Banning Porn

Is porn really causing a public health crisis?

Should it be banned?

Would a porn ban be effective (like the current laws on child porn) or would it just result in a situation like the War on Drugs?

Haha yea. Censoring the internet is a great idea

Yep. Porn is the gateway drug for SJW anything-goes liberalism.

Keep a kid's mind porn free and they will form good moral values.

Concerned about your cuck porn supply, Sven?

porn needs to be banned

source: can't stop porn

i don't buy porn, ive never bought porn, but unlimited porn at any time that is literally easier to acquire than food from the fridge.

Would an outright ban be necessary on anything ranging from internet stuff to Playboy, or just an enforcement of obscenity laws (like Trump promises)?

All porn or just some of the stuff on the internet? Would you differentiate between like Hustler/Pornhub and Playboy?

I don't even watch porn. Aside from what i see on pol and int

Rape cases would be at an all-time high if you ban porn.

70% of the internet is porn
good look weeding this out

Ban on traditional marriage creates demand for porn. Banning porn before banning feminism is a foul move.

Also calling marriage with a spinsters "traditional" is equally degenerate to endorsing feminism.

More like "pedophilia" cases, when young women and young men would instinctively look for partners for life.

Definitely ban the extreme stuff.

Outright ban all tranny porn, that sends kids over the edge to being trannies.

Other than that, maybe just keeping kids off the internet unsupervised is enough. Parents should take responsibility for their kids.

Here's a suggestion: anyone on welfare should have their ISP ban them from accessing porn sites.

Widespread porn use was pushed as a psy-op by the ones generally behind all psy-ops. They're addicted young men to the overstimulation of their dopamine production, rendered them uninterested in seeking out real women (who can't measure up physically to the top .5% of females who make porn that gets passed around), and chained them to the computer. The effects on young girls are just as bad, but not talked about as much. Young girls are now turning themselves into porn as young as 14 because the boys expect it. The girls have been put in an arms race against each other. If she doesn't send nudes, some other girl will, and the girl with less moral fiber will get the attention. The girls are told that this is a healthy way of expressing their "sexuality" and that being a porn star is a feminist path to empowerment by people like Sasha Grey and Lena Dunham.

And you faggots will keep making excuses about why it's ok, why it's about freedom of expression, why you're happier to have limitless porn at your fingertips 24/7.

It should be harder for porn to be accessible on the internet to minors. This is the only logical stance to take. Banning things outright is retarded.

sorry 1st amendment trumps your censorship horseshit

Why not just increase police presence and penalties for rape?

70% of your country is white and your government is still trying to stamp those out :^)

Porn demeans women and increases rape

Ban it

First Amendment doesn't cover screaming "Fire" in a crowded theater. Shouldn't cover things that cause public health crises (see: and ).

>Porn demeans women

subjective

>and increases rape

subjective
also, you presuppose those are both bad events

Maybe tasteful nude spreads with good photography in a magazine. The whole industry would have to be managed by the government because the jews in porn are too corrupt and too far reaching.

Not hardcore.

If it didn't work a full on ban of all porn would have to go into effect.

>First Amendment doesn't cover screaming "Fire" in a crowded theater.

strawman:
assault/battery and reckless endangerment by proxy by fraud

>Shouldn't cover things that cause

subjective

>public health crises

subjective

You could censor porn without the government even being involved. If all major ISPs stopped carrying it and private groups ran propaganda campaigns on the dangers of making and consuming porn, that'd probably cut out 99% of it. First Amendment only applies to the government.

>increases rape
Doubt it. If anything it pacifies men.

who defines extreme?

imbecile.

disagree
and even if it isnt ok, its none of your business
everything can be banned in the name of some "common good" and appeal to emotion

which is why there are protections against such censorship

I think porn is massively damaging to society and should be banned. First of all most porn features white women and this makes us look bad in the eyes of other races, it makes us think of all women as whores and therefore they end up acting more whorish due to our expectations. It stops young men from being forced into interactions with women and causes general demoralisation especially with interracial porn.

I came to this realization myself today. The porn-crazed young men that jerk it 9 times a day are docile and W.E.A.K. That's why our world is ruled by women and nu-males these days.

As men, it's our job to protect the morals of the women. That's been the system for thousands of years. Pretending that women have the capability to consider the consequences of porn is hilarious. All they see is instant gratification in the form of attention. They can't see far enough into the future to realize that they might not want to deal with the repercussions of sending a bunch of guys nudes or doing porn or starting a camshow.

Men have known since forever that women must be looked after much like children. Right now, these women (especially the 18-25 crowd which does most of the porn) have no man to take care of them. They have no fathers or husbands.

