Sup Forums i want to overdose on red pill. Specifically about the gays

Sup Forums i want to overdose on red pill. Specifically about the gays.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jjPQ_jVlEnQ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_homosexuals_in_Nazi_Germany_and_the_Holocaust
mpcdot.com/forums/topic/6651-the-institute-for-advanced-homophobia/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

OP is a faggot

Straight men think having sex with other men is disgusting as a by-product of being straight. That's all there is to it. I only hate gays when they are overly effeminate and annoying, and kowtow to the SJWs, which a lot of them are like. These men are essentially partial women, and the social justice movement is a reflection of female nature. I am far more of a mysogynist than a homophobe.

gays are fine so long as they keep to themselves and don't adopt (rape) children

Overdose you say?

Get pozzed

this. faggots can be actually be bros, but i personally don't condone their marriage (from a religious, personal perspective) and think they shouldn't be overt and outright with their crap, but I don't really mind them having the same rights (bar adoption) as a married couple

It's degenerate, a sin, and is a sign of society collapsing (see: Rome)

It shouldn't be illegal but it should be discouraged by society BUT gay marriage SHOULD be illegal.

Also, 2 dads or 2 moms raising a child fucks up the child irrevocably

Gays go back to ancient Greece at least, but modern flamboyant gay culture is a Soviet psy-op.

youtube.com/watch?v=jjPQ_jVlEnQ

Fuck you user, I'll """adopt""" as many kids as i want. More boys, the better. I'll make sure they feel more love thanwith any other parents.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bo_n0IPsC7g

>leaf condoning gay marriage
Why am i not surprised.

sorry user, but having parents of both sexes is fundamental to a child's growth. children with mental issues incur a cost on society

>see: sign of society collapsing (see: Rome)
Rome and Greece were always homos

Data mining much.

Y-you guys missed my point.
He was suggesting gay adoption is child rape.
>Joke
>your head

oh :/

Well now i just feel silly.

>tfw im literally half greek half italian

>sin
kys christcuck

Here's a red pill: If normies don't have a convincing reason to keep working, society will collapse by lunch.

Fuck off fedorafag.

You fail to understand homosexuality completely but you are correct in that 'women' are the problem here.

This poster is close. The problem is that homosexuals are men who do possess more of the female nature. There's two parts to the redpill on homosexuals. The main part, what most people are concerned with, is why are people gay, what makes them gay, and what should done about it? For the normal person it doesn't matter, and acceptance of gays is the answer.

The second question is who or what is promoting/enabling homosexuality and for what purpsoe.

Liberals would have you believe that the only reason people support homosexuality is because they are loving people and even if they aren't gay themselves it doesn't matter let the gays love each other and do whatever they want. On a high intelligence esoteric level this is okay, but for average people is the wrong attitude.

There are many people promoting homosexuality, who have a vested interests in seeing a declining population, especially the white population. These people promote homsexuality not because they are loving, but because they hate white society so much they want to see it end and homosexual behavior is a means to that.

The main thing is that homosexuality is largely driven by environment or upbrining. Most, but not all, gay people did not have a father figure at home. Additionally, based on many surveys and studies, we know that plenty of straight guys have done gay shit with another dude. And it's important to note there is a difference between full on faggotry and jerking it with a bro to porn when you were 15. My point is, that many men have homosexual experience, but then have no problem being functional heterosexuals who mate with women, reproduce and perpetuate society.

The danger is those who exclusively participate in homosexual activity and have no desire to reproduce with a female. Society suffers as a result.

The problems I see with the idea of homosexuality being used to reduce the White problem is that 1. I doubt it would be very effective, and 2. it would result in a boiling-off effect, and eventually render the population less susceptible to becoming gay.

Now, only about 4% of the population is gay. Even if there appears to be more people who are gay now than in the past, this is probably mainly due to people being more open about it. There are no accurate statistics that I am aware of of the percent of people who were gay in the 1800s, for instance, so it is nearly impossible to study the frequency of homosexuality over time.

Natural selection would also fix this through the boiling-off effect. Some people could be more susceptible to this influence, assuming there is a genetic component to it, and would be selected against. There are other examples of the boiling-off effect in action, such as the Amish for instance, who have undergone selection for increased "Amishness".

Here's another: If Sup Forums memers have nowhere to go, society will be right wing fascist with RWDS on every corner to cull cucks before breakfast and for 1000 years until Sup Forums.0 is made.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_homosexuals_in_Nazi_Germany_and_the_Holocaust

I always believed homosexuality was a sexual perversion or fetish, we all have these. Homosexuals and others pushing gay rights is just their way of trying to justify and feel better about the immoral ambiguity of a disgusting fetish.
The more accepting people are of their fetish the better they feel because deep inside even they know it is morally wrong. Being disgusted by homosexuality and finding it immoral is a natural human instinct imo.

>Redpill on gays.

It is a biological dysfunction most often coupled with various other mental illnesses.

It is pushed in the media (along with feminism) to lower the standards for manly behavior so you have a bunch of weak fags/metrosexuals to rule over.

Breaking up of the traditional family unit makes people misanthropic and apathetic when it comes to tyranny.

homosexuality is a mental disorder and should be treated.

There, redpilled

Very good, upboated.

This

So I have two things for you about Gays. One is societal, thenother religious.

From a societal perspective: Gays want rights that straight people have. They want to be treated the "same". What always was interesting to me is this: how would I differentiate a gay person from a straight person? In my life I have met many men and been friends with many men who were eccentric or what you might call "flamboyant" but were straight and had girlfriends. 'Gay Culture' has taken this personality trait and made it into their own, they have claimed it. Thus a Gay can be identified easier, and in theory ridiculed easier. What's funny is that they have labeled themselves, admit they are different, yet desire to be seen that they are not. This also effects straight men: a straight man who may just be out there or eccentric fears acting this way because he does not want to be associated with or seen as "gay". As a straight eccentric man who was a professional Shakespearean actor for a spell, I assure you this is a problem.

The Christian view is this: we do not know why the homo is the way he is so we must plead ignorance. It is not a sin to be gay, if they are born that way it is how God made you (though I also believe it can be a choice). But i take for certain that homosexual sex or any homosexual act is a sin. Thus the homo must refrain from sex and pledge abstinence for his entire life if he is to be a Christian, just as the alcoholic must abstain from liqueur for his entire life while the average man, the "straight" man can drink 2 beers or drinks and go no further.

Read some of the stuff here: mpcdot.com/forums/topic/6651-the-institute-for-advanced-homophobia/

Baby's first red pill is understanding that there is no logical rationale for believing in a higher power. Don't be retarded.

Cool opinion. How about some hard data?

in the atheist worldview there is no free will

faith is the logical conclusion to the problem of free will