Sup Forums actually thinks he did nothing wrong

>Sup Forums actually thinks he did nothing wrong

He deserved his own trilogy 2bh

what did he do wrong?

Are those nostrils functional!?

gtfo

>reading trash like Harry Potter

This is why the white race can't prosper

>voldemort loses
>in 2 generations there are no more pureblood wizards
>wizard birth rate declines with more wizard/muggle marriages
>magic births become a rarity
>then one day, no more wizards
Voldemort is the redpilled choice. He might not be nice and sweet and friendly, but his reality is better for wizard kind than the alternatives.

Harry Potter is a book for children.

The characters aren't very deep.

>go to socialist wizard school
>everyone is welcoming
>"all houses are great in their own way"
>get placed in slytherin
>get weird looks
>people don't even want to know me
>only people that treat me right are from slytherin
>everything we do is looked down upon

and they wonder how they create dark wizards?

>white

Look at my flag, you fat retard.

but he didn't

normie!
reeeeeeeeeeeeee!

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for wizard children.

Did Draco fug his mom?

>be kind and tolerant wizard school
>unironically can't accept slytherin fags for who they are

REEEEEEEEEE GAS THE MUDBLOODS RACE WAR NOW

The only thing he did wrong was being in one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

not to mention that Ron and Harry are basically race traitors that get rewarded over and over again for breaking rules

Not Poland?

>Atlas Shrugged
>God Tier
Ayn Rand is one of the least talented writers in human history

hello Sup Forums

Trump is more of the Minister that Volderwhathisname took out before becoming Supreme Leader of the Magic World.

>ASOIAF shit tier

>this is the world drumpftards are looking forward to living in

Harry Potter is shit. Lord of the Rings is better in every way.

Les Mis is actually a really amazing book, and I would highly recommend it to someone if they enjoy French history. Read the unabridged, though, or else it's less philosophy or it's more of just a story. It's actually my all-time favorite book, but it is extremely long.

Fucking magic shits could not oppres even rat. Whole universe is so fucking stupid. Wizards shits trying anything would just end getting shot.

Oh, he did something wrong.

He thought he could compete with us.