>Civil cases aren't criminal
He's still liable for the fraud, and fraud is a crime
Clinton was never charged, yet, when Trump has to settle - he isn't a criminal? Dumbass
> that's what settlement means faggot. They pay the other person to fuck off.
No, it means he couldn't win the case, and had to settle because if he proceed - he would have lost
By the way, Trump also said he would never settle, retard. He's a loser, just like you
>Deficit spending /= Keynesian
Where did you get your economic degree? Devry fucking University? That's literally the fucking definition of Keynesian economics
Also, and this will get some hate, the broken window fallacy isn't a fallacy under the right conditions. If when the economy is down and money is cheap you break a bunch of windows and fix them, in the long run you very well could be better off.
one was civil, the other was actual case
pretty sure he's got better things to do now
I hope you get sued, it would be so easy to clean out your retarded ass.
>pretty sure he's got better things to do now
Like ruin the fucking country
>Hitlers economic policy
it wasn't Hitlers tho
A reputable organization. And no, that isn't the definition of Keynesianism. You are misinformed. You literally only run deficits when both aggregate demand is low and interest rates are as low as possible.
Unlike Trump, I'll never get sued because I'm actually a law-abiding citizen that doesn't commit adultery or avoid taxes
Welfare and progressive taxation are kind of like automatic Keynesianism and the reason we have a much more stable business cycle since their introduction. They push the budget counter-cyclically regardless of which idiots we voted in last election. That said, we would be better off if our governments would use discretionary fiscal expansion (deliberately running deficits) exactly as much as needed - difficult, but it can be done.
What we really need is this:
en.wikipedia.org
>Fiscal policy should be directed in light of its impact on the economy, and the budget should be managed accordingly, that is, 'balancing revenue and spending' is not important; prosperity is important.
>The amount and pace of government spending should be set in light of the desired level of activity, and taxes should be levied for their economic impact, rather than to raise revenue.
>Principles of 'sound finance' apply to individuals. They make sense for individuals, households, businesses, and non-sovereign governments (such as cities and individual US states) but do not apply to the governments of sovereign states, capable of issuing money.