youtube.com
Like seriously, Trump compliments Putin and Colbert goes full on libfag. What do they gain from bashing the new President?
youtube.com
Like seriously, Trump compliments Putin and Colbert goes full on libfag. What do they gain from bashing the new President?
ViewsViews from other cucks
they know their target audience will flock over and they'll make more money by consequence. it's pretty obvious.
> What do they gain from bashing the new President?
If you haven't figured out by now that the mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the globalists then I don't know what to tell you.
The problem is they've completely normalised the behaviour of doing nothing but sitting around all day and watching television.
makes sense. They pander solely to one audience they miss out on another half they could potentially have
Well I know that globalism is a problem, but I wouldn't think they would have Cuckbert to push it
Look at the way they handled this election process. They are all in on the same message.
yeah but why should they make more effort when it could potentially hurth your already existing fanbase? they're in a dicey position.
checked. I guess all the rich bastards have something to gain if they hop on the train
Well they could just not be as fucking retarded with Trump as much and more people would watch them I'd imagine
There are 2 opinions on everything.
Problem with media like this, they'll only show one.
no because now that the libtards are aso shocked by trump victory they can make ashit load of money by thumbling down on trump.
exactly, and it's asinine
it'd be great if Trump could end them
> The CIA says clearly: Russia hacks the democrats
So what? Is this the reason for Trump hate Russia?
The wealthy people are not hopping onto the train user, they are the trains engineer.
Because they shilled for hillary for the past few months. The only people who still watch this shit are hillary supporters. People who feel better about themself when they see trump bashed. They are pandering to their audience.
If you think these shows are all about (your) entertainment, then I've got some bad news for you...
Echo chamber for leftist and misfit SJW types all who think they are special snowflakes.
Fuck them - they have always been wrong and since they are a one trick pony - will remain wrong.
Almost every fucking TV show like Colbert's shits all over Trump, and it's getting autistic
They'll change their position the moment IT won't work anymore no problem
How about other countrys interfear with russias domestic policys?
Oh wait your a dictator ship now.
Ameribros, how much popular this show?
the autism seems to be strong with you.
Praise kek.
Liberals come from a position of standing up to the big guy for the sake of the little guy. They'll always go after the president, even if he's a liberal.
Obama got off lightly because he had a fairly uneventful presidency but also of course, because he was black. The liberals are infested with their identity politics, if Hilary had won, she'd be able to do no wrong in their eyes too. Compare that to the amount of shit Bill got in his time.
What we need is a Republican candidate who is female or black. It'd make them BSoD as they try to come up with commentary.
Unless Putin domes dudes in a televised man-love orgy and allows the Russian economy to be taken over by foreign assets, he will always be a monster to liberals.
Corrupt as Putin might be, I respect him for not wavering national interests for world interests and being unshaped by the western demands for faggot rights.
The more they plunge their vocal knives into him, the more dull and useless do their words become.
>What do they gain from bashing the new President?
nothing
anti russia ideology was ingrained in the US institutions as a result of the cold war/war against communism
the USSR collapsed and there is no leadership and new ideology. this type of thing hasn't happened in the US yet but Trump might bring it about.
the media is in bed with democrats who are full of russophobes (much moreso than republicans at this point in time)
the democratic geolpolitical strategy is an anti-russia strategy. if russia is against the proliferation of homosexuality, the democrats are for it. if the russians are for imprisonment of drug users, the democrats are against it.
democrats and the media have to be anti-russia. why? they don't know anymore. it's just inertia at this point, but there's no real philosophical point to be against them anymore.
I used to think this guy was funny, now I just want to punch him in the face.
>new leadership* not no leadership
>Liberals come from a position of standing up to the big guy for the sake of the little guy. They'll always go after the president, even if he's a liberal.
You don't actually believe this, do you?
>How about other countrys interfear with russias domestic policys?
>Oh wait your a dictator ship now.
Exactly. And our analog of Secretary of State not so stupid to use public free mail services or Facebook to send confidential top secret government documents.
they need a common enemy, because otherwise their cause will collapse due to internal fragmentation
There was no anti-Russia feeling in the US from like, the wall falling to 2012.
Yeltsin was such a joke that nobody even thought of them as a villain anymore.
When Romney, the greatest cuck in the world's history, brought up Russia in the debates against Obama, he was laughed at. "What are you living in the 80s?"
What I'm saying is you're wrong. Russia is a scapegoat now, maybe based off past distaste for the Soviet Union, but it's not inertia. There's a point to it, a reason for it.
i loved watching him on the daily show when Bush was in office. it was funny
i couldn't wait to see how they'd rip apart obama as soon as he won the election
they didn't. I thought they were in general critical, but they aren't. they're far-left democrat shills.
of all things, their blatant hypocrisy of putting on the veneer of "news" while hiding behind the excuse "we're just comedians" did more than anything for me to take a look at the republicans as not so evil.
I don't think you realize how partisan our (((comedy))) has gotten.
They never go after any Democrats. It's just mock Republicans, all the time.
