Savages

Savages
Savages
Barely even humans

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=er8Q9bkOKcU
youtube.com/watch?v=-_4LhiX8ha0
youtube.com/watch?v=KiuBw_kj1-U
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Best mouse house villain song

>both sides singing the song at the end as they move to fight each other over nothing

KINO

I have waited eons for an opportunity to post this

it was worth it, user.

worth it.

Reminder the real John Ratcliffe did nothing wrong.
>Sailed to already established colony of Jamestown with John Smith
>Removed current governor for hoarding food instead of distributing it amoungst the people
>Democratically elected new leader
>Established trade relations with various native tribes
>Invited to a feast by the Pamunkey tribe
>They skinned him alive with mussel shells then burnt him at the stake because he traded with a different tribe that were their enemies

Sandwiches, Sandwiches
Barely even toasted

whenever disney touches "racism" the film is either very bland or offensive.

>the lighting on both groups make the Englishmen look redder and the natives look paler

Sausages! Sausages!
Let's go get a few, men!
Sausages! Sausages!
Now it's up to you, men!
Savages! Savages!
Barely even human!
Now we sound the drums of war!

What would have been the correct way to do it?

>They're not like you and me
>Which means they must be evil

Can someone help a brainlet user parse the meaning of these lyrics?

Not touching genocide in general might be a good hard and fast rule for the time being.

>the natives are just as bad as the settlers for defending themselves and their land lol
le radical cendrism amirite xdd

>friendly reminder the disney crew who worked on this movie wanted at least another oscar nomination

90's Disney was so radically centrist that they managed to piss off literally everybody. They wouldn't even draw Pocahontas with American Indian features for reasons that made sense to someone.

>See how I glitter

>not "barely even bacon!"
come on man.

>This is the film that Disney thought was going to be leave as big an impact as Beauty and the Beast did, getting nominated for Best Picture
>They ended up getting BTFO by a film they also made

Even when Disney loses, it's usually because they've already won with something else.

>Implying Ratcliffe wasn't right

Indians have always been criminals and drunks. The only thing the arrival of the white man did to them was to allow them to leech off of their hard-earned wealth through welfare programs and casino grants.

ah yes, the movie about lions fucking.

fucking lions.

Hey, if anyone knows how to write about Lions fucking, it's William Shakespeare.

Remember when this was a meme?
>That fucking scream
youtube.com/watch?v=er8Q9bkOKcU

2010s disney is much different.

youtube.com/watch?v=-_4LhiX8ha0

in the historical version the natives are unironically the villains

So this is what the cry of the cuck sounds like

>[REEEEE's in Algonquian]

The Algonquin language is still called Algonquin, although technically there's a bunch of different versions of it within the Algonquin federation, like Wabanaki, etc

DON'T CORRECT MY GREENTEXT

Kocoum?
More like Cuckoum

>When you remember you left something in the oven too long

Oh god these are cracking me the fuck up

Fuck off normies

he's too shiny

>In December 1609, Ratcliffe and 14 fellow colonists were invited to a gathering with the tribe of Powhatan Indians. The Powhatans promised the starving colonists would be given corn, but it was a trap. The colonists were ambushed. Ratcliffe suffered a particularly gruesome fate: he was tied to a stake in front of a fire. Women removed the skin from his entire body with mussel shells and tossed the pieces into the flame as he watched. They skinned his face last and finally burned him at stake[citation needed]. This story was documented in an eyewitness account that is included in The Jamestown Adventure: Accounts of the Virginia Colony, 1605–1614 (Real Voices, Real History), edited by Ed Southern.

Im so glad the natives got BTFO, imagine the possibility of those beasts dominating the world now.

barely even humans, you said?

>actually taking obvious propaganda as fact
come on now

>Yeah they skinned the guy who got rid of an asshole leader and traded with every native and settler equally but he HAS to be in the wrong, right... HE WHITE!

> [CITATON NEEDED]

The music in that scene made me remember that they cut out the second best song of the film because it made the kids in the test audience sleepy. It would have tied the thing emotionally together and gave the flat characters a tiny bit of depth. Should have gotten someone else to sing for Mel Gibson though.

youtube.com/watch?v=KiuBw_kj1-U

They invaded their lands, the Natives had every right to attack them

So if someone came into your town and just started cutting down trees and building a fort, you'd let them?

>Well Governor Ratcliff hasn't always been this glam!

Cabbages!
Cabbages!
Rotten to the core

No I'd ask them to stop then my wife's boyfriend would stop them.

Yeah but if you invite someone to trade, and then catch him and kill him by skinning him with clam shells you're the bad guy in the incident. Especially when the guy you killed was advocating for an equal relationship between the settlers and the natives.

>advocating for an equal relationship between the settlers and the natives.
And you don't think the natives had enough common sense to know that would never, ever, ever happen?

I would say the writing was pretty clearly on the wall that the white man was coming and was going to take everything. Now I'm not one of those "give them their land back!' faggots, but I think if you're fighting for your peoples' right to exist against foreign interlopers you're more than allowed to use "non-honorable" tactics.

They also skinned him alive
What natural right does that fall under?

So they violated the non-existent Geneva Convention?

We used to tar and feather people for doing immoral things.

>Yeah but they did this first!

Your bigotry for the white man clouds your mind

When will the live action remake be announced?

You're applying modern day war crimes to a time and place where they were unknown. I have no problem with what the white man did to the natives. I sleep at night soundly as American knowing we have the blood of natives on us. It does not bother me.

