Also dear God this board is fast now. It might as well be Sup Forums.
Robert Torres
Aren't monarchists neoreactionaries anyways? Why are they even separate?
Charles Davis
This is fucking stupid.
Jeremiah Rogers
>fails to construct an argument, retreats to ad hominem, betrays his lack of creativity by using a cuss word You're stupid.
Brody Carter
>Also dear God this board is fast now
It's been fast, you idiot.
Noah Murphy
Reply to my post
David Scott
>Low IQ: Alt-right >High IQ: NRx That isn't how it works dude. The Alt-right is the active political segment of NRx instead of debating broad theoretical situations which will never happen.
Evan Scott
Why you no like Vox
Benjamin Ross
Assertions without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
Jose Hughes
>Alt Righter >Sup Forums
Kill yourself heeb.
Adam Perry
youre retarded. you have to go back. you also have to stop your jenkem abuse
Matthew Fisher
You forgot >God Tier >pic related
Thomas Carter
Elder God IQ: Egoist
Gavin Bailey
>political affiliations I like are smart >ones I dislike are dumb >this is evidenced by absolutely nothing
Nice slide thread. What was so important you felt it needed to be pushed off?
Jayden Torres
SSC is not an NRxer
Adam Sanchez
Fuck off Curtis
Aaron Ross
>Neoreactionary What's this? The descriptions i found are vague
He is going to turn insane or go full nrx in a few years.
Camden Miller
Basically people who hate democracy and populism. They endorse a wide variety of systems of government to replace democracy with.
Benjamin Gutierrez
>Libertarians >high IQ
Hunter Price
>taking iq seriously
this is where you fail faggot
Adrian Collins
>that guy he's not a true libertarian. clearly a trump or clinton plant
Daniel Parker
>Genius IQ >Monarchist stopped reading there
Oliver James
>Neo-reactionary and monarchist in the genius category.
I strongly support this list
Wyatt Ward
>Look, an opinion I disagree with >Maybe someone with such a high IQ as myself should explain why it's wrong >Nah, I'm just too smart and know I'm right, no need to waste time convincing the common people of my genius
Mason Clark
>"The opposite of credentialism is meritocracy – the belief that the best person should get the job whether or not they’ve given $200,000 to Yale. In my crazy conspiracy theory, social justice is the attack arm of the educated/urban/sophisticated/academic Blue Tribe, which works by constantly insisting all competing tribes are racist and sexist and therefore need to be dismantled/taken over/put under Blue Tribe supervision for their own good. So we get told that meritocracy is racist and sexist. Colleges have pronounced talking about meritocracy to be a microaggression, and the media has declared that supporting meritocracy is inherently racist. Likewise, we are all told that standardized tests and especially IQ are racist and hurt minorities, even though in reality this testing helps advance minorities better than the current system. For the same reason, colleges are moving away from the SATs (an actual measure of student intelligence), to how well students do in interviews, how well they write essays, and other things which are obvious proxies for social class and tribal affiliation."
Carson Phillips
Libertarianism is inherently hypocritical.
"Taxation is theft! Unless it's something I like, like the military."
Theft is always immoral, along with all the other forms of force initiation. At least monarchists and natsocs are honest about their "end justifies the means" goal; libertarians pursue the same thing while falsely claiming the moral high ground.
Adam Morgan
Then, in the exact same commentpost:
>I am pretty darned Blue Tribe myself – I’m pro-choice, pro-fighting-climate-change, pro-gay, pro-transgender, non-religious, pro-higher-taxes-on-rich, pro-single-payer, anti-gun, ready-for-Hillary, etc – and after having watched the Republican debate tonight I can honestly say I’m terrified at anyone other than the Blue Tribe having power. But just as I can be proud of my Jewish heritage but also upset about the occupation of Palestine, so I can be proud of the Blue Tribe and not too happy about their project of crushing everybody else with an iron fist regardless of the collateral damage. Doing anything about this is a dauntingly large project, but my own comparative advantage is in picking apart some of the sillier studies they use to put a fig-leaf over what they’re doing."
actually it feels like at least 10% Sup Forums nowadays are neo-reactionaries. I agree with the first one, but the list itself is shitty and alt-righters is not a thing, just a fucking meme
Connor James
this
Kevin Nguyen
>Libertarian in 'high', not 'genius' Apparently you haven't heard about the fact that the vast majority of the Tripple Nine Society and Mensa members are libertarians
Nicholas Evans
Transhuman superintelligence AI god IQ: right- accelerationist
Nicholas Taylor
Retard IQ: Posting a jpeg that shitty
Gavin Morris
hey suka, you have neo-reactionaries at the top. those are libertarians with a brain
John Adams
Where does classical liberalism fall?