>You could censor porn without the government even being involved.

and?

> If all major ISPs stopped carrying it and private groups ran propaganda campaigns on the dangers of making and consuming porn, that'd probably cut out 99% of it.

so?
yet, still cannot be any of your business

>First Amendment only applies to the government.

that is and empty ideal of "free speech" & has only the virtue of being the status quo, nothing more

The government.

It's literally their job.

Just ban the production and disemenation of porn, and educate children about the dangers of porn by showing them NEET porn addicts

Not true! SJW target porn. I am straight white trump supporter, married, with a child, making 100k + a year and I view porn on the internet. It enhances our marriage

>it's our job to protect the morals of the women.

subjective
also fallacy of many questions:
presuppose harm in what you oppose here


>That's been the system for thousands of years.

appeal to tradition
et al

>Pretending that women have the capability to consider the consequences of porn is hilarious.

immaterial

>All they see is instant gratification in the form of attention.

who?
also subjective

>They can't see far enough into the future to realize that they might not want to deal with the repercussions of sending a bunch of guys nudes or doing porn or starting a camshow.


again:
*FOMQ
*subjective

>Men have known since forever that women must be looked after much like children.

appeal to tradition
subjective
ad hom

>Right now, these women (especially the 18-25 crowd which does most of the porn)

irrelevant
appeal to emotion

>have no man to take care of them. They have no fathers or husbands.

FOMQ
irrelevant
appeal to emotion

>the govt

yes, humans
which makes the definition subjective
youre not following very well

So from all this high school debate level "subjective" garbage you're putting up, I'm going to guess you're too young to be here.

>i have no idea what subjective means

diversion
ad hom
cop out
et al

yeah ok bud

Yes it should be banned.
Women are dumb and they can't have the freedom to do porn.
Look at this beauty, she does porn instead of marrying young and having a family.

>Yes it should be banned.

see:
>Look at this beauty, she does porn instead of marrying young and having a family.

none of your business

impossible for it to be any of your business

fuck you and fuck your liberty

yeah ok

i forgot:
*shooting the messenger

>Is porn really causing a public health crisis?
No
>Should it be banned?
No
>Would a porn ban be effective (like the current laws on child porn) or would it just result in a situation like the War on Drugs?
It would just result in a situation like the War on Drugs.

come to think of it.... indeed if they want to see rape skyrocket, a true and real rape-culture, definitely ban porn

leave it to americans to defend degeneracy
the perfect goys really

I am addicted to porn. I would like it banned.

Fuck my life.

>indeed if they want to see rape skyrocket, a true and real rape-culture, definitely ban porn
Or just go through with Hillarys plans and import more muslims :^)
>MUH DEGENERACY
Nice non-argument

>degeneracy

subective

did you conveniently ignore my post so you could arbitrarily prove your "point"? pathetic Spain.

>Sup Forums doesn't have a gf
>Sup Forums wants to ban porn
How will you satisfy your sexual urges then, huh?
>inb4 muh imagination

if you don't believe porn is causing a health and social crisis among the youth you are fucking retarded

but of course we can't expect americans to go against the freedom of the jews in san fernando valley to corrupt the whole western youth
what did I expect?

I can't wait until you're old enough to realize how cringey you're being right now. This isn't a high school debate. This is called "conversation." Do you talk like that IRL?

It is banned in South Korea but still available but they don't have a rape crisis. Porn is good money over there though so there is a lot of creepers.

CTR pls go

It's a Jewish tool to pacify us.

honestly i don't want them satisfied. I would like to become a lich and not feel the need to have sex

and instead raise a skeleton army

Rape.

in during imagination

Men were jerking off for thousands of years before porn. Porn and masturbation are not synonymous.

The way to do it is the way the UK government did it.
Bring in a load of laws regulating the production in the country, just to kill the industry.
Then down the line tighten up what videos can be played in the country, regardless of where they were produced.

Then just ban it.

We won't do that, but I think it would work. And let's be honest, no one's going to publicly campaign against a porn ban.


But yeah, I think it would be good. They're currently in the midst of writing loads of reports about how much E.D. it causes.

Yes. Look at Sup Forums porn addictions. It's mostly to shemales and other nasty shit.

Porn was a mistake.

pay attention spain

you don't even know how to find posts by ID

what did i expect from spain anyway? place has always been garbage.

Stop watching porno.

>I can't wait until you're old enough

red herring
ad hom

>This isn't a high school debate.

subjective
holier than thou

> This is called "conversation."

subjective
irrelevant

> Do you talk like that IRL?

red herring
appeal to fear/violence

>actually believes this

Yes it's damaging but an outright ban would be an absolute failure. Just like drugs, the money is better spent educating and rehabilitating.

