PUT-PUT-PUT-PUT-PUT-PUT

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The terror of the high seas!
The Russian bear that has Europe running for NATO
Holy shit ruskies, just stop.

>A Russian jet has crashed in the Mediterranean Sea after attempting to land on the Russian carrier Admiral Kuznetsov.
ukdefencejournal.org.uk/russian-carrier-jet-crashes-mediterranean-sea/

Other urls found in this thread:

state.gov/documents/organization/262836.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START#Status_of_the_strategic_forces_of_Russia_and_the_U.S.
dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-3635764/2-killed-gas-leakage-Indian-aircraft-carrier.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>The Admiral Kuznetsov reportedly deployed with 15 fighters and more than ten helicopters.

One down, 14 to go!

R-rule b-britannia r-rule the waves
>1 carrier with a ramp
>check every news about russian fleet
Sad!

We're closer to ruling the waves than you.

>His country goes from being a superpower to weaker than the UK in just 20 years

What Russia lacks in carriers, it makes up in shit tons of nuclear warheads.

what are you talking about, royal navy currently has no carriers. neither the air wing nor order escort even if they had one.

Ye coz we've always been a continental empire, we never had a strong fleet. But what happend to what once was the strongest colonial empire with the strongest fleet is just beyond sadness. You've become a loyal dogs to ones who humiliated u like countless times.

Aircraft carrier or not, your true enemy is drunk pilots and aviation standards apparently.

Also pity you have to buy american tanks, cause again, u were the ones who invented them.

>PUT-PUT-PUT-PUT-PUT-PUT

I dont get this english onomatopoeia

I'll settle for second most powerful military in NATO just fine.
I bet your nuclear missiles wouldn't even fire if you tried.
Now Putin has half a friend in the US you could maybe do a trade deal for some of pic related.

No it doesn't

state.gov/documents/organization/262836.pdf

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START#Status_of_the_strategic_forces_of_Russia_and_the_U.S.

>I'll settle for second most powerful military in NATO
That would be turkroaches.

You would know about going from superpower to shit in a few years.

...

>What is the Challenger 2?

Can't see it no your pic sorry brah :^)

A FUCKING RAMP!!

This floating ecological disaster.

That was because we sacrificed our empire to save democracy in WW2, a noble act. You guys just mismanaged your economies and invaded Ukraine for no reason.

>1800 warheads isn't enough
:^)

What do you think is on the bottom right of that picture in
Jesus I know it's got it's desert camo on but I didn't think it was so effective against your drunken haze

Baby navies are very cute!

it's a shitty running engine

Sound of a struggling/weak engine or a lawn mower.

How's the wall building going?
>Donald Trump says parts of the wall between Mexico and the US will actually be a fence

>A fucking fence.

LOL then why the fuck it looks like a fucking abrams?

Would you really fight for the EU?

I guess you could use their land as a strategic buffer against the inevitable Red Horde invasion onto the Queen's land across the channel, but you know those inland cucks will be expecting you alongside the US to cover them.

At least let them take a beating first, to remind themselves sand shore up your own colony count again.

Pretty well, considering that the fenced parts have a fucking mountain underneath them
Oh wait that's right Brits have never seen what a mountain looks like
Just imagine a really really big hill

wew lad

>type 45
no cruise missiles, no strike capabilities, strictly anti-air destroyer
>astute
armed with obsolescent 1970s tomahawks
>f-35
disastrous boondoggle in perpetual developmental limbo. the vtol version basically destroys carrier deck
>challenger
first western tank to get frontally penetrated by an rpg. what's worse, britcucks no longer have tank industry to replenish the losses or come up with replacement
>elizabeth hms
ain't even operational until next decade. again, no air wing or enough surface ships to provide it with escort order

peter the great alone is worth more than the entire british surface navy. come back when you have missile cruisers, or at least a fucking carrier to be embarrassed about

Because of the angle of the photo.

it's a wall in the cites and a fence in the middle of nowhere dumbfuck

>doesn't use sensible materials for a massive project

>fails

this is why liberals suck, they don't actually have skills, or even sense

I'd even say because of the photo itself and abrams on it.

A

BIG

How long before Russia declares war on the Mediterranean Sea?

GUY

>former British colonies
>some of the richest nations in the world with high quality of life
>former USSR states
>absolute shitholes that are crumbling away with ugly buildings and poverty

>That was because we sacrificed our empire to save JUDEN in WW2, a noble act.

Fixed.

