Explain this, Sup Forums

Explain this, Sup Forums

poor timing
theres like one jani at certain hours that just prunes everything on sight

Thread B is a low content thread.

The same reason the Dobson threads due - even though I wanted to earn more about the Dobson horror stories from that one guy.

I don't have to, this thread will be deleted soon and mods will continue to be faggots who do their job for free.
>low content
>a thread about a cartoon character is low content but a thread about a sex robot isn't

Honestly I HATE Nicolefags and how they are obssessed, so they suffering makes me happy.

Top thread should also be deleted

Never browsed either but judging from the OPs
>porn
>furry porn and incest

>It's too tall

Holy shit, that guy is a fucking faggot.

>furry porn and incest
Not true at all

>and how they are obssessed
Like every waifufag

First one is a furry thread often with incest shot, furry threads belong on trash or Sup Forums, there you go, while the first did have actual discussion about plots for a robots and cyborgs.

Mods suck cock

/thread

Awww is that what happened? I wanted to hear stories from one of Dobson's "former classmates"

I dunno man, they seem to take it to other level.

>Sup Forums characters belong on trash or Sup Forums

Are they are the only waifufags you know about?

You know exactly well what the thread was about and so do I, they could have at least masked the intent of the thread with a subject like artstyle changes, characterization, etc.
Step up your game and don't make certain things so obvious.

You can check the thread in the archive. There was nothing wrong with it

That's correct.

By this logic half of Sup Forums belong to Sup Forums, /trash/ and/or /aco/

Mods really, really, really don't like any cartoons that incidentally contain animals.

Why?

proably idiots that idiolized WT Snacks

Why do the mods allow Chris Chan threads but not Dobson threads?

Or pizza party threads...

I think it's ancient holdover. Even anthropomorphic webcomic threads are extremely tightly monitored. In fact I think a lot of shit sneaks by the mods and jannies because they're in those threads so much that they miss other shit going on around the board, it's kind of nuts.

>one thread happens during normal posting
>the nicole thread happens when the servers are fucked and image posting doesnt work

>A thread happens during the time where people have to have normal discussions instead of spamming near porn images
>This is justification for deletion

>Or pizza party threads...
We can have them sometimes.
I've never had any of the /qa/ backup threads get deleted.

>the subjects main source of bumps is unavailable
It's a justification for why a thread would 404, yes.

404s mean deletion newfag, it wasn't archived from not being bumped. Nor do image only post bump threads.

Oh yea, when it was the furries that were the loud and obnoxious ones and the mods forget that this isn't 2006 anymore and it's outragefags who replaced them.

Furfag is for /trash/ user

This thread was deleted today

She is a toon, not a furry

I'm seeing a pattern.
Possibly one guy who keeps making the same blue furry waifu thread and ban evading.

Are you the retard Mod lover from the drawthread?

That depends, are you the ban evading waifu poster?

But really, I'm not.

That wasn't a waifu thread. It was a meme

I see a cat walking on two feet and wearing clothes

furry

Routine furfag deletion, but if true is bullshit, not a fan of screamball but this boards mod has always had an issue where they will delete a thread because of the chance of what it might contain.

Waifufag shaming was a mistake. Letting capefags like Redwood set the standards was a mistake.

Nigga why are you in denial?
Cat ears, cat mouth, paws, a tail, and a full coat of blue fur. She's furry just as much as Crystal from Star Fox is.

Reminder that this comic can't be storytime on Sup Forums or Sup Forums

That is Sup Forums's fault

Toon

>Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!
there's your answer. it'll die down in like 2 or 3 months. it always does.

One is a dime a dozen waifu circlejerk thread, the other has an actual discussion

one guy managed to do it a while back
it'd be great if some brave user could do volume 2 and 3 but i dont think they've been scanned at all

>my Sup Forums unrelated circlejerk is fine because we talk about how much women suck instead of wasting time talking about cartoons

The premise of the OP says otherwise. Not his fault the conversation can divert. Fuck you, and your Raven threads too

OP's "premise" was just an excuse for yet another sex doll thread It's literal spam

Waifufags are the heart of Sup Forums you newfag

I like how the Toph thread was just cropped lewds

>implying

First post encourages discussion, or at least pretends to.

