Why did he do it /pol? Was he right ?

Why did he do it /pol? Was he right ?

Other urls found in this thread:

ahrp.org/1959-1962-harvard-and-the-making-of-the-unabomber/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

yup. oldfags know him well.

Because they paved a highway all the way up to the wilderness refuge he had taken to escape civilization.

From that moment he concluded there was no alternate method for escaping industrial civilization besides it's total destruction.

Shills are starting to leak back out of A5 and pizza threads. One-posting is not a legitimate format. Neither is "addressing" pol.

u wut m8

But his autism prevented him from understanding that civilization must run it's course. He thought he could top it by becoming a martyr but no one gave a shit.

>Because they paved a highway all the way up to the wilderness refuge he had taken to escape civilization.
did this literally happen ?

Greatest modern American philosopher.

Correct in his description of leftists and their motivations.

I'm more optimistic about the future of industrialized society but his outlook really tickles your almonds.

Feel very bad for him, he was mentally ill for sure, but he understood the leftist psyche and described it incredibly well. Massive red pill.

>He thought he could top it by becoming a martyr but no one gave a shit.
the Jesus complex

When I first read his manifest I was btfo

How can you be optimistic? It will be the current state of social relations and economic complexity x10000.

I certainly agree that it won't be stopped without a complete collapse but I sure as Hell refuse to believe that it will be good in any way.

Video games and sci-fi novels are not accurate predictions.

The last great man born until now. A hero and a messiah.

He was basically completely right. He might have redpilled me.

but why did he choose to kill innocent people tho

I've considered writing him a letter

he was normie as fuck until he got redpilled

MKULTRA

More or less

He didn't.

He said he killed people for vengeance.

mentally ill and no.
his mom used to send him money when he lived in the woods. sad.

the only problem with this is that you will get your name in a watchlist

I don't think he was mentally ill, but he was probably a victim of MKULTRA or similar project. Look into his time as an undergraduate at Harvard. Kaczynski was an incredibly intelligent guy, but Murray's experiments may have fucked him up.

I reckon he would have been OK if he had an outlet like Sup Forums and Sup Forums back in his day.

A warning to all the SJW's.

YOU SHUT DOWN Sup Forums

YOU WILL END UP WITH A BUNCH OF KACZYNSKIS

They weren't innocent. They were merchants of industrialization.

He is not mentally ill, he is a paranoid

He was right about leftists, half-right about technology, and wrong about blowing up mailboxes.

I recall his manifesto directly saying that he decided to bomb people to get attention for his manifesto and his anti-industrial message.

Redpill me on mkultra, why do you think think it's real and why do you think it's bad?

...

its a fact people blew stuff up before we invented shitposting

Sup Forums literally contributes to world peace

Yes it literally he happened. He also literally cited it as the event that,convinced him to start bombing.
Lol he never intended to be caught.

Right about a lot of things, but like our Lord and Saviour Adolf, took it a bit too far

He did it to get his manifesto to the public. He wanted to warn everyone in a way that made people pay attention. He saw a lot of shit we only dream of in our wildest conspiracy theories. It fucked his head pretty hard and he probably saw things he never wrote down as well, considering what we know about pizzagate, who knows what kind of fucked up shit was going on with the cia back then?

>considering what we know about pizzagate,
We are yet to see any conclusive info from this tho
>who knows what kind of fucked up shit was going on with the cia back then?
I wonder how much they edited from his original manifesto and other writings he potentially had

blue pill muh global warming tard.

He took so many red pills he went insane.

>Why did he do it /pol?
A frustrated genius mentally damaged by a government experiment he participated in during his college years.
I believe that had it not been for the psychological trauma he endured that he probably could have been an accomplished author and cultural icon fighting against the decline of the west.

>Was he right ?
I believe he hit the nail on the head in his cultural critiques. He quite accurately summed up what would happen in coming years, and its all come to pass. Though I suppose when you see yourself on a track you'd be inclined to spend some time thinking about your coming destination.
I disagree with him on the point of technology essentially crippling and destroying us. I can see why it would be an easy target to focus on, but I don't think his scope was broad enough. I'd argue that the radio isn't bad, but what plays on it, and if you question whats playing you have to look into whose making it.

His criminal acts became the focus of his life. Its a damn shame too.
Violent acts like the ones he carried out are short sighted, ultimately pointless. Its an act of frustration which accomplishes nothing.
Killing a few inconsequential people does not effect widespread political change. He spent so much time fixating on minor wrong doings of certain people that he began to see all faults of society embodied in them personally, as if they were an effigy of responsibility for the decline of the country.