This election proved that it backfired and they don't know what the fuck to do about it, they're just doubling down.
It seems they'll never learn their lesson and the Democrats are doomed to become a boutique regional party.
that shit is illegal to smoke in the uk
i don't know what you've been watching, but all i've ever seen them do is brown nose obama.
most of these shows arent watched that much, if at all
cnn is only getting ratings becauae airports are paid to show it on their tvs
Less popular than David Letterman's term overall, I like to think it's because Colbert doesn't have the same charm, especially now that he's gone full libtard echo chamber, and the magnitude of guests is far less than what Davy had.
Like that's the worst of it, I've seen the same actors and democratic politicians on the Late Show to the point where it felt almost weekly, whereas David one minute had on Howard Stern, and the next minute ran fucking Hatsune Miku. Guy definitely had a grasp of audience range.
They don't actually even have anyone in particular to push it, they just give TV shows to useful idiots that actually believe this liberal horseshit.
>I don't think you realize how partisan our (((comedy))) has gotten.
Partisan? That doesn't even matter. It's about establishing and maintaining the proper mindset. Sometimes a bit more left, sometimes a bit more to the right.
Remember kids: Donald not only transcendences/outshines libs, he also BTFO reps.
His home state voted for trump
He is cucked
the author of this book:
en.wikipedia.org
is very entrenched in the democratic party, and his whole philosophy and approach is very anti-russia.
after the collapse of the USSR, larry sommers and the clinton admin put yeltsin in charge, and created the russian oligarchy to plunder russia and leave it a rump state.
when putin take charge, there were rumblings in the intelligence/FP community about what would happen in russia, but it was still largely perceived by the public as a rump state.
fear struck on 08/08/08 when russia smacked the georgians down. the media only started to build the case in the public perception that evil was going on in russia but that notion/perception still wasn't credible even in 2012 amongst the public so there was no point in pushing it.
the fact that biden brought it up shows you where the minds of the old democratic guard are. obama wasn't one of the old democrats.
an excellent docu worth watching:
youtube.com
Pretty much what this guy said. I remember watching the Daily Show back around 2002/2003 and at that time it at least kind of tried to pretend it was unbiased, but even then it was slanted pretty heavily left. Now they don't even pretend anymore, Colbert no longer does his "fake conservative" persona, and Samantha Bee has just been outright shilling for Clinton the whole time, she doesn't even tell any jokes. Or maybe she does and I just don't realize they're supposed to be jokes, that seems to happen a lot for me with female comedians.
>veneer of "news" while hiding behind the excuse "we're just comedians"
There were so many jokes to be made of the most corrupt candidate in US history and he never went close. This election cycle has showed that the mask of "comedy" has completely fallen, leafbro.
The (((agenda))) for the (((media))) is blam Trump with anything he says, real or not, good or not, and turning it into a bad thing.
(((Their masters))) require it.
>Jimmy Fallon tries as hard as possible to be centrist and poke fun at both sides
>juggernaut of the ratings wars compared to all these other shows.
Really Makes You THINK!
>What do they gain from bashing the new President?
It's the hip thing to do.
lets put it this way: When Dave Letterman was the host, he constantly competed with the Jay Leno's tonight show for the number 1 spot.
now that Colbert is the host, the show is struggling to compete for the number 2 spot, while Jimmy Fallon, the new host of the Tonight Show, sits comfortably in number 1.
Colbert has absolutely ruined what has been one of the titans of the late night slot since 1993
>Trump wants Putin to rule America
Is this really their tactic right now? Is this what they are going with? Just some retarded hypothesis based on the fact they complimented each other?
(((They))) are fucking desperate right now.
>Samantha Bee has just been outright shilling for Clinton the whole time
This is how bad Samantha Bee's shilling for Clinton was:
>Why the fuck are these type of shows so cucked?
Who nose?
>What do they gain from bashing the new President?
Getting you to watch it and share it.
There's a fuckton of money and fame in reassuring despondent liberals that they're all smart and superior while the rest of the world is racist and stupid.
Stewart pioneered it, and now a small army of "comedians" make a living off it.
>immediately blames white people for everything wrong after Trump wins
>looked ready to cry at any moment
I'm honestly curious how far these people can be pushed before they abandon ship.
Laughter in this case doesn't come from "comedy" or "jokes". Laughter is a communal action that signals and reinforces everyone's membership in the Smart, Intelligent, Moral People's club. To not laugh at the humorless propaganda is to out yourself as one of the stupid people being mocked.
As a method of indoctrination, it's infinitely more effective than sitting quietly while some blowhard rants for an hour.
Because being a Democrat is safe and perfectly socially acceptable. They don't want to rock the boat.
Migu won't stand for this shit.
Sup Forums stopped WW3, you don't need to listen to this cuck as long as you know that, though that background laughter (laugh track) irritates me dearly. Why did you invent it, America?
Wikileaks stated it wasn't Russians. So who do we believe?
>>what do they gain from bashing the new President
You,ll have to ask the Jews who write his jokes, why they want war with Russia And average normies to hate Russia for no reason.