The second thread was shit for two reasons:
1. It was posted during the day when you couldn't upload images to Sup Forums. Thus, you wouldn't be able to post pics of your stupid cat waifu.
2. It is a low quality thread. You know full fucking well that those kinds of threads are meant to post borderline nsfw content and nothing else. The post has no prompt for discussion other than "Can you guys post pictures I can sadly jack off to?" For once, Sup Forums's mods weren't shit

Yet Raven and Avatar girls threads are allowed

First thread is a thinly veiled thread. Sex dolls aren't .

This

>thread a) asking for people to come up with ideas
>thread b) look at my waifu guys!!!

nigga

pls

no they are the heart of Sup Forums and maybe Sup Forums but im not a trash ass weeb so I wouldnt know.

/x/ doesnt have waifu threads. /ic/ doesnt have waifu threads. plenty of boards are above this pathetic garbage.

>and maybe Sup Forums
Fucking newfag

hey i deliberately said I dont go there so I wouldnt know.

I just expect this kind of garbage from weeaboos. I mean the word "waifu" is supposed to be japanglish for god sake

Right and the Nicole thread is a thinly veiled image dump fap thread with even less conversation material

>I don't go there
It doesn't matter. It's basic IB culture.

Holy shit you are fucking stupid

Not sure, but what I do know based on that picture is that no matter what, Sup Forums's going to find something to bitch about

>WAAH MY FURFAG FAP THREAD GOT DELETED!
Cry me a river, bitch. And fuck your meta thread too. Why don't you go request some more Nicole shit in the drawthread while you're at it so that can get deleted too

>thread a) low effort excuse to post about some random sex robot
>thread b) an actual cartoon character
You're a smart one

The thread was made when the images' server was dead, braindead shitposter. And even when everything is normal, threads about nicole aren't image dumps.

Yeah, they're about incest porn, you degenerate furfaggot.

>you are supposed to discuss meta threads on /qa/
>oh whats that /qa/ is just a /jp/ spinoff and no one actually discusses meta threads
>lol too bad enjoy your ban for being offtopic
Im enjoying Tangled fite me

Post Callie!

can't because arbitrary reasons no one really cares about

>A attempts to induce discussion
>B exists for circlejerking
Don't pretend like there was anything to talk there.

>you can't talk about cartoon characters
>it's only discussion if I like it
Cool dude, we get it. What you do for free in your spare time is your business.

Trash is basically the furry board and no one will ever convince me other wise.

Are you blind or retarded? Look at the OP image and tell me which one specifically asks for discussion.

This is without even going into the fact that sexbot threads don't consistently shit up the catalogue on a daily basis. They're both shit threads, but sexbots are a dry poo that doesn't require wiping while your furfag shit is chronic diarrhea.

Well that's a flat out lie. Practically ever post I see with that stupid blue cat is incest related

Honestly tell me if there was any intention of a discussion being had in that Nicole thread when it was made beyond
>I like Nicole!
>Me too!
>Yay!

>furry porn and incest
The only image in that thread was the picture in the OP, image posting was broken at the time,
Are you fucking retarded, were you even in the fucking threads you absolute moron, at least have the dignity to fucking check the archives before you stay stupid shit like this, it was plainly obvious that the post was an excuse to talk about the non-Sup Forums sex robot, and that's exactly what happened in the fucking thread.

>"lets talk about an actual cartoon character we like on the comics and cartoon board at a time when images can't be posted even though there'd be nothing wrong with it if there were considering this is the cartoon section of an imageboard"
>"how fucking dare you, how dare you post images of an actual cartoon character on the cartoon and comics board"

>"hey guys look at this sex robot that has nothing to do with any cartoon or comic"
>"Ah yes, finally, a true attempt at discussion on this imageboard."

Why do you do it user, you're not getting paid.

Well that's a flat out lie.

You're a persistent shitposter, I'll give you that. You use good bait tactics like responding to others' posts while not addressing the valid points they make. I also appreciate that you've committed yourself to the role of Furry-shitposting-thread defender. Bravo

>Furry-shitposting-thread
Except it wasn't that at all.

>while not addressing the valid points they make
We'll see when you make one, ey?
>Furry-shitposting-thread
>in a thread with only three images, one being the OP and others being ASCII
Yep, everyone just wanted to fap, that's what that thread was made at that time for.

You know there are jobs that actually give you money right?

>defending a cartoon in a cartoons board is shitposting
The state of the newfags