There is a lesson to be learned here apart from his critiques on modern culture, and its that assassinations are a tool that only work when employed by the government themselves. Lashing out in frustration at the world is an impotent act.
I sympathize with and respect Ted a lot. I wish he had made different decisions in life. I wish he never went through what he did.

They def had an impact. Without acid i doubt he ever would've gone full bomb rage.

He still IS right

Did the experiments he was in go farther than giving him acid and observing the result's?

IIRC he was essentially a loner his entire life and then when he got to college he got into some program where they literally tortured him. Something something feds/military stuff. Then he started bombing.

Wasn't he supposed to be a genius?

bait

He was basically told to write an essay detailing all his personal beliefs, everything he loved, and thought to be true.
He was locked in a little room, a man read his essay, then screamed at him for hours, detailing why everything he believed in was a lie. He wasn't allowed to leave the room until he had a crying break down.
Essentially mental torture funded by tax payer money.

But he's not. If we abandon our industrial society then a neighboring industrial society will conquer us because we would lose the ability to fight back.

Anarcho-primitivism is identical to communism in that it can only work if every society on earth adopts it at the same time, which cannot happen.

Agreed. After I read about the experiments they ran on him in college I couldn't believe it. The man is a living embodiment of wasted brilliance

good post

> 96. As for our constitutional rights, consider for example that of
> freedom of the press. We certainly don't mean to knock that right: it
> is very important tool for limiting concentration of political power
> and for keeping those who do have political power in line by publicly
> exposing any misbehavior on their part. But freedom of the press is of
> very little use to the average citizen as an individual. The mass
> media are mostly under the control of large organizations that are
> integrated into the system. Anyone who has a little money can have
> something printed, or can distribute it on the Internet or in some
> such way, but what he has to say will be swamped by the vast volume of
> material put out by the media, hence it will have no practical effect.
> To make an impression on society with words is therefore almost
> impossible for most individuals and small groups. Take us (FC) for
> example. If we had never done anything violent and had submitted the
> present writings to a publisher, they probably would not have been
> accepted. If they had been accepted and published, they probably would
> not have attracted many readers, because it's more fun to watch the
> entertainment put out by the media than to read a sober essay. Even if
> these writings had had many readers, most of these readers would soon
> have forgotten what they had read as their minds were flooded by the
> mass of material to which the media expose them. In order to get our
> message before the public with some chance of making a lasting
> impression, we've had to kill people.

I like how eloquent you are user, you should give your opinion more often.

When I read his manifesto I was in... I can say, awe. The way he brilliantly make a summary of how the left ideology would ultimately bring about the ultimate crisis, and how he is able to understand the issues with technology, I wish I was smart enough to continue what he started

Wow no wonder his manifesto was so long winded.

everybody here should read his short story, "Ship of Fools". great stuff and very appropriate for the modern age.

A complete retard who mistakenly thought he could make a positive change by being a terrorist.

If you actually read his book, you'd see that it's essentially a compilation of what sociologists and philosophers from his time and before his time have been saying already, except written by a relative layman, it's like something a /r9k/ poster would write.

Of course it's mostly correct, but so are the works of Neil Postman for example, who says pretty much the exact same shit, but wasn't crazy enough to kill people over it.

Holy kek checked

I like you

you have to go back to lebbit

Don't make me go, it's scary there, they always downvote my posts and call me names

More detailed version for those curious
ahrp.org/1959-1962-harvard-and-the-making-of-the-unabomber/
>The undergraduates were asked to write an autobiographical essay describing their most personal beliefs and aspirations, as well as their deepest sexual desires. They were taken individually to an interrogation room with a one-way mirror where they were strapped to a chair with electrodes attached to monitor their physiological responses. Each student was subjected to lengthy, abusive harangues by a law school student who had been given a detailed psychological battle plan by Murray. The students were deceived, ridiculed, and humiliated. In essence, students were put through a brutal “version of the third degree”, otherwise known as torture. Over the next three years, the volunteers were repeatedly humiliated, verbally assaulted and sexually debased. The entire proceeding was filmed from behind a one-way mirror, and each victim was required to relive his humiliation on film.

From what I've read, he had the worst response of any participant.

Also forgot to mention that temporarily blinding lights were before interrogation.

Ted's writings from inside the supermax are interesting as well.

...

...

...

...

...

This is a quite interesting read. The bit of humor injected there is something of a surprise as well.

The letter he wrote to his brother(who ratted him out) on the other hand is full of seething rage.

...

...

>autistic mathematician
>virgin despite not being bad-looking
>normie
Try again.

RETURN THE SPIRIT OF THE BRONZE AGE
DESTRUCTION OF THE CITIES IN FIRE!

tldr?

psychology doesn't real

kek