But to argue that the natives were bad because the tactics they chose to deploy while literally fighting for their existence weren't okay by modern standards is asinine.

>The proud natives were skinning people alive with mussel shells for GENERATIONS before the evil white man came with his TRADE and DIPLOMACY with tribes they didn't approve of!

That's what you sound like

>fighting for their existence
>invited a guy to dinner under false pretenses for daring to trade with the guys down the street

On the other hand,

>The nasty natives were skinning people alive with mussel shells for GENERATIONS before the proud white man came with his TRADE and DIPLOMACY that interferes with their local politics!

Because god forbid people don't just let their enemies form new alliances, they're just some stupid tribe, they should just shut up and get ganged up on. Oh wait you don't even know what the tribes are called.

Is it?

You realize that flaying has been a fairly common form of torture and brutal execution across historically white cultures as well... right?

>And you don't think the natives had enough common sense
No, they were retarded savages. Try to keep up.

You're acting like there was no context outside of this one event. That it happened in a vacuum. You're just being obtuse at this point.

God I despise minorities

White cultures were smart enugh to abandon such barbaric practices hundreds of years prior to landing on American soil tho

In 1609?

>interferes with the local politics
>literally not involved in any native conflict until they skinned the guy in charge alive because the colonists were STARVING

Brilliant tactics utilized by the Natives

What context justifies deceit and torture?

You do realize white people are a minority, right? Most of the Earth's population is Asian.

>in 1609?
According to the Wikipedia, Slavs were doing it up until at least 1657.

>What context justifies deceit and torture?
War has always justified both of those things, at least to those engaged in it.

Mine, mine, mine!

No they didn't. Look up the Thirty Years War. The stuff that was used to torture and execute people then was pretty fucked up.

Exactly, he hates white people

...weren’t you posting in a different thread this morning?

Your pattern and style is familiar as hell

So because the cultural norms of white people began advocating for burning at the stake and crushing people with fucking rocks instead of flaying, the natives were evil?

Sandwiches
Sandwiches
Barely even humans

Slavs aren't white nor are they people

Are you retarded?

...

No one said shit about the natives being evil, you implied that
People are just looking down upon, and rightfully, the practice of flaying unarmed, starving colonists

>These blond haired blue eyed Europeans aren't white
cringe.

It's the exact same style as the trannies on /lgbt/, actually.

Are you a tranny?

> X isn't white!
It's kind of funny how insanely specific white supremacists are about what qualifies as white. I remember growing up how people in my home town tried to claim that this one Irish family wasn't white because they were Catholic.

>he browses /lgbt/ and willingly admitted it

Definitely retarded

>Slavs
>Euros

Not even the Polish believe that

I can't believe he wins in the sequel

It's the same sort of shit people have been doing in war since war began. Stuff equally repugnant happens in modern war between both sides all the time. I personally find it pretty bad as well, but I just feel like looking down on a group of people for committing a war crime when your people are guilty of committing arguably worse war crimes over the centuries is kinda silly.

The Poles don't believe it because they think Slavs are superior to Europeans. These days they aspire to be discount Russians.

>white supremacists

No one brought THAT up but you nigga
Jesus christ, no wonder Sup Forums comes to troll so much, it's easy fuckin pickins here

>he browses /lgbt/ and willingly admitted it
I'm literally a faggot. I have no reason why I'd be ashamed by that.
That said, I am ashamed because /lgbt/ is garbage.

I'm talking about my home town, which had a big Klan presence when I was a kid. They were really, really touchy about what qualified as white. You insisting that slavs aren't white reminded me of that.

Well to be fair, when you start calling pasty skinned Slavs "non-white" what the fuck are you supposed to take away?

He clearly did something wrong. Should have picked the right tribe.

>literally not involved in any native conflict until they skinned the guy in charge alive because the colonists were STARVING
oh so you literally only know what you read off a wiki article
lmao this paleskin

You're supposed to get the humor but I suppose race jokes are verboten during Hiroyuki's reign

The natural right of get the fuck out of my property.

youtube.com/watch?v=-_4LhiX8ha0

poor asians.

This. Americans need to get over the fact their country was created with native blood.

Americans get extremely upset if you say bad things about their founding fathers. They've basically deified them.

...

Do some reading. Most of the trees were gone by the time any European colonies were founded. The Tidewater region was downright overpopulated by the time the English arrived, with most tribes living strictly on corn because they'd over-hunted the shit out of that region.

>LARPing as a non-white on Sup Forums
To what end? No one will believe you.

It's okay americans, Russians killed innocent children and women too in order to create country.
Hell, they ate innocent children and women. Japan did ethnic cleansings when it was created and they are very proud of that.

I'm black. My ancestors had nothing to do with what happened to the Natives, therefore I'll always side with them.

"Americans" aren't exclusively the offspring of colonists. In fact it might blow your mind to realize that all remaining natives are "Americans" too.

Bullshit, i bet you have European blood in your veins. Everyone has a bit of European blood just like every White American has a little bit of African and Mehicano blood.

I'm hoping mexican

>muh melting pot
Actually most people historically have stayed within their ethnicity for marriage. Please don't push your narrative on my board.

This pic isn't very constructive, as the author used different examples for the "good" and "bad" centrism. If he's so smart, how many babies does he think should be fed into a wood chipper according to the "good" centrism?