BOAT

>Type 45
World leading anti air destroyer
>Astute Class
Tomahawks, Block IV. If you don't know what the upgrades are you have no business replying
>F-35
VTOL basically destroys the carrier deck
woops
Specialist teams from across the Aircraft Carrier Alliance have developed the unique protective coating using a combination of aluminium and titanium, to withstand temperatures of up to 1,500 °C and is expected to provide protection through the 50-year life of the carriers. The coating forms an important part of the work underway to prepare HMS Queen Elizabeth for sea trials next year and flight trials in 2018.
>Challenger 2
during the post-invasion stage of the Iraq War 2003 an RPG-29 was fired at a Challenger 2 that was climbing over a ramp, the front underside hull armour of the tank which was not augmented with an explosive reactive armour package was damaged, the tank subsequently returned to base under its own power and was quickly repaired and back on duty the following day. As a result, the explosive reactive armour package was replaced with a Dorchester block and the steel underbelly lined with armour as part of the 'Streetfighter' upgrade as a direct response to this incident. To date, the only time the tank has ever been seriously damaged during operations, was by another Challenger 2 in a 'blue on blue' (friendly fire) incident.
>HMS Queen Elizabeth
Goes out to seatrials in 3 months

Where do you get your information from? RT?

He's right.

Stop antagonising the drunk Russian NEET.

Yes his country has a bigger army than us,
Yes we sold all of our stuff and have nothing,
We don't even have the infrastructure to repair or replace the 5 working tanks and 3 working jets we do have.

When world war 3 starts I'm defecting to the Russians.

>india
>egypt
>libiya
>kenya
>sierra-lione
>uganda
>zanzibar
??????

thanks for setting us up for success

former british colonies:
>palestine
>zimbabwe
>south africa
>jordan
I can go on and on

Tonga, Fiji, Western Samoa, India, Burma, Papa New Guinea, Malaya, Sarawak, Brunei, Oman, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, Northern and Southern Rhodesia, Tanganyika, Zanzibar, Mauritius, the Maldives, South Africa, Swaziland, Nigeria, Gold Coast, and Sierra Leone
>some of the richest nations in the world with high quality of life
LMAO

...

these are not the same tank, stfu.

>>palestine
what's that

Is this some kind of elaborate joke or new meme? They're out clearly not the same vehicle.

You're probably thinking of the word "put" as in "put that thing over there".

It's pronounced "putt", like "hut". It's supposed to be a really shitty low powered engine.

you should have seen them before we got there.
Not our fault the hun and the frog had to get in our way of civilizing the world.
Look at Australia and Canada, fresh pristine lands and wonderful societies there now
Look at India, half baked, like a collapsed flan, but it's far better than pakistan which is what India would have ended up like had we not gotten there.

You do know the one that's painted with a Union Jack is CGI right?

You go google abrams and you go find this exact picture among the first u see.

Just goes to show how shit Google images is.

YUCK
look at that photo. you would think it was taken in the 70s or something. What a miserable life, to be conscripted on that floating turd! its going to be HILL-ARIOUS when they have to tug that thing back to russia when it finally breaks down. Hahaha

What is this abomination?

It was taken in 90s i believe, so you're not far from the truth.

Which would you rather serve on?
A Russian ship
An Indian ship

India has a pretty decent navy tbqh senpai

Tough choice. russian ship will definitely have vodka. but I also love butter chicken......

Use your own eyes. They are nothing alike

Would suck to be in the wake of an Indian ship

Fuck off, kike enabler.
Your little kingdoms days are numbered.

I read the newer ships are ok but their ability to sail them is shockingly bad.
Dangerously bad
I'd have to go for Russian, salt of the earth and it beats being locked up with all that curry sweat.

Did you know, much like the sea is the bane of Russian pilots so too is poo the bane of Indian Sailors?
>An Indian navy sailor and a civilian worker were killed Friday by a toxic gas leak in the sewage plant on board India's sole Aircraft Carrier

You're either completly fucking retarded or just trying to troll this mess out.

So Crimea still appears as Ukraine here then

holy shit, Trump knows EU is in no danger.. that’s he’ll withdraw all forces.

I like ruskis though

Kek, Dunning-Krueger effect in action.

Challenger 2 and M1 Abrams are two completely different tanks.

They don't even share the same ammunition.

Forgot the link
dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-3635764/2-killed-gas-leakage-Indian-aircraft-carrier.html

Im not the one who can't tell the difference between two very different tanks

Indians practically wrote the Russian carrier operations manual, I'm not even joking. Stop treating India as if it is some 3rd-tier pushover. They are building their 2nd carrier to be nuclear powered with EMALS.

Now you tell me the differnece between the abrams on my pic from google and the tank on the right bottom corner from this pic.

