>What the fuck is DC anyway? They'd be better off calling it AOL Comics. At least people know what AOL is. I mean, they have Batman and Superman, and they don't know what to do with them. That's like being a porn star with the biggest dick and you can't get it up. What the fuck?
Joe Quesada, former Editor in Chief of Marvel Comics, said this in 2002 about DC Comics.
Was he right?
Considering the state of Marvel Comics versus the state of DC Comics, he was not right.
>the state of Marvel Comics versus the state of DC Comics
wut
What's AOL?
Nice try.
imagine how much bank kevin feige makes each time another marvel movie exceeds expectations. he gotta be richer than some studio heads. everything he touches turns to gold. he must get huge bonuses in addition to his huge salary
Goddamn Labberbro, working overtime?
But can Feige touch a Thunderbolts screenplay and make it good?
>doubting feige after ant-man, gotg, thor, dr. strange, etc make $$$
yes
Well Black Panther in three or four days made more then Justice League in months. So yeah.
Ladderbro is seething right now as he's trying to find some sort of retort he can reused.
he's right but marvel is just as bad with spider-man and the x-men
...
>Thunderbolts
that not gonna happen after the Fox thing
i love the mcu movies but i love dc's current comics more than marvel's. i'd say their succeeding in their own way
*barks at you*
comic books are those paper magazines with drawings in them that come out every wednesday
...
Is that a real tweet?
Yes.
To an extent. Superman has been revamped, what, seven times? That's almost once every ten years.
>AOL
Somebody put too much faith in Marville.
...
Not just that, but consider this:
Feige has proven to be the ONLY GUY who can make a cinematic universe work so far.
Every other attempt has been pretty shit. A lot of them just crashed and burned and years ago, like the 'universal monsters' thing.
DC proved that it takes more than just superheroes.
And Disney is slowly proving that they don't know how to make an actually good Star Wars movie despite repeated attempts.
Feige is the only man who seems to be able to get the mixture right to keep things working. Even if it should be as obvious as "just make the movies, you know, good" NO ONE ELSE CAN FUCKING DO IT, APPARENTLY.
I thought Jemas said that.
>Damon Young
*Jogs your memory*
Someone post the breitbart article
Marvel comics hasn't been good since 1993, coincidentally around the same time Quesada's faggot retard face showed up there.
That's blatantly untrue.
that´s because the others lack the self-awareness kevin has, it´s not advance science here what he has to deal here
Batman and Superman as far as films go for WB seem kind of hard to make new films about for some reason. There are a lot of expectations from general audiences and big fans of them about what a movie will be like. There are some advantages for Marvel to not have much in regards to expectations from general audiences in regards to new characters except for them to be interesting and amusing to watch in some ways. They even seem to have got many people in the general audiences to desire to see movies that are quite similar to past movies they have made. It's also helpful that Marvel have tended to spread out their focus in the comics on seemingly a larger number of heroes compared to DC at least over the past several decades. They also seem to have designed many of their characters around how easily they can be adapted to live action portrayals. I suspect that was part of the idea behind the 'world outside your window' idea.
It seems like they even made very large numbers of groups of heroes that only appear in a small number of comics just so they could possibly be featured in cartoon and/or live action adaptions at some point in the future. Although perhaps it was mostly just the possibility of making spinoff comics in the future based of them if they seemed popular or to make toys based on these characters even if they only appear in a small number of comics. And maybe the large number of villain groups that appear in only a few comics is a consequence of there being so many hero groups.
Either way, all of these rarely appearing little groups of heroes and villains and individual heroes and villains provide a very large number of possibilities of things that could appear in future Marvel cartoons and live actions tv shows and movies.
Marvel also has an advantage that they seemed to have aimed their comics at an older demographic than some of DC's most popular characters seemed to have aimed their comics at when they first came out. So as a result of this Marvel doesn't seem to have to deal as much with a history of campiness in regards to some things with some of their characters that they want to make movies and tv shows about.
I wonder when they'll finally run out of qualifiers
>Feige has proven to be the ONLY GUY who can make a cinematic universe work so far.
So paste a superfluous after credits scene to a bunch of mediocre movies and then derail the sequel to your most successful movie by forcing it to shill your team up movie with meaningless cameo teases?
Basically.
Do this people ever go to the movies?
I mean, it has taken a while for D.C. to get there, but you're right.
This is also the guy who pushed for Sins Past and OMD because Spidey being married makes him "old" and not relatable. Quesada is a fucking retard.
DC*, how embarassing
He can make money off from it but it's not going to be faithful to the original concept and he will go with the suicide squad route.
It's literally only because none of the other studios have any patience. They want to have a cinematic universe RIGHT NOW and don't get that it took Marvel five or six standalone movies to do it. They keep making movies that are basically just extended trailers for future movies instead of making, y'know GOOD movies.