Wait a minute...did we ever learn who the father was? When was the last time we saw the baby...

Wait a minute...did we ever learn who the father was? When was the last time we saw the baby? Was it never resolved or even hinted at? Or was the reveal just so forgettable that I...forgot all about it?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Hopeless
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20839043
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Anonymous sperm donor. She just decided she wanted a baby and so she got artificially inseminated. Then she started dating the Porcupine who looked suspiciously like the writer of the comic.

>marvel outing people left and right
>carol and jess are still straight

I JUST remembered she had a spider-powered son in Spider-Girl who basically has aids.

>She just decided she wanted a baby and so she got artificially inseminated.

Wow. That is a bad mom right there.

It's Clint.

This. I'm not asking for a committed lesbian relationship Marvel. Just make them friends who fuck occasionally.

>Just make them friends who fuck occasionally.

You're an awful person and I hope you die alone and miserable.

No they should be parents for the kid and raise them to be a jerk just like the jerks they are. The baby would be an emotionally unstable piece of shit.

What the fuck is that egg thing?

It's anonymous sperm donor who turns out to be Clint.

What does Narvel have to make it complicated? Was having a loving man too much?

Yes. Marvel hates couples, marriages and anything that imply a bit of happiness. But they sure love afairs and sexual humiliation!

>But they sure love afairs and sexual humiliation!

That's DC, usually if Nightwing is involved.

Nah, if Nightwing is involved there is a lot of homoerotism, female gase, one night stands and sexual harassment (if Midnighter is involved).

Why?

>Wow. That is a bad mom right there.
Hard as it may be to believe: it's actually WORSE than that.

Apparently she had a "scare" that turned out to just be a late/skipped period. And THEN she decided to get herself knocked up AFTER she'd quit the avengers and started running around doing detective work on her own. Which she KEPT DOING WHILE PREGNANT.

And then, naturally, she ditched the kid to keep superhero-ing.

It's like they sat down and made an actual effort be create someone even more self absorbed and less capable of being a single mother than vampire Jubilee.

Also someone mentioned that Jess ends up hooking up with someone who looks just like the author; but didn't mention that the author literally said the whole reason he wanted to have a baby in the comic is because he and his wife had just had THEIR first kid.

So we're talking Bendis Tier levels of self insertion/indulgence here.

>Apparently she had a "scare" that turned out to just be a late/skipped period. And THEN she decided to get herself knocked up AFTER she'd quit the avengers and started running around doing detective work on her own. Which she KEPT DOING WHILE PREGNANT.

Is this bitch fucking crazy?

Ew. Now I see why everyone hates nu!Marvel

Well beyond Bendis, man. This is some Marv Wolfman shit.

...

Wolfman didn’t go this far with pregnancy. This is a new tier.

>Well beyond Bendis
>This is some Marv Wolfman shit.
Did Terry Long knock up Donna ( and you're forgetting Kong and Kitty in Ultimate )?

Well, I liked this reaction image anyway.

Yes, they had a kid who was supposed to grow up into a supervillain before Byrne killed the whole Long family off in his Wonder Woman run.

>I don't even know this lady.

>This is some Marv Wolfman shit
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Hopeless

I don't get it either. If the writer wanted her to have a baby and to shack up with Porcupine, why not just make it HIS baby? They start dating, she accidentally gets pregnant, but they decide to have it anyway because they realize that they actually want it. Much more wholesome and realistic.

But she was so cool giving birth and then fighting terrorists going after totally-not-an-allegory-for-refugees immediately after. It wasn't an unearned heroic moment at all.

>who the father was?
From the thumbnail, I'd say Hank Hill.

Oh my fucking lord. Hopeless, you hack.

>did we ever learn who the father was?
Sure, in issue 005.

...

...

I can't wait until Hopeless leaves marvel and someone has Arcade kill Porcupine.

>I can't wait until Hopeless leaves marvel
Your mouth to God's ears, user.
>and someone has Arcade kill Porcupine
They need to go full Byrne on the whole sorry mess:

I actually liked this book a decent amount before the relaunch/baby shit. Man did this book fall off a cliff.

Not Pym?

Bloody hell, the art is painful

>Bloody hell, the art is painful
The coloring makes it look like some 5 year olds got into mommy's makeup when no one was looking.

Why do people hate on Rodriguez? I've never understood.

>The entire 8-month timeskip after Secret Wars was built around Spiderwoman's pregnancy

I really don't get why Hopeless has so much pull in Marvel

Pretty bad art. Borderline Henderson

His faces look weird. However, points to him for giving Carol a full figure.

You can't be serious. Rodriguez can into basic anatomy and backgrounds, Henderson can't even do those.

>Borderline Henderson
I'll allow it.

Oh, so it's face autism yet again. Should have known. Never change, Sup Forums

Because is below webcomic quality, perhaps?

Agreed.

It's a female solo, what do you expect?

Apparently the female brain finds this shit visually pleasing, or at least Marvel wants us to believe they do.

>Because is below webcomic quality, perhaps?
You don't even know what this means, do you?

>Apparently the female brain finds this shit visually pleasing
I don't think they care overly much.
Seriously.
There's a reason men WATCH porn and women READ porn typically.