The ruskies are just like the Americans: bloated balloon animals trying to act all tough and mighty while not even being a shade of what they once were.

Its the same pic you simpleton. Someone has been as retarded as you and labled it up wrong

Just because you typed Abrams in google images and got this which links to fucking pinterest doesn't mean its a M1 Abrams. That picture is of a Challenger 2 during OIF

MiG-29 is a shit plane.

That said, I didn't see you making a funny thread when a couple of burger Hornets managed to crash into each other over Pacific a few days ago.

>They are building their 2nd carrier
They're building it in as much as they've said they will build it.
It has no plans and the steel hasn't been cut and the jets it uses are shit tier as is their radar.
Not to mention using Nuclear engines for no reason.

One nuclear powered aircraft carrier is pointless, unless you have 4 you'll get carrier gap.

That is a really weird way of spelling France.

France Has
A fantastic 4th gen carrier plane.
A Fantastic CATOBAR carrier.
A functional nuclear aircraft carrier.
A functional carrier wing

Britain may have 10K tonnes more ships, but the french have a good thing going for them.

The Japs are only 100K tonnes off the Chinese so they are getting there.

cont , also I love how you ignored all the other pics and go hurrr durrrr, this tank, which looks clearly different to all the others must be the Abrams.

Please go jump of your commie block.

Do you see the website it's from?
>1000+ pics of tanks on pinterest
Do you think that is 1000+ pics of just Abrams tanks?
Just because you typed in Abrams doesn't mean every result will be an Abrams.

I'm more scared of a Russian navy than converted WW1 British destroyers from Muh Empire. Muh Britannia. Not to mention you have so many mudslimes in Britain that you're basically a floating ammo rack at this point. Any sense of combat and your urban turbans will explode. Muh Navy.

Ye dude i see google is rigged against glorious british tanks.

>A Fantastic CATOBAR carrier.
>A functional nuclear aircraft carrier.
Has one Nuclear carrier and therefore it spends most of it's life in dock.
They will have a huge period of time where they have no carrier, I believe it's about 18-24 months
Just having an aircraft carrier does NOT mean you have an amazing military or naval power.

Top NATO generals said that London can be taken within 60 hours by russia. You don't stand a fucking chance, lad.

>uhhh we can't go to war this year I guess, our nuclear carrier is in for maintenance for the next couple years

>citation needed
Luckily we have our Nuclear Deterrant.
Also what is this meme that Russians are blood thirsty vikings looking to invade every western country.
Stop falling for your (((media)))

Reactors are for powering EMALS, and for providing refuelling. How would you know the jets it will use? They might buy off the shelf F-35s. They have two carriers in operation, currently.

>unless you have 4 you'll get carrier gap.
What does that say about the UK?

>Google
>Good search engine

kys

Anons please. Can we stop this fighting and just come together in solidarity over being lesser than the mighty freedom eagle?

>reactors are for providing refuelling
Are you an Indian corner shop assistant?
What the fuck does that even mean?
Nuclear power means they don't need to refuel for about 20-25 years, but they still need to take on provisions for the crew and fuel for their jets as well as the rest of the fleet that defends the carrier
>How do you know what jets it will use?
Vikrant will use Mig-29k Until anything else is announced so will the new carrier
>They have two carriers in operation
No, they have one,
INS Vikramaditya which is a stripped down Admiral Kuznetsov, with no missile tubes.
Vikrant is still fitting out and they retired HMS Hermes

That is not the point i was making, right now the french have a fantastic carrier. The British have two potentially great carriers, unfortunately they are still under construction. In the realm of reality one working carrier is far superior to a floating bit of steel that looks like a carrier.

You say the Gaulle spends most of her time in port but that is false, as of September she is off the coast of Syria supporting the coalition.

>What does that say about the UK?
We're not retarded and our carriers have been build without nuclear reactors.
Keep your trophy meme carriers, we actually expect to fight with ours.

The Americans have 10, almost 11, nuclear carriers and with that amount they "only" have two on station at any one time and with 10 they still have carrier gaps, the next one is due in a few months.
Unless you can match them don't even try.

Easy to have a huge fleet when you live on an island.

Also belatedly consecrating the thread with picrelated.

INS Vikramaditya is a Kiev class with a ramp instead of the missile and cannon armament

>Britain
Fucking kek your navy and army is a fucking joke compared to what it was

butthurt anglos BTFO

I wish I could find an article from a us officer who observed on an Indian naval deployment.
Literal slaves on board
Nothing works
No maintenance as all senior staff are high caste and won't work or deal with low castes
Generally terrible

The queen Elizabeth class carriers are the biggest ships weve ever built.