Clinton supporters didn't show up because there was only a 9% chance Trump would win

Clinton supporters didn't show up because there was only a 9% chance Trump would win.

If we had a 2nd election today, Clinton supports would show up and she'd win in a landslide.

Did the media secretly want Trump to win? Is this why they kept showing false polls?

Other urls found in this thread:

foxnews.com/us/2016/11/10/boss-tells-pro-trump-employees-to-resign.html
twitter.com/search?q=grubhub&ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^search
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

it's possible, they're going to make WAY more money off a Trump presidency than a hillary presidency.

however, that 9% chance of winning would also make a lot of Trump supporters give up. The pollsters were paid by the media and pressured to show the media what they wanted to see.

They also might have wanted to discourage Trump voters to vote because of low low his poll numbers were.

Their plan was to make Trump supporters think it's pointless to vote since Hillary was guaranteed. It backfired.

Shit, with all their fear-mongering you think these people would've voted as early as possible.

All but one of the polls wer wrong, and the one that was right got more attention that any of the others.

Silent majority/Shy Tory Factor is almost impossible to account for.

This.

exact same shit they said after brexit. false stats are cooked. the stats you are referencing are false. hillary clinton supporters showed up to vote but she had literally no support in the regions that mattered.

Clinton supporters didn't show up PERIOD.

Most people voting for Clinton were illegals, dead, or their vote was changed from Trump to Clinton.

GG SHILL

People are at the "bargaining" stage of the grief process

>polls fucked up before the vote
>polls fucked up during the vote
>polls magically accurate after the vote

Maybe, just maybe their "do-over vote" poll is fucked up as well.

It was exactly like Brexit. People thought Clinton was a shoe in to win because all the (((polls))) had her ahead by several points and decided not to vote because of it. Whereas Trump supporters were willing to wait in line for hours just to vote for him. There is no second vote, they blew the first one.

Considering over 100 million people voted, this new poll is full of shit.

This is really Brexit 2.0.

>All but one of the polls wer wrong, and the one that was right got more attention that any of the others.

neither of those statements are true

>if if if if if if if if if

You sound like the faggot known as Obama

>did the media secretly want Trump to win

Do you know how profitable this election cycle has been because of Trump?

You got tricked. Trump was the man on the inside all along and they got him elected by stealing the Democrat primaries from Bernie, who would have beat him. Hillary was a red herring all along. A damn good one at that, too. Such an evil cunt. Completely blindsided me, until I figured this out.

she ran the most ineffective campaign in political history and will go down in the books as a fucking joke. Once you saw all of the Fl panhandle turn red you knew exactly how the election was going. She didn't care about those people and called them deplorable. If shes only rotting away in a rothschilds prison right now shes lucky, because they are coming for that 161 million they spent on her this year alone.

I was actually thinking this, we know from DNC leaks that they actually cooked polls to suppress Trump voter turnout but really it probably had the opposite affect by making the libs think Hillary was going to win in a landslide, what delicious irony.

No they just used shit prediction models.

People wanted him to win. People is source of power, not media. Don't forget about it, Sup Forums.

Never forget. Based potubro. He was ridiculed by ctr but never faltered.

Pic related

What if CNN secretly supported trump by making it look like he only had 9% chance to win because they knew people would not wait in line 2 hours because the win is in the bag

IDK how did Univision report this before the election? The Israeli owner of Univision, Haim Saban, was one of Hillary's top donors.

the media just reports on what they discover
there's no conspiracy

...I thought it was the other way around...that Trump was supposed to be a plant so Hillary could win...until it backfired, that is.

That's for clearing that up Mr. Bergstein.

It's always a pleasure seeing smug liberals crash and burn.
Has anybody saved the posts from portubro?

You guys are so foolish. Hillary was never gonna be the puppet, it was trump. A puppet with fervent support

democrats lie. they can't help it

they rule by stitching together a fragile coalition of weird groups-- fags, feminists, radical black, communists-- and say they're the "majority"

> muh demography

ALL BTFO

You sound pathetic jumping at imaginary boogiemen

you won, just be happy

KILL YOURSELF OP

The battle is won but the war rages on
foxnews.com/us/2016/11/10/boss-tells-pro-trump-employees-to-resign.html

“I absolutely reject the nationalist, anti-immigrant and hateful politics of Donald Trump and will work to shield our community from this movement as best as I can,” Maloney wrote about Trump’s supporters.

twitter.com/search?q=grubhub&ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^search
rev up those socks
You know what to do faggots
I hope grubhub isn't DDoSed into the stone age

It was a side effect of their attempt to create an environment where voting for Clinton is the standard, and Trump is unacceptable. They knew that Clinton would have no geniune supporters, so they hoped to grab all of the apathetic people that just vote as they're told to vote. Naturally, these people have very low turnout.

There was only one poll that mattered though wasn't there?

#MAGA
A
G
A

>The media was rooting for Trump
you're a fucking idiot

No, their plan of convincing people that Hillary had won backfired on them. Their lies and propaganda bit them in the ass. Fuck all of the pundits and shills.