(((evolution)))

Stupid kids on this site believe it simply because they believe people smarter than they know what they're talking about, ignoring potential bias from wanting God not to exist. They turn on their TV and believe whatever they see, then look at their magical hand-held computing picture box, grab their dick, and sneer to themselves "Hmmpf, we don't need God; what a ridiculous notion." They go on Sup Forums only to believe whatever's convenient or puts them above other people. They don't hold ideals based on their truth value, but on their convenience, all the while hating anything suggesting they're accountable for their actions. It's not necessary for these sub-humans even to exist; a bot could be written that acts the same way.
>tautology("Your " + strawman(phrase defined as non-existent) + " doesn't exist.")
It's pathetic.
Evolution isn't even necessarily not real, but believing in natural evolution without valid evidence is retarded.
>hurr but there is valid evidence. The smart people say so and I believe them.
No there isn't. Anything called "evidence" for evolution is circumstantial and reductive, such as assuming similarities between species are homologous rather than analogous, or assuming missing or non-understood direct evidence exists.
>hurr but there's no evidence for God.
Irrelevant, however, meaning is evidence for God; it takes a special kind of stubbornness to say there isn't any such thing as meaning, or that meaning somehow exists intrinsically in the material world.
If you don't find that self-evident, close out your pro-atheism and anti-Christian tabs, and read something unbiased, like Christian testimonials about why they came to Christ, rather than just assuming they're stupid. You can also look up logical arguments for God's existence, but then you'd probably just search for "[argument] refuted" and believe whatever you read, so you should probably take a logic class first, so you can actually understand what you read and start thinking for yourself.

I haven't posted on Sup Forums in so long but

>it's a shill who tries to get Sup Forums to not believe in basic science thread

Almost had me.

>>hurr but there is valid evidence. The smart people say so and I believe them.

>No there isn't. Anything called "evidence" for evolution is circumstantial and reductive, such as assuming similarities between species are homologous rather than analogous, or assuming missing or non-understood direct evidence exists.

Hey, guys. I'm a totally rational, intelligent being who is very skeptical. Oh, and my ancestors were monkeys. Pass the bananas.

Considering that you can't wrap your head around it, you're not rational or intelligent. Ironically the people least likely to understand evolution are the most like our ancestors when it comes to cognitive processes.

>anyone who disagrees with me can't understand what I agree with

If you "don't believe" in evolution, you clearly don't understand how it works and why it makes perfect sense.

>I was persuaded so if you weren't, you need to try to get persuaded again until you are

>transitional fossils

Evolution may be a sound theory but the lightning bolts hitting water and thus creating life is equal in possibility as God creating the first lifeform.

Post memes all day, it won't make you any less retarded.

That's not evolution, that's abiogenesis. Two separate concepts. I'm not arguing for abiogenesis, just evolution. Learn the difference.

Also that's a 5th grader's understanding of the concept of abiogenesis. Regardless if you don't understand evolution I'm not even gonna try that avenue with you. If you can't grasp basic biology, describing abiogenesis is going to be like trying to describe how a jet engine works to my dog.

This bait is of extremely high quality. It's exquisitely beautiful. Hats off to you OP.

>like trying to describe how a jet engine works to my dog.
Are you one of those people that thinks most of the population shouldn't vote? jw family

Lithostratigraphy is pretty cool. You should read about it some time my dude.

No I'm not actually. Evolution is so simple that a middle schooler can wrap their head around it. If you can't, then you're fucking dumb. It's very straightforward.

I understand and agree with evolution but something had to create the first organism. I'm merely saying that God is equally possible as anything else.

Kill youself dipshit

Nah. There are multiple explanations that are well within the realm of our reality including abiogenesis. None of them require some supernatural being. If we can explain things without magic using the natural laws that we know, those explanations are more likely than the supernatural. Very basic logic here.

