Cold Fusion.
Why aren't we doing it?
Cold Fusion
Sebastian Sullivan
Liam Miller
There is a conspiracy against the idea of muon catalyzed fusion. No money = no research, but people are doing it slowly
Juan Cook
Basically this. Tons of amateurs are trying it now. YouTube has a plethora of people attempting it and getting net positive output. However none that I've seen have the equipment to properly measure the reaction, the creation of helium, and a host of other key symptoms of a nuclear reaction taking place.
Jaxson Wood
Because it doesn't work
Aiden Hill
This, but it might one day. Apparently, they figured it out by the time of Star Trek: Into Darkness.
You might say that's complete and utter bullshit and they just associated cold fusion with the freeing effect of the bomb and they had that much contempt for the audience, even though that makes no sense, but if it could happen in Star Trek, it might work for us,
Ethan Turner
I must be blind. Pardon me, I thought this was /pol
Nathaniel Gutierrez
Science can be political.
The moon.
Charles Edwards
the jews
Ian Walker
What about Hot Fusion
Hunter Gray
>falling for the fusion jew
Doesn't work
Logan Bell
...
Parker Fisher
>Hot Fusion
Normal fusion is a bit more complicated, cold fusion is backyard science compered to cold fusion like a steam engine really.
Daniel Flores
see
Gabriel Sanchez
Because you haven't designed a fusion reactor compression chamber around the correct type of platonic solid yet. I am actually astounded by how long materialists have fumbled on this simple design priority. The more Isotropic the better, that is your only hint. Cold or not, fusion should have been simple for you. I shouldn't have to explain this to you.
Luis Sullivan
Global warming is a scam.
Isaiah Flores
Because we don't know how.
It may not even be possible.
The laws of nature don't rule it out but if a guy ever did find out how to do it he'd put Einstein, Feynman and Newton to shame.
Landon Foster
>The moon.
Didn't happen, Jimbo.
Benjamin Butler
>Jimbo
Alright. K.
Nolan Rivera
People are, but funding is once bit, twice shy.
Kevin Martin
The memedrive doesn't work.
And yet it moves.
Kevin Rodriguez
The oil jews are sabotaging the effort
Lincoln Baker
The key is Browns Gas Hho there are many states beneath the current state of gas. Implosion.
Xavier Perez
because ZPE (zero point energy) is what (((they))) are really hiding from us. get distracted
Oliver Walker
You are missing some enriched Uranium rods in your sketch.
Ryder Powell
No money because of >muh renewables.
Same reason why we are still using pressurized water reactors.
Connor Foster
Bumpan for interest.
Jonathan Green
belongs on /sci
Henry Stewart
EMC2 Fusion Development Corporation
emc2fusion.org
Polywell blog, theres lots of other stuff there now, and news about polywell is a slow trickle.
talk-polywell.org
Polywell Fusion Reactor/ Electrostatic confinement Fusion, proven feasible by Dr R.W. Bussard prototype WB6, RIP.
Bussard is not a career scientist TOKAMAC money-sucking slob wasting government money on fusion approaches that will enver be feasible. He makes this clear in his Should Google Go Nuclear speech.
Bussard was old-school you will see.
Simple design and economically feasible, unlike TOKAMAC
youtu.be
Benefits of Polywell/IEC fusion, basic worth if you held the patent, and his funding history in the navy
youtu.be
This speech was made after US navy cancelled his funding/ embargo lifted. The WB6 prototype vaporised itself before he coud do a peer review, in 2006.
Since then the US NAVY has refunded his efforts but he passed away. Prototype WB7 was built and proved Bussard's claim of fusion by successful confinement of electrons in core.
Now the technology is peer-reviewed, and the team is looking for investors. I think they need $30 mil to build the most basic net-power proof-of-concept, as the prototypes do not produce net gain of energy. They need to go bigger.
Levi Garcia
This is only electrolysis of heavy water though. Which results in making heavy hydrogen I think.
Carson Martinez
>but it's not replicable
>"it's just hard and rare, I swear it worked earlier"
Lincoln Roberts
>YouTube
>getting net positive output.
>none [...] have the equipment to properly measure the reaction
Tip top. I guess this is real too: youtube.com
Unless you have a method of making tonnes of muons continuously and cheaply, this ain't happening anytime soon.
Tyler Roberts
Then why haven't you made one yet, proved to the world it's a reality, and made a massive empire for yourself?
Oh, that's right, LARP'ing doesn't actually do anything.