NYT set to start reporting the news honestly for once
>The publisher of The New York Times penned a letter to readers Friday promising that the paper would “reflect” on its coverage of this year’s election while rededicating itself to reporting on “America and the world” honestly.
...
>we're going to change things and report honestly
>we were always reporting honestly wtf conspiratard
wat
They're lying to you and this is another attempt at manipulating you into trusting them.
This is EXACTLY what a psychopath would do.
>Double down
>Double down
>Double down
>Caught lying
>Lose
>I'm truly sorry, please forgive me
>Immediately begins lying to you again
>Double down
>Double down
This is why you don't negotiate with them, and you don't trust them.
You remove them, permanently.
They will tell any lie, every lie. Anything to make you pause for a moment so they can stab a knife in your back. Once you know someone is a psychopath, you know they are an enemy to your culture, society, race, and community.
And the Media is a collective conglomeration of psychopaths.
Paper that lies promises it's not lying about not lying from now on?
Yeah, not gonna fall for it.
>tfw Trump will make journalism great again
This is why I wanted Trump to win. I wanted a whole paradigm shift back to truth and sanity. I love it!
too late niggers. I make it a point to discredit and talk shit about the NYT every chance i get and have for 16 years. get real jobs because youre finished
Yeah I don't know
>independent original journalism
well that's one way to call it
>(((sulzberger))) insisted that the paper covered both candidates fairly
...
Maybe they're gonna quit their anti-Polish policy.
Good luck with that kikes. Better fire bankruptcy
The MSM is in meltdown mode. They realize their time is up so now they are adjusting their strategies. They are a snake in the grass and a Trojan horse. We can't get fat and lazy off this victory, we have to punish them relentlessly until they cease to exist.
>(((Sulzberger)))
>Sulzberger
>Lulzburger
YEAH... now that the Obama regime is done. Now you can be journalistic. Sorry I see right thru the bullshit.
One-to-many media is dead. Many-to-many media now. Everything gets uncovered.
Hitler was right again
>implying they are being honest right now
Didn't they also lie about the Iraq war?
they'll all kiss the ring
Drain the swamp includes these shameful outlets
Okeefe, Alex jones and Michael savage are the blueprint
(((media)))) desperately trying to salvage some credibility
>infowars dawt com top 10 now
MAGA
Now that I think about it...
aliums disclosure
live
interview by alex jones
are we seriously on The Timeline?
Wow and all it took was mending literally Hitler into the presidency for the lugenpresse to at least pretend they report on news and don't editorialize about Overton window bullshit
fuck them burn them down
they need to go, a world without a new york times will be a much better world indeed
Too late!
WE WILL NEVER TRUST THE FUCKING NYT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!
>without bias
nice
Literally this
NYT have lost all credibility. I wouldn't be surprised if they go bankrupt within a year.
What are the extra bits floating to the right of him?
>And the Media is a collective conglomeration of psychopaths.
this so much this
everyone here needs to cancel their cable ro satellite service
everyone, burn it to the ground, cutting off their money is the only way they'll learn and you do have the power to do that
Sounds good, we'll see if it actually takes.
Fuck yes Canada. It's too late NYT....
Fool me once....
Are images broken for anyone else?
THIS THIS THIS!
DON'T TRUST THE MEDIA! GET OFF THE DRUG! UNPLUG NOW!
Everything this user just said
They're literally just saying
>Guys we should be shilling towards the undecided people instead of the those who already agree with us.
How about being bipartisan?
I won't believe it untill dean baquet is fired
They should start with chaning their name:
J for N.
Right. And if you're over the age of about 20 this is not the first time you remember America's self-described newspaper of record pulling this kind of shit.
I appreciate the NYT for some of their travel and culture features but their world news and political coverage has been tanked for a very long time.
...
>Still hoping to one day return
That day is sooner than expected
oy vey
>"ok you got us we'll investigate and present facts"
>ignores ongoing 5th gen warfare color revolution
4pbp
wow pretty nice
whats that stuff to the right of him though?
>gief monies bc
These fucking idiots know they are being forsaken because of their propaganda horseshit
And they are still claiming to report fairly
Yeah, they've really reduced the quality of their reporting over the last couple of years.
At some point the emphasis went from reporting what was observed to reporting what the editors thought about the observations.
This was a mistake since it dramatically dilutes the value of their paper.
This may have been a cost cutting measure since doing actual research is expensive and difficult but providing opinions costs essentially nothing.
Canada can range from having pretty gud posts to absolutely abhorrent ones. Strange country.
DRAIN THE SWAMP
what am i supposed to be seeing here?
A merchant's silhouette.
>nytimes.com
>I'm sincerely sorry that so many of us "fly-over" moo cow people got off our tractors and shotgunned beers on our way to the voting barn and surprised you up there in NYC, but we really do get to vote, too. And when we were honest, all we got back were accusations of Hitlerian sympathies instead of open ears.
>OVER BUDGET
>BEHIND SCHEDULE
Too little too late, cucks.
The comments bantz are godly.
>Perhaps The Times should look at the backgrounds - ethnic, class, educational and geographic - of its reporters, editors and analysts. I am guessing they're generally a homogeneous - and elite - bunch who treat traveling in America outside the East Coast like taking an anthropological field trip.
>The other issue is that, early on, your newspaper developed a narrative of what the 2016 campaign would look like and stuck to it even when it was shown to be wrong: Hillary Clinton would coast to the nomination and face Jeb Bush in November, whom she would beat handily. Bernie Sanders was a peculiar sideshow whom you ignored or dismissed until mid-to-late summer (as did the Clinton campaign); Donald Trump was an outrageous (but entertaining) freak who appealed to people who were entirely alien to your staff so you covered him extensively as a curiosity. In both instances, you missed the story - Sanders was tapping into the same vein of anger that Trump was, but in a more coherent and programmatic way and drawing tens of thousands to rallies day after day; Trump wasn't just a personality, he was somebody skilled at solidifying a base in a non-traditional way that your reporters couldn't see. In both cases (and abetted by the DNC) you were so beholden to your narrative that you weren't listening - and let the real story slip through your fingers.
>we're gonna tell you the truth now, goy-
>guys
Found one in the flesh.
>(((brooklyn)))
I can't see it
We're the same 2bh
Haha, for a bunhc of yokels, that bant is alright.