Would you mind telling me the name to these other theories

B A I T
A
I
T

I believe people smarter than you know what they are talking about. However, I don't believe anything I myself can not mesure or interact with. Unlike you who believes in things because your mom and dad told you to. Im sure no one is smarter or better informed than your father.

The only reason why some Christians can't reconsile with evolution is they can't see their God resorting to a system of death for the creation, never mind that the biblical definition of life being the breath of the spirit has literally zero implications on cellular death.

Didn't Adam and Eve eat in the garden? Didn't they age already before the fall?

Okay then.

> tl;dr Christians literally don't know what they actually believe.

Panspermia

Also there have been sucessful experiments in lab environments where scientists recreated the conditions found in early earth's atmosphere (after studying old as fuck rocks and the conditions that formed them) and learned that our geology itself began to produce the first organic molecules. If you have ever taken a college level biology course and know how amino acids function, it becomes very clear that all the right conditions could have come together to produce the first self-replicating bodi3s and eventually primitive cells. It's all just machinery.

What most people forget is that there are exponentially trillions of planets in the universe, and it's only a matter of time before one gets extrordinarily lucky enough that all the perfect conditions take place for life to form. If you're interested I recommend reading about the differences between organic and inorganic molecules, the roles carbon atoms play and why they are so versatile, and how protein chains, hydrophobicity, and the polar qualities of water drive the machinery of life.

We are just giant rube-goldberg machines it's incredible.

Panspermia is one, there's even the possibility that alien species seeded our planet. There's even a midway between panspermia and abogenesis that could have happened. Organic molecules brought to earth by comets (which contain organic compounds) Multiple ways that RNA molecules would have been present on Earth 4 billion years ago.

Protip: Abiogenesis has fuck all to do with evolution. If you knew the definition you would know that already.

I love this board.

Sometimes, I wonder if there really is someone unironically posting these threads.

>basic science
>promoted by MSM
>untestable
It's the same kind of science that say some people are born gay.

>Irrelevant, however, meaning is evidence for God; it takes a special kind of stubbornness to say there isn't any such thing as meaning, or that meaning somehow exists intrinsically in the material world.

I like how you said a whole lot of nothing.

Yeah man, if you've been on Sup Forums for any amount of time and you don't recognize shills instantly there's no hope for you. Who knows who hired that guy, but his job is clearly to construct a method of de-legitimizing this board by spreading misinformation and poisoning the well.

Same thing with flat earth threads.

>Untestable
>every single piece of evidence that should be there, is there

This is why you live on a third world island shithole

once you understand how atoms repel and atract each other and can form molecules with ease if you give it the time its not to far fetch for example phospholipids that form the membrane of cells are really simple and if you put a bunch of them together they alone because of negative charge they have in one end and the positive in the other group together in a kinda esferic structure every other celular organ can be explain in the same way if you go from the basic elements forming molecules and next estructures by just the phyisical and quimical forces interacting with eachother and the enviroment they are in

i just picked the membrane because it was the most simple i could think off
a first living organism can form if you have the right conditions and time so the elements form the molecules that you need in order to go on from there

if you want to make a case that you need a god to make that conditions posible in the first place you can have point but it would be more credible to say that this god had influence in the laws of science that made life possible like electric charges and energy rather than the conditions to have a melting pot in said planet with the right elements needed

...

Don't have to try hard at all this is 8th grade science. Are you going to post fedoras if you think rain is magic and I tell you that you're wrong?

So believing in an ancient book based on myths and the beliefs and knowledge of the time it was written is so much better ?
Try harder next time ...

>Believing DNA is self aware

An argiemonkey with a brain wtf

Sup Forums acts redpilled as fuck but they dont know shit about what is happening on the spiritual plane.

All beings here on the physical are being controlled by beings on the spiritual. The battle for your souls is really happening

Its not even worth debating. Enjoy your delusion. Must be nice living in a world where you are always right, despite evidence to the contrary.

we /x/ now

Yeah ok bud stay bluepilled