Were the Nazis the good guys? Why or why not?

Were the Nazis the good guys? Why or why not?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=SdoozfqeuFY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Revolution_of_1918–19
youtu.be/1tDOZOW0IFg?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEA565AE9D572F7CD
youtube.com/watch?v=Y5fbmEy1GL4
youtube.com/watch?v=K63PN2bxAXE
rense.com/general77/bols.htm
youtu.be/kzIRG525l6s
youtube.com/watch?v=lmGqG3grTrg
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Yes.

youtube.com/watch?v=SdoozfqeuFY

Because freind they were fighting for Europe's existence.

They saved millions from unemployment, they archived greatