Should economy classes be mandatory?
I feel like the new left that has risen is driving on a misunderstanding of basic economics.
What they see is "He has more than I do, therefore inequality, therefore socialism!".
There's no real intellectual substance. It's all moral spouting and virtue signaling.
I agree it's a retarded wat of thinking
But austrian school is equally retarded
>muh invisible hand
you have to find the middle ground when it comes to economy
It's kind of amazing that it isn't mandatory
Mandatory econ classes would just end up teaching marxism. What has to happen is the purging of left-wing ideologies from academia and mandatory teaching of classical philosophy, with an emphasis on empiricism and the scientific method.
>we have to teach people the specific ideology I like only
The invisible hand makes sense though. There's nothing stupid about it until you get to the extent where you're literally advocating anarcho-capitalism.
Funny how ethics is mandatory and that's where they also brainwash the kids by talking about income inequality in such dubious ways.
So what's the recipe here?
Mandatory ethics to feed them the idea that there's inequality.
No economy to prevent them from knowing why there's inequality.
So they go through their lives not knowing what or who...until the media grabs them by the balls and drags them along with them into socialist/communist ways of thought.
The invisible hand isn't a meme.
Self-regulating markets exist and work well. Government forcing it's way into business is demonstrably harmful.
But when you stop regulating businesses altogether they will just do whatever the fuck they want and that won't be in a good way, that's why I believe in the middle ground. The right amount of regulation.
I have been saying for 20 years high schools should have "real world" economics classes freshman and sophomore years.
Budget balancing
Getting out of debt
Saving
Investing
Building credit
Using credit
Keeping perfect credit
401k
It should be a mandatory 2 year class to graduate.
But this will never happen. The jews will never relinquish that power. (Debt)
>Austrian
>invisible hand
wow....................
He didn't say replace it with right ideology. He's saying remove all political ideology from academics period.
The thing is that..in order for a business to be successful, it's dependent on its customers...therefore, a business is coerced into adapting to the customers' needs.
The invisible hand is the power of the customer. It's your power.
Hell the kikes have been making fun of the issue of student debt
Don't worry about the 100k student loan goy, you'll get a good job after college, after all that partying and drinking for 6 years
In other words, the market will regulate itself based on what is actually wanted. That's self-regulation based on the people's needs, not what the (((government))) thinks the people need.
poor people should be enslaved. Paying them wages is socialism.
Poor people shouldn't be enslaved. No one should be enslaved.
That's why both the SOCIAL aspect AND the ECONOMIC aspect have to be addressed.
The social aspect being people's behaviors, attitudes, etc. Popping out babies left and right...immigration...drugs...hip hop culture..etc.
All of this poisons the economy, which in turn poisons society, which in turn poisons the economy...etc.
It's a cycle.
>Should economy classes be mandatory
Econ classes already are mandatory for any senior in highschool that wants to graduate. No one pays attention and its dumbed the fuck down. Its also only one semester, the next semester is usually a government class.
Businesses need to be atleast regulated in the way they treat their workers
I agree. Teach Marxist economics.
you are a fucking libtard socialist cuckold. Fuck you and you're "gib me dats" attitude you stupid nigger. Wages ARE socialism. Hands down.
Sorry, you're going to have to earn your living, by producing something of value.
Keynesian Economics are the master race.
By free market standards all media would be buzzfeed tier because it catches people's attention the easiests, that's the problem I have with it
>muh free market
>never mind monopolies
>never mind pollution
>never mind bribery and lobbying
what's it like being both dumb, and poor.
Every economy class teaches that voodoo economics is bad. You'd be trying to go against what you're aiming for, OP.
?
no but social justice classes are mandatory
>wages ares socialism
>paying people for their work is socialism
Are you retarded?
How will people build capital without the buyers getting money in the first place? What nonsense are you spouting.
>let me build a business when i won't even have customers because no one even has money to begin with
>never mind monopolies
The State is a monopoly. With guns.
>never mind pollution
Government is the biggest polluter.
>never mind bribery and lobbying
Lobbying only works when you have a Government to corrupt.
Cause it worked so well in Japan, right?
It's lost virtually all application thanks to the Asian markets and the oil complex.
If this were a free market technically you wouldn't be allowed to lobby
What the fuck are you trying to say? The Austrian school is the epitome of laissez-faire.
You seriously think poor people deserve wages for a job a literal monkey could do? fuck you, thats cucked and socialist to the highest degree. Why would a poor person even need money? they're going to spend it on porno and crack. Thats it. Wow, lets give all the money to the jewish porno lords and the nigger crack dealers. Thats how fucking cucked you are, that you want kikes and niggers to be rich and suck them off. faggot.
>americans
He's right, you know?
Giving money to poor people is a completely waste. They are usually poor because they don't know how to budget.