Cart before the horse.

Men jerk it to porn because women these days suck so much men aren't willing to make the sacrifices they used to.

Women bitch about men dropping out of society but if they just dropped a dress size learned to cook and cut out alcohol they'd find men would be rearing to go and would make the effort to be with them.

It's all about incentives.

>America suggests banning freedom

I don't watch porn more than once a month. Much in the same way I don't do drugs more than once a month. It rots your brain in excess.

I still enjoy it. Why should my freedom be impeded because of faggots with literally no self-control? Actually, make drugs legal, keep porn legal. It weeds out the sorriest losers from the gene pool.

>smartphones exist

Yeah no. The black market for porn would be huge at that point, and every decent looking girl would be making their school tuitions and drug money by whoring out their camera shows, selling private photos and so on.

Or maybe you should stop being such a fucking child and take responsibility for your own life instead of looking for an authority to take away your self-determination and need for self-restraint.

God damn you suck at being american.

don't ban it but educate people about it

I don't mean it should be hard banned, but it's propagation curtailed. The acess is too easy. I believe every site hosting porn should have to declare it and ISP take a opt-out stance on their blocking.
I was introduced to that crap earlier than I'm proud of

ITT:
>BAN EVERYTHING THAT I DONT LIKE

what's next? letting big brother watch over us?

It's not about ensuring that nobody ever sees porn again, or putting those who do in jail.

It's about eliminating it as a cultural and market force.

It'd be pointless to prosecute private consumers, but forcing commercial porn publishers to shut down and blocking all the well-known portals would have the net effect of drastically reducing porn consumption, no matter how imperfect of a solution it might be.

I support something like that 100%

Ban this man, his snake tongue speaks ill of the regime.

>Shouldn't cover things that cause public health crises

As an american, do you realize that your notion of letting public health concerns trump liberty would mean banning burgers, sugar, soda, red meat, alcohol, etc.?

Fuck off with the freedom hating collectivism you pinko commie bastard.

your viewpoint is one of malice because you view naturally harmful things as some sort of natural weeding mechanism.

You would have it be legal not for the sake of freedom, but for the sake that you find it pleasurable when other people fail or die. That's malice. So you may not watch a lot of porn or do a lot of drugs, but you are quite arguably a far worse person anyway.

Get on your boots and fight the addiction! Start by setting openDNS with a porn ban, and add an extensive list of Sup Forums boards/reddit subreddits to the blocklist.
If you ever feel like turning the filter off, go outside or take a cold shower.
You still need some effort, but this might remove triggers(in the original sense) and give you time to reflect if you ever feel like relapsing

This guy gets it.

Someone should post the Ren and Stimpy video about pornography being used as a subversive weapon.

Don't make assumptions about my intentions - I would have it legal for liberty as the primary reason.

The fact that it roots out shit-tier genes is more in line with the collectivist commie-logic used by Sup Forumsacks who want to ban porn for public health purposes. If you care so much about the benefit of some abstraction (the general populace), why not take it to its natural conclusion? If you're not fit to exercise the fucking quantum of self-restraint it takes to not watch porn all the time or not do drugs all the time, the collective would be better of if you died and didn't pass on your shit-tier genes.

And seriously no, it's not malice, it's empathy. You are never going to solve your fucking problem by hoping the government is going to ban your object of addiction. Drugs are illegal, that doesn't discourage drug abusers. Even if your hypothetical porn ban became reality, it wouldn't help you since you're already caught.

Literally the only thing that can stop your addiction is you man.

juice ban porn -> people revolt

it will never happen. porn and vidya/entertainment are the two biggest pacifiers of the plebs.

well the "natural conclusion" as you call it is merely what you've framed your point as. I can call it dog shit if I want.

But I'll play your game. There would have to be a system in place then to murder people if they could not show self-restraint. And there would have to be a council and a police force that would monitor people. There would have to be a system of strikes or "mess-ups" to green-light state sanctioned murder on these "shit-tier dead ends".

Of course I imagine you would see yourself in the commanding role of your state sanctioned murder squad. That way you don't have to answer for participating in it yourself and can pretend not to be a hypocrite.

just ban the national production of porn

besides porn isn't natural

there is a whole jewish industry producing, preying on girls of bad families

black cuckold producers are infiltrating our childrens networks

and interracial porn is produced at a loss JUST to PUSH IT, there isn't even any profit with it. That's fucking societal warfare right there.

Porn isn't a fucking dangerous highway, it's a weapon.

>That's fucking societal warfare right there.
>Porn isn't a fucking dangerous highway, it's a weapon.
some american gets it

I know my govrement is working towards internet porn ban.
Good riddance !