth and how close it is to eugenics of old.
Luke Rogers
This and colorofcrime.com
Josiah Rogers
Oh, and this.
Carson Howard
Yes. Even among poor whites, the violent crimes aren't as high as blacks.
Grayson James
Call her an anti-science creationist bible thumper for denying basic biology and genetics.
>roasties in charge of science
Xavier Ramirez
Best not to argue about it with people.
I recommend you damage control and pretend you realized you were wrong.
Jayden Cook
This should do the trick.
youtube.com
Hudson Sullivan
As for the biological differences, take a look at this.
Angel Richardson
And here is one about development. Can anyone see Africa?
I've heared somewhere that in order to have a functioning civilization/society, capeable of development (not just a hunter gatherer tribe), you'd need an average IQ of at least 90. Africans are not even close to that.
Adam Taylor
weeeell. i wouldn't draw too many conclusions (that reflect negatively on groups of people), but rather redpill her by showing that the possibility is distinct: intelligence like other things is hereditary. racial differences exist in other things hereditary, ergo.... let her connect the dots.
Samuel Evans
>black IQ mid is 80-85
That's not how fucking IQ works you goddamn retards.
Josiah Wood
In animals for example, migratory behaviour is determined by DNA, the specific migration routes being "chosen" by natural selection. Those who have a more hospitable migration route and destination will pass on their genes more and eventually the genes which code for that route will become the norm in a population.
There's no reason why this couldn't apply to populations of humans, groups that are isolated from one another or otherwise have different environments will have different traits or behaviours which are either beneficial or don't put an individual at a disadvantage. In the case of the former the frequency of the genes carrying the trait/behaviour would increase. In the case of the latter the gene would have to be dominant.
Sexual selection could also play a role, a greater warrior ie. being more violent might be seen as desirable in a tribal culture.