Ethan Brooks
145 IQ here. Why is anybody talking about feudalism? I also want to take back some rightful clay of my family.
Evan Martinez
>slatestarcodex stopped reading right there, this is the most bluepilled motherfucker in existence, he's literally propaganda for bluepills
If you want something good in that vein, try reading the archives of thelastpsychiatrist. slatestarcodex belongs on the fucking trash heap.
it greatly amuses me with americans suck off monarchies when I live in one and we're still getting flooded by brownies
David Rivera
We mean real monarchies, not a gagglefuck for tourists.
Cameron Perry
>liberals >high iq
>conservatives >high iq
>independents >high iq
Michael Ross
TUUNA
Jordan Green
im somewhere significantly above genius
John James
You've been an American satellite colony since post-World War II, arguably before that even.
He's brushed fingers with neoreactionary thought, sees how it's correct in the abstract, then violently gets torn back to the reality of being Brahmin incarnate.
no, libertarianism is about everything being privatised, even military & bureaucracy of govt
Liam Sullivan
>tfw passivist >tfw too intelligent to care about politics >tfw I only come to this board to laugh at stupid people making futile arguments
Joseph Perry
See
Hunter Howard
thats a circle, sir
Kevin Lewis
>His latest article has been soul-scorching for normies It isn't. If you're reading it, it's for you.
His language is very careful: >That it came to dominate the election cycle should be considered a horrifying indictment of our political discourse... "Our" political discourse? You mean... "we at slatestarcodex"? Oh, he doesn't... hmm...
He's as editorialized as NPR. Tread very carefully, user. I don't really mean he isn't worth reading, I speak with hyperbole. Just tread carefully.
Michael Garcia
Angry black studies or sociology professor detected
Michael Clark
also, see:
Jaxon Scott
more blogs and hopefully podcasts too please desu senpai
Eli Price
UK is a parliamentary democracy. Absolute monarchy could hardly be more different
Colton Phillips
>Anarcho-Communist (Chomsky) please explain to me why Chomsky is retarded, you see I have some friends that think he is the smartest man ever
Lucas Nguyen
>low iq Alt Righter
>Genius IQ: Neoreactionary
Alt right and nrx mean the same thing you dipshit.
Adam Baker
> Vox > Alt right
Wtf?
Also Salon should be much lower. Even Chomsky is better than any of the garbage on that site... well, that's debatable.
Mainstream Republican can be dumb, but it isn't the worst anymore at least.
An-caps are good at everything except for defending their own ideology, so I guess you're right there.
Nathaniel Parker
Anyone with a high enough IQ is going to appear 'autistic' to you sub-median normies.
Good list user. Though I think you need to be genius to read Thomas Carlyle properly.
vox day should be higher up.
steve sailer deserves a mention next to vox day maybe on high or average iq.
radish mag could be on high iq
slatestarcodex is great but not genius iq.
put slatestarcodex in with Matt Ridley
Put blog.jim.com in average (great read btw).
LessWrong should go into cuck/smart.
Really what you need is a graph with an IQ axis and a cuck axis. i might make on tomorrow.
Levi Thomas
t. AnCom
Jackson Collins
>neoreactionaries >alt-righters >eerily overlapping philosophies >one is god tier the other is low IQ
Same with fascism and alt-right
OP maybe you should kill yourself
Adrian James
>genius >blogs Stopped reading right there.
t. 144 IQ center-right liberal (not the same as a Democrat/"modern liberal")
Charles Green
How is NRx good?
Go back to shitty pre-Enlightenment days sacrificing freedom of speech, rationalism, equality and a better economic system so that we can get rid of transgenders and put women back on line? I don't like everything about where Western civilization is going, but those days seem like shit, especially for the poor. Democracy is kind of retarded and monarchy has its upsides, but I don't think that's our biggest issue. With monarchy, many shit traditions stay and freedom is suppressed more so than it is in republics.