Mrs Rodriguez, you're drunk. Go home.

My bad, the faces, anatomy and the way the """artist""" handles the shadows here are so professional.

Oh wow, it's... not an argument! Seriously, you haven't brought up ANY actual arguments so far, just weak buzzwords and now ad hominem.

>faces
Meme.
>anatomy
Pretty good, what's wrong with it?
>shadows
What's wrong with them? Don't just post a page and expect me to figure out your autism.

>why don't you like my kid's art?
>>the faces are Squirrel Girl Tier, ma'm.
>THAT'S NOT AN ARGUMENT!
No. No, it's not. It's an OBSERVABLE FACT.

I bet you're the same kind of faggot who thinks Quitely is bad because MUH POTATO FACES, aren't you?

>>faces
>Meme
I mean, it's not like the shit's not posted right in the mother fucking thread, or anything, right?

Are people seriously blaming the ARTIST for the colors? What fresh hell is this?

I mean that "durrr da faces r uglee" is not an argument in any way. Comic book art is there to tell a story, not give you a boner.

>The lack of understanding of human anatomy is a meme.
Oh, kid...

Bad faces can ruin a story

>complains about ad hominem
>immediately makes an ad hominem

I said the "muh faces" argument was a meme, not the anatomy. The anatomy is actually pretty alright.
>Oh, kid...
Not an argument. Want to try again?

No they can't. Not everyone has autism.

You have no idea what ad hominem means, do you?

>"durrr da faces r uglee" is not an argument
Autism: it's a hellova drug, kids.

It's amazing how you keep pulling these non-arguments out of your ass so consistently.

>I said the "muh faces" argument was a meme, not the anatomy. The anatomy is actually pretty alright.
And that is how I know you are a troll, nobody can be this stupid, even in this board.

Projection: the post.

Then what's wrong with the anatomy then? Give me examples, support your argument for once.

>No they can't
Why, because you say so?

>Projection
Another term you're clearly not familiar with, otherwise you wouldn't be using it, so leave the big words for the adults next time. Seriously, saying "HAHA YOU HAVE AUTISM" is not an argument in any way.

How the hell can FACES ruin a story? Something that can be caricaturized so much in so many ways? This I gotta hear.

>i don't need to give up dangerous behaviors i just need to BE MYSELF

>the baby's white and blonde
Huh, colour me surprised. I thought for sure it would be black as night, given the direction Marvel has been going.

>How the hell can FACES ruin a story?
Jesus Christ, I thought he was just trolling; but we got an honest to God autist:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20839043

Seriously? That's your argument?
>autists don't care about REAL PEOPLE's faces so if you like/don't care about this artist's FICTIONAL faces that means you have autism

If the faces do not properly convey the necessary emotions or are incongruous with the aesthetic then how are they not harming a visually told story?

desu you seem way more autistic by being so obsessed with faces

Read >>the baby's white and blonde
and automatically expected it to be about contradicting Jess' black hair, thank god you're just tired of Marvel's shilling or racist and not ill informed of the womans natural hair color.

No, Quitely's issue is that he overly details skin to the point it becomes incongruous with reality. "Mashed potato face," is an overly simplistic label for his characters frequently looking heavily wrinkled when it doesn't call for it. A rather noticeable example is in Pax Americana, where a closeup of Peacemaker's heavily bruised and swollen face shows excessive lines and wrinkles when the skin should be taut. Something common with his faces but rarely brought up is his tendency to give characters widely spaced eyes, compact faces, and large foreheads, which cause characters to look like they suffer from fetal alcohol syndrome or progeria.

See, that's a good point, but that's not what I've been told this thread, just that "the faces are ugly".

So it is Sup Forums's infamous face autism, gotcha.
Nevermind that Quitely is a master storyteller and can draw circles around Sup Forums approved artists like Benes.

Why the FUCK are Carol and Jess still straight

Because Marvel, despite how shitty they are these days, still have enough common sense not to pander to you faggots.

>REEEE!
You're not helping your case any, autistAnon.

I hope this is pasta and you didn't just waste the time to type all that in when you're obviously dealing with a 12 year who was only ever gonna reply, "nu-UH!"

The first argument isn't exclusive to his faces, it's just most notable there. Take for instance this drawing of Morrison; note the wrinkles on the top of his scalp and cuticles, neither of which would normally have wrinkles.

You're not either, non-argumentAnon.

As much as I'm glad this is a work of fiction, I'm sure there is actually women that are like this.

It's not pasta, but I wrote it with the intention of using it as pasta at some other time.

>Dat Anatomy
That's ... not how that works.

>but I wrote it with the intention of using it as pasta at some other time
Well, never mind then. Carry on.

...

Who gives a shit? I admire comic book artists for their ability to convey a story through images, not whether their caricaturized faces are pleasant to look at.

I thought that was Maddie Franklin's kid...?

Quietly is an amazing illustrator. Even at his laziest he is above and beyond the majority of new-er artist.
You cannot compare.

>Anonymous sperm donor.
Laughing all the way to the sperm bank.

It's from a mediocre edutainment show called Hysteria

>Who gives a shit?
Well, the dude you're so angrily telling that he's not entitled to his own tastes or opinions for one?