Is there anyone better at triggering leftcucks than Ben "Our Guy" Shapiro?

Is there anyone better at triggering leftcucks than Ben "Our Guy" Shapiro?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=C8nf1ROko0s&t=0s
twitter.com/AnonBabble

fuck off ben, you made your bed.

he's breddy gud tbpf

Has he always worn a Jew hat? I noticed he's wearing one the last few times I've seen him.

Do a positive review for Culture of Critique and name some other Jews and we will consider giving you attention.

He's such a pantywaist though. And he plays the "OMG ANTI-SEMITISM" card a lot.

Come home Ben

ben "israel is our greatest ally" shapiro

>(((Shapiro)))

>Our guy

Ben "Stereotypical Badger" Shapiro

He's a Neocon, fuck him

>FACTS DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS
>quits Breitbart in a huff over a proven lie because muh feelings

A word so overused it has all the value of a Sup Forumstard saying nigger.

Ben quit Breitbart because it had become such a Trump organ that it would back the political narrative of a candidate over their one of their own reporters, and it was Lewandowski who lied in that incident to claim that he'd never touched her.

He unironically still thinks that the Iraq war was a good idea.

He thinks the way Obama went about throwing away the policy which resulted in a far worse situation. He's 100% correct in that. It's retarded beyond comprehension to claim the current situation in Iraq was the inevitable result of the original policy.

arguing that obama fucked up in leaving the way he did is reasonable. but shapiro also believes that Bush was correct in invading in 2003 which is retarded. The war was in no way worth it for USA or Iraq but it has helped the standing of Israel so he still supports it and probably wants the US to invade Iran next. That's why he wants Bolton as secretary of state.

Oh hi Ben, should i study law like you or should i join a different field ?

thread theme youtube.com/watch?v=C8nf1ROko0s&t=0s

On a tactical level for any but pure strain isolationists, the Iraq war debate at the time it was had and in the framework of the intelligence then known was a pretty solid case, given what the direction of our policy was with regard to Iraq going back more than a decade through both D and R administrations. Jonny come latelys with their revisionist history of the war's origins have nothing constructive to offer. As to the culture of interventionalism vs the typical American's tendency towards self-involvement, it was probably a strategic mistake.

Besides, who gives a fuck how Israel rates in how America should or should not conduct our foreign policy besides White Nationalists, anyway? If that's a criteria used in your argumentation, your argumentation is worthless.

The "intelligence then known" was fabricated bullshit that was just thrown together to be a justification to nation build over oil deposits. They said Saddam was involved in 9/11 and that he had WMDs, both complete nonsense. And there were plenty of anti-war protests before the invasion happened and people with an ounce of foresight pointing out how removing Saddam would be nice but the power vacuum he would leave behind would be dangerous and uncontrollable. It's really not complicated.

>Besides, who gives a fuck how Israel rates in how America should or should not conduct our foreign policy besides White Nationalists, anyway?

Ben Shapiro, which is why I brought it up.

Our guy my ass, he went along with flat out lies trying to prevent the god emperor from gaining the throne of mankind.

Ben "Jewish Robert DeNiro" Shapiro needs to take his greedy trump hating Yarmulke ass back to the synagogue.

>The "intelligence then known" was fabricated bullshit
And to think I'd preempt this with the word 'revisionist.'

The intelligence then known was the collective deduction of the whole world's intelligence agencies, for cause.

>They said Saddam was involved in 9/11
No they didn't. This was never a part of the debate other than what feverishly misinformed partisans were talking about.

>and that he had WMDs both complete nonsense.

And this goes to the 'cause' point above. There was a strong suspicion that Saddam still had WMD's by foreign intelligence agencies and (critically important point here) the people of the Iraqi street because that's what Saddam WANTED everyone to believe.

>And there were plenty of anti-war protests before the invasion happened and people with an ounce of foresight pointing out how removing Saddam would be nice but the power vacuum he would leave behind would be dangerous and uncontrollable. It's really not complicated.
You're just another Jonny come lately who has nothing worth while to contribute because you've been informed by those asinine anti-war narratives, when all those really were was a way of activating the base of the left in the same way the Democrats are activating the base of the left against Trump now through the protests.

Note that earlier you agreed that the today's quagmire was pretty much caused by the way Obama subsequently handled things. This need not have been the dangerous situation its turned out to be that 'people with ounce of foresight' claimed it when the way things are is the result of a long chain of decisions and happenings.

err he triggers everyone.

Wrong.

>The BBC has also noted that, while President Bush "never directly accused the former Iraqi leader of having a hand in the attacks on New York and Washington", he "repeatedly associated the two in keynote addresses delivered since 11 September", adding that "Senior members of his administration have similarly conflated the two." For instance, the BBC report quotes Colin Powell in February 2003, stating that "We've learned that Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases. And we know that after September 11, Saddam Hussein's regime gleefully celebrated the terrorist attacks on America." The same BBC report also noted the results of a recent opinion poll, which suggested that "70% of Americans believe the Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks."[79]

>Also in September 2003, the Boston Globe reported that "Vice President Dick Cheney, anxious to defend the White House foreign policy amid ongoing violence in Iraq, stunned intelligence analysts and even members of his own administration this week by failing to dismiss a widely discredited claim: that Saddam Hussein might have played a role in the 11 Sept. attacks."[80] A year later, presidential candidate John Kerry alleged that Cheney was continuing "to intentionally mislead the American public by drawing a link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 in an attempt to make the invasion of Iraq part of the global war on terror."[81]

The situation was completely fucked up before Obama took control, he deserves some blame but the vast majority lies at the feet of Bush, Cheney, and the (mostly) republicans in congress.