I like some things about those days too, but I'd rather live in this time period than before.
Evan Martinez
Most based political "position" here. Has the ideals of a liberal (freedom, equality, etc) and sees these somewhat in the right (guns, equal opportunity, etc, free speech).
Camden Wright
I would put Alasdair Macintyre under Genius. After Virtue was hard to digest. Macintyre could be considered neoreactionary too since he exposes and rejects post-enlightenment metaphysics.
Dominic Russell
>salon and Sup Forums on same IQ tier
I agree NRX is up there but for this you should seriously just KYS
Charles Foster
Vox and the Economist are far left sites pushing cultural marxism
Jackson Morris
Except liberalism isn't about equality (at least not in the economical way). Also, the gun thing is way overrated.
Michael King
Tfw passivist
David Nelson
>genius iq >monarchist
a true genius knows so much to understand he is a flawed human and even if he flawless in his reign, his next of kin might not be.
True genius IQ is passivist.
Joshua Collins
That's not what they're advocating.
Owen Butler
>lul
fucking brainlet
Bentley Russell
>Neoreactionary >What's this? The descriptions i found are vague
Followers of Mencius Moldbug.
Christian Gray
>monarchist >doesn't explain which type of monarchism
fucking retard
Adrian Bennett
>slatestarcodex Into the trash it goes
Dominic Murphy
I'm glad you linked this post, it horrified me the first time I read it when SSC slowly pieces together how completely psychopathic and evil his own side is and then deletes the comment out of shame.
Robert Davis
>Christian Anarchist (Papal Encyclicals)
What. Ever read an encyclical before, OP?
Parker Wood
You've never read Moldbug. Go do that before you post about NRx.
Carter Robinson
What is your definition of liberalism? I get different answers all the time.
Bentley Lewis
It means the type of monarchy that Continental Europe had.
Jeremiah Adams
Sure, I've only read one or two NRx blog entries before so I'll do some more research.
Levi Stewart
Moldbug is needlessly long-winded
Leo Watson
Wikipedia can explain it to you better than anyone else on here.
Zachary Brown
I'm a monarchist. Only way this works
Ethan Evans
>fails to construct an argument, retreats to ad hominem
is all the OP is
Dylan Watson
Moldbug is too recent. I have a bias towards ideas that have survived for a long time. Besides, I think strands of Moldbug's critiques can be found in De Maistre and Okeshott.
Jeremiah Perez
The fundamental problem with democracy is that politicians with term limits who need popular support have the time preference of a goldfish. Almost all democracies preform Keynsian parlor tricks to blow up a hollow economy and rack up debt until they run into a national crises. In an internet age this process will only get faster. Further, democracy devolves into theft and the elimination of feedback loops. Dysfunction is subsidized, and therefore it spreads.
The goal of Nrx is not to eliminate freedom of speech, it's to ensure that the will of the people doesn't affect governance. When citizenry's opinions are unrelated to power structures, nobody benefits politically from telling people what to think. Western democracies pass hate speech laws and decay into soft totalitarian societies for this reason. Anybody peddling the truth (journalists, academics) becomes a political actor, and power is tempting.
Rationalism isn't necessarily at risk in neoreactionary societies (although there are certainly religious neoreactionaries who want religious feudalism). Rationalism is at risk in modern society, where a political culture is trying to influence your thoughts. Think of the average social scientists' response to Trump's election; it is obvious they are not impartial observers. Sociologists are not studying society, they are directing it.
>equality Not upheld in current system, and a fairly empty concept.
>better economic system Our economic system isn't better than it was two centuries ago.
Nathan Wood
He's incredibly good, but I don't think it's correct to call him a neoreactionary. Neoreaction, as the term is generally used, has too many other facets and connotations he would probably reject.
Joshua Perry
pls do
Juan Scott
100% accurate
Camden King
>Sup Forums >alt-right Back to pleddit you go.
Leo Thomas
>no primitivist eco-fascist in genius tier
Lincoln Thompson
It concerns me how much neoreactionaries flirt with Sup Forums. Nick Land has been polposting hard on his twitter and Moldbug did a recent AMA where he mentioned weev.
