Are we really gonna have the media bagging on Trump for 4 fucking years. Holy shit does this get annoying

Are we really gonna have the media bagging on Trump for 4 fucking years. Holy shit does this get annoying

Other urls found in this thread:

nationalreview.com/article/442155/donald-trump-executive-power-left-loves-constitutional-checks-balances-again
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Yes. I guess they haven't learned yet. They're just doubling down.

what else can they do

LETS FUCKIN HOPE SO. dum drumpf

not as annoying as kirino

They won't be laughing when they all get sued out the ass for defamation

Yes.

The left and their media mouthpieces are hypocritical scum.

nationalreview.com/article/442155/donald-trump-executive-power-left-loves-constitutional-checks-balances-again

SJW's always lie, SJW's always project, SJW's always double down.

This isn't news. It's straight out of their own playbook

>post yfw Trump just keeps ignoring the lying mainstream media, and instead makes announcements trough streams and visits alternative medias like Infowars.

My little Trump supporter can't be this cute.

Yeah, the MSM is liberally biased so they are just going to slam him day in and day out for the next 4 years.

...

It's annoying, but let them cry for 4 years straight. They'll be beaten even worse since obviously they're not spending any time or resources determining how to win elections.

>he won't just tweet his executive orders

>donald trump rally
>go to alex jones channel live stream with 14,000,000 viewers
>he's sitting on a platform raised above the crowd front and center to the main speakers podium,
>$10k suit, rings on each finger, talking calmly with celebs
>go to cnn live stream for kicks, ~1300 people
>some runt muslim cameraguy is 2 football fields away from the podium in a dress shirt and tie, trying to get closer
>"cnn sucks" chants follow so you cant hear what he's saying, really shaky video as the camera guy gets shoved around
>camera finally falls to the ground with a crack, screen goes black
>feed goes back to mrs. manjaw at the newsdesk
>"rahij? it looks like we've lost signal. we go now live to one local grandma who is not watching the rally today for her thoughts on trump..."
>chatbox floods with "OHHHH NOOOOO THAT SUUUCKS"
>mfw

Ten minutes ago, somber progressives were lecturing Donald Trump over his “Make America Great Again” slogan. “America,” they sniffed, is already great. Five minutes later, out came the “Fuck AmeriKKKa!” signs and American flags were being burned in the streets.

Ten minutes ago, Democrats were fretting that Donald Trump and his partisans would refuse to concede defeat, and insisting that Trump must make a dramatic public commitment to personally working toward a peaceful transfer of power. (Well, he did.) There were whispers of political violence, of riots in the streets, arson, smashed windows, violent assaults. Five minutes later, all of that came to pass — perpetrated by progressives in reaction to Trump’s winning the election fair and square.

Ten minutes ago, Democrats were complaining that Trump’s talk of “rigged” elections undermined faith in democracy and in the legitimacy of the United States government. Five minutes later, Democrats were complaining that the elections were rigged against them by an electoral system that treats the states as states — entities with political interests of their own — rather than as administrative subdivisions of the federal government. With their candidate set to lose the presidency in spite of her being projected to win the most individual votes, Democrats once again turned their rage upon the American constitutional order itself, and out came the signs: “America Was Never Great!”

>

This.

Prove them wrong for the benefit of anyone listening, but never imagine you can persuade them. They're not looking to debate, much less are they searching for the truth. They just want to destroy you.

I worked for a newspaper in the mid 2000s when the recession was just about to finish off what technology had undermined and nearly destroyed.

If you visit websites, you might notice that they all have video (annoyingly because it's almost always autoplay) of sports highlights. Those are actually produced by the leagues themselves, reacting to the fact that newspapers no longer employ enough reporters to cover their leagues.

In effect, the sports teams being covered are themselves sending "news" to the paper for free, and the paper runs it on their website because it's popular, it's free and their readers want to know who won anyway.

This is the last phase of media, when there's not even the illusion, the impartiality of Company X buying an ad which pays the salary of Reporter Y who covers Company X. They're literally sending the news and the paper is publishing it verbatim.

Trump could do this, and should do this. It would cost peanuts to have a couple of video editors to make short, attractive packages for TV & websites (rather than the big streams of Agriculture Subcommittee meetings that you see from C-Span).

Destroy by calling someone 10+ different words, that, a lot of times, have nothing to do with the subject. They'll even make new "insults," on the spot just to "prove you wrong."

Trump is going to create rules for the media. He will end up owning them all.

>and the paper runs it on their website because it's popular, it's free and their readers want to know who won anyway.

There is no problem with this as long as it's news only.

State of the world 1: 100 newspapers each have a sports reporter covering various leagues.

State of the world 2: 10 leagues have a sports reporter each producing basic game facts and sending it to the stations.

Unless there is a need due to controversy, why should all newspaper have its own sports "commentator" whose only job is to sit with a hundred other commentators all writing fairly similar things?

I still hate that fucking problem