Who was right?

Who was right?

The guy, unironically.

which one

Hahaaaaaa!

Not the ginger pos.

LOL

LUL
Checkmate atheists

DAMN

First time I'm seeing those comics today, they are parody tier.

>work douche
Wtf.
How delusional is this writer? They could have at least tried to make the big hair guy look bad. He's completely unquestionably right.

Fucking savage

Neither.
She is a whiny cunt.
He is a smarmy douchebag.
Also separating a work of art from its context is not logical as such, it's dispassionate.
Being dispassionate can be the logical thing to do, or not.
You can appreciate the craftsmanship that went into a lamp made from human skin. But you have to consider that it will make you sound like a psychopath.
That said, the comic is obviously tailored to make her point, but she still ends up looking like she is looking to be offended at something.
There is a sane middleground between being constantly agitated and feeling smug about being complacent.

>He's completely unquestionably right
That's the funny thing about these kids of people, if it's right to just about everyone else, it's wrong to them. They've basically taken the concept of opposite day way too seriously and never realized it ended.

>How can you look at all the cruelty in the world and not just be disappointed in humanity
I stop looking at it and try to do good in my area of life. Put down the cell phone and think more of what you can do to make things better than being a douchey prick.
>to separate the art from the artist
That's a fair point and I'm amazed a comic drawling faggot of all things wouldn't get that, I mean are they ready for one mistake to get them destroyed and forgotten because they rather everyone be judge by their personal life over their creative works?

The amazing thing is... they're not. The artiest is 100% serious on these, its nuts. Thats what makes them all the better though since many of the comics just flat out come off like parody.

I gotta say, your message gets downplayed the more and more your art looks like ass. The main character looks like chuckie finster fucked Bessie from Mighty B and had a kid that's somehow both a four year old and a forty year old

>"you should be less satisfied with life"
>"because you think being happy makes people complacent and less willing to try to improve the world around them?"
>"no, because I'm miserable and everyone else should be too."

This is the entire motivation behind this gender nonsense.
They feel insecure about who they are so they slather themselves in labels and keep everyone on their toes to project that insecurity on everyone else.
>Their seemingly effortless construction of identity around their personality and abilities is supressing me!

The two points he makes aren't related in the slightest, yet the second is used to completely dismiss the first.

>I liked Paddington, it's a nice movie
>Dude, Harvey Weinstein produced that, how disgusting can you be to support rape?

That's the kind of legitimate outrage culture shit that's going on. Facebook is full of that garbage.

> She is a whiny cunt.
> She
user...

is this unironically the next step for someone agenda, here on Sup Forums? So he's right to say "i separate the artists from their works" then author proceeds to show dirty lyrics
but this is not the problem, since is humorous per se, is quite the allegations on the same idea in other threads, on different point of view, like is wrong to separate.

...

>who was right
Not OP.

I look at people like Jessica U and get disappointed in humanity

ahahah is good to see fresh things about genders

Wtf

>Sexual assault allegations
>not sexual assault charges

Goddamn this shit annoys me

Is that the discussion we are having?
Do we have to question the character's gender based on the writers genitals?
The character is overtly female, so it gets called she.
Any thought expended beyond that here is breaking your nose to spite your face.

*rimshot*
Besides giving off an air of douchery he’s in the right. SJWs have this purity thing where because a creator does something bad, it poisons their works and anyone who still enjoys the works are ignorant. Fuck that

Allegations and charges are the same thing to lefties.

>because a creator does something bad, it poisons their works and anyone who still enjoys the works are ignorant. Fuck that
If Jessica U made a music album you liked, would you buy it?

If the music album sounded good to me or had content I enjoyed, then yes.
Kind of like how I would never pay for these comics because the content doesn't appeal to me.

I don't pay for music, so no.

So what she's saying is she's perfectly cool with pedophilia because she loves Steven Universe and Rebecca Sugar has drawn Ed, Edd, and Eddy porn.
It's fun when people fuck themselves over with their own shitty logic.

Do not lump a whole half of the population in with clueless Hollywood virtue signalling and extremist idealogues.
Hell, even the feminists are a spectrum from people who know what toxic masculinity is and find there should probably be a word for the equivalent female patterns, to screeching harpies who think masculinity=toxic.

Whenever you say "[broad societal group] believes X and is therefore ignorantly generalising issues], you are guilty of the same thing.

uh ohhhhhhhhhhh

Are you fucking retarded? Go back

>Self insert is always rigth's slice of lfe comic

Don't be a moralfag user.

jessy pls

If I genuinely liked it, sure. That's highly unlikely though.

jessy thread?
jessy thread

Nothing wrong with some BL

I don’t think you defeat pedantic moralism by being more pedantic in calling it hypocritical.
You are just adopting a worse version of her nonsense here, a more impossible standard. And you know it.
You call her argument weak, then give a weaker version of the argument as reason.
Nobody has accused Sugar believably of anything.
And if anyone did, child porn accusations based on drawn erotica of fictional characters would get laughed out of the room.

I guess the guy but from what i gather there's not much choice about it. If you FEEL something different about a media because a creator's behaviour irl there's not much you can do about what you feel. Sure you can try and logic your way around it and maybe you'll get over it, in fact you should definitely give it a try, but there's a good chance that a creator's reputation will affect how you see a work (possibly positively, actually!)

I've liked Lars von Trier films for a long time but after learning more about him I lost my enthusiasm for his work and am no longer the big fan I once was. I tried watching Dogville again but I wasn't feeling it anymore. That's not to say that I won't eventually get over it and enjoy his films again, but despite my desire to invoke Death of the Author and ignore how I feel about von Trier as a man, my feelings still come into my viewing experience.

well user-kun...this is the real me...

You're beautiful...

Never been there, actually.
I just respect people enough to call them he or she as they insist.
Sorry if I cannot blindly follow your factionalist loyalties.
She's a stupid cunt, but she should still be treated as a person.

hehe

Exactly what I was thinking.

>child porn accusations based on drawn erotica of fictional characters would get laughed out of the room

Or get you arrested in UK.

That poor, poor mother

I think his dogma nonsense is just pretentious gobbledegook.
He could just write a stage play, you know?
I watched a great Moby Dick with three guys, a wooden trunk and a coat hanger.
Don't need no great fanfare around that.

Well, so does squirting and fisting in your porn. Or teaching a pug the Nazi salute.
The UK is just bonkers like that.

It's a tranny user, it ain't a she.

>respecting people
Fuck off normie (((your kind))) doesn't belong on my board. Kys urself fucker.

>so does squirting
Huh?

Why are these creatures always situated in coffee shops? Stop ruining coffee you fucking things

>pumping children full of hormones isn't dangerous
>permanently disfiguring chidren's genitals isn't dangerous

Know what I love about these comics? The person who is wrong is always white, never black.

...

...

I respect certain people enough to go along with their bullshit. If the tranny isn't behaving like a cunt, then yeah I'll indulge them. But if they're a piece of shit then I'll call them whatever the fuck I feel like. Respect is earned, not given boyo.

I have no idea who this 'she' is? But I do know you're an idiot and I think you don't belong here.

There's nowhere else lib arts majors can get jobs.