It might help for everyone. For example, I'm pretty sure that, economically speaking, Trump is a neolibral. I could be wrong--I got 12 in Econ 101--but his infrastructure spending is similar to the new deal, and he's basically just going to run the stock market up without any regulations. It should be interesting to see what happens with the interest rate and QE--I guess he'll be against QE, or for? Not sure.
you jealous that i'm american you foreign cuckold?
I don't even know where to start with this. Holy shit.
>MFW Swiss Mennonite background.
Also, every time you read a Swiss post, you level up on Sup Forums. Hence the plus sign.
typical libtard, can't argue with logic.
Free EXP just for you.
You know that winning the lottery makes people worse than they were before, right?
Giving money to poor people doesn't solve anything. Teaching them budgeting might though.
>teaching
jew
In all honesty, marx should be taught
>not teaching someone who's works have been so influential on the world
Teaching one school or tradition is dumb, and just amounts to pure propaganda.
>marx
>libtard
wew lad
If they taught economics in school there'd be fucking riots.
you're literally a socialist. go back to tumblr.
>tumblr
>socialist
None of your posts have been correct about anything (including me being a socialist)
How does it feel to know this little about such simple things? Just end yourself.
All you're knowledge is literally from internet memes
No but reading comprehension shouldn't stop at 6th grade and statistics should be mandatory so retarded people on facebook stop posting links with a headline that completely contradicts the stats.
if you want to give money to poor people you are a socialist.
they do though
at least good schools
God, YES.
(((economics)))
Asking colleges to teach economics is like asking what the Federal Reserve what is good monetary policy. They have an agenda.
I agree, the right wing needs to learn about what economics is.
What they see is TAXATION IS THEFT and MUH BOOTSTRAPS.
There's no real intellectual substance, it's all moral spouting and virtue signaling.
Sure. Bring back Shop, Mechanics, and Home Ec in high schools. Make VoTech schools not appear as shitty places of failure. When school counselors and college fairs are talking they need to not spit on the classes and schools that help turn adolescents into working adults.
Fun fact, Home Ec is Home Economics. It actually used to teach Economics on a household level as well as on a company level. The higher levels were more cursory, but they did exist. It was all about how to budget a household and how not to starve... before fuckwads took over and degraded into nothingness.
>charity is now socialism
it is you retard. it tells poor people they shouldn't have to work and that rich people should just give them their money.
Voluntary donations are not socialism.
Fucking mainstream economy is a bunch of religions. A series of dogmas supported by those whose ideology is supported by the dogma:
(Neo)Classical
>Markets tend to equilibrium
Austrians
>Government is bad, mmkay?
(Keo)Keynesians
>Animal spirits
Marxists
>Labor is the sole source of surplus
FUCK YOU. Wake me up when Economics respects the Laws of Thermodynamics and has a role for Energy.
lol yes they are. They are cuckold behavior to the highest degree. Anything less than the entire enslavement of poor people and working class is socialism.
I really hope you're shitposting
I really hope you never come to america with you're libtarded socialist ways.
Socialism is centralized redistributions. Usually coercive.
Capitalism is decentralized redistribution. Usually voluntary.
Donating to poor, whether it is cucked or not, can still be achieved voluntary (i.e. donating a few buck to a charity).
Thus it can be done through capitalism and socialism.
Now step off this thread, read Mises and come back when you're done.
charity is socialism. It's a fact. Doesn't matter if you're a voluntary socialist or a coerced one, end product is still the same. Not falling for your libtard shilling you leftist joke.
Fucking hell, you are so retarded. I'm ancap.
you're a socialist who believes poor people deserve wages for the work they do.
No, they just want what you have in Canada: single payer health care, higher wages, and a social safety net
topkek, wage labour LITERALLY IS CAPITALISM.
you are flooding the thread with shitposting
Inequality does not mean inequity. That's what they can't grasp.
I think the thing people get frustrated at is that people that work hard and smart do not get money for it, but people that were born rich keep getting richer even though they are dumb as bricks and lazy like pigs.
Or that a young kid full of potential gets some unfortunate disease and wastes his entire life sick, because his parents weren't rich enough to give him a proper treatment.
Higher wages lowers crime, increases spending, increases prices, and drives an economy.
It's not a coincidence that countries with high wages are much better places to live
Where I'm at ethics isn't mandatory. And the only economics class in my high school is an AP class (college level). I also agree that the invisible hand will solve most problems but then that leads to majority rule imo, which is why quotas are a good idea but can be abused like in places like Iceland.
I guess I've been out of school for too long (35yo), but do they not cover macro and micro economics in highschool anymore?
I graduated with a BSN (Bachelors in nursing) 15 years ago from a state school, and we all had to take a macro and microeconomics class. My professor used to live in the Soviet Union and whenever some lefty would talk about socialism or communism, shed call them retarded and prove why they are wrong. The lefties in my class were the same ones that failed every exam, never did their projects, and never stayed for the full 3 hour lecture.
I guess we should roll back the industrial revolution and get rid of every advancement we've made since then
This, but it's being taught or at least discussed in most places.
Agree. Pushing more potential into different fields is economically wise.