>...These criticisms were strengthened with the 2005 release of the so-called Downing Street Memo, written in July 2002, in which the former head of British Military Intelligence wrote that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" of removing Saddam Hussein from power.

i can go on and on

>A study coauthored by the Center for Public Integrity found that in the two years after September 11, 2001 the president and top administration officials had made 935 false statements, in an orchestrated public relations campaign to galvanize public opinion for the war, and that the press was largely complicit in its uncritical coverage of the reasons adduced for going to war.PBS commentator Bill Moyers had made similar points throughout the run up to the Iraq War, and prior to a national press conference on the Iraq War Moyers correctly predicted "at least a dozen times during this press conference he [the President] will invoke 9/11 and Al-Qaeda to justify a preemptive attack on a country that has not attacked America. But the White House press corps will ask no hard questions tonight about those claims." Moyers later also denounced the complicity of the press in the administration's campaign for the war, saying that the media "surrendered its independence and skepticism to join with [the U.S.] government in marching to war," and that the administration "needed a compliant press, to pass on their propaganda as news and cheer them on."

>An independent assessment by the Annenberg Public Policy Center found that Bush Administration officials did misuse intelligence in their public communications. For example, Vice President Dick Cheney's September 2002 statement on Meet the Press that "we do know, with absolute certainty, that he (Saddam) is using his procurement system to acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon," was inconsistent with the views of the intelligence community at the time.

>i can go on and on
Yes you could, each time drawing conclusions from things as you are wont to do with those revisionist lenses.

Was the serious national debate had in lofty (ill attended conference rooms on C-span, or between print organs of the different sides) or low (24 news networks) forums, even between any average American of clear thinking, centered around the issues of day as known by those participating in the debate? Yes, it was.

Did the administration give out some red herring arguments for the low information schubs to squabble over, either swallowing whole or overreacting to in a damaging way, which is the way politics is done? Sure. Everyone does that.

Ben is great, but of course his Jewishness and Zionism is a bit of a minus.

Milo probably triggers them more, but he's definitely top tier in that regard.

Fuck off Shapiro is a NeverTrump cuck who Whiteknighted himself out of Breitbart for that lying whore Michelle Fields.

The guy could have been part of something big but chose to make a damn fool of himself instead.

When will Ben come on home? He slays liberals like the crafty Jew he is, but for whatever reason Trump causes him to sperg out.

Come on home Ben, we have dinner waiting

Ben's not that great. I've kind of had enough of his smarmy attitude.

He's ourguy but he has to fight us because he knows he doesn't have a place in our perfect vision

Zyklon Ben. He don't just trigger them, he chops off their fucking heads.

>You shouldn't tax people unless you're willing to kill them
Autism

>>...These criticisms were strengthened with the 2005 release of the so-called Downing Street Memo, written in July 2002, in which the former head of British Military Intelligence wrote that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" of removing Saddam Hussein from power.
Same here.

It was already spoken to that it was the direction of America's policy across administrations of both parties to treat Saddam Hussein as a clear and present danger, with the habit to view acts or statements of his in a certain way and frame of mind. It is in this frame of mind that intelligence is gone over with conclusions drawn from them.

In histories that try to get at the truth of the matter, these are called mistakes, perhaps even mistakes of a gross nature, not plots.

This too,
>>A study coauthored by the Center for Public Integrity
which holds every misstatement by an administration official, tagged, labeled, and put all in one column proving intent, without consideration of the foibles of human nature of men to not be concise in all that they have to say, especially in a live environment as today's mass communications goes.

Which doesn't invalidate this passage:
>PBS commentator Bill Moyers had made similar points throughout the run up to the Iraq War . . . Moyers later also denounced the complicity of the press in the administration's campaign for the war, saying that the media "surrendered its independence and skepticism to join with [the U.S.] government in marching to war,"
Yeah, we were going to war, and yeah, the press was not all that interested in putting the national debate front and center and at to its philosophical merits.

It is this way because:
>but the vast majority lies at the feet of Bush, Cheney, and the (mostly) republicans in congress.
is complete horseshit. Everybody from both parties was of the same proximate mindset.

He's smart and a good debater.

But also a kike fag.

get out benji

Sage and hide the same damn thread reposted every four hours, especially when it is dishonest and uses proprietary CTR terminology.

He's good at the bants but aligned on the #wrongteam for 2 years straight

He ridiculed the left but never made peace with the alt-right like some kind of political hipster

He is going down hill. His show is falling apart ever since his less than keen political analysis.

holy shit it really is Little Benji

>holy shit its the truth

You mean Mister Never-Trump himself? (((Shapiro))) is a zionist America hater.

>and it was Lewandowski who lied in that incident to claim that he'd never touched her.

Is this a joke? She tried to claim Corey pulled her violently to the ground when all he did was walk by her hardly touching the lying cunt

>>holy shit its the truth

Holy shit it's the little kike manlet himself, you aren't fooling anyone here you parasite. Why do you think the case was dropped once video footage was found and it was literally nothing.

They were fired for being dishonest lying cunts, that's the truth. Ben is a subversive Jew who is not to be trusted, he belongs in an oven.

He's not our guy. He's a manlet cuck who lied about 'ebil Trump assaulted ma wymmin'. He chose his side and his side lost. #BoycottLittleBen

If this jew names the jews (Frankfurt school,...) as responsible for the progressive agenda, then he might get a job as oven cleaner.

But all these jews do, is making fun of brainwashed jew victims, never naming the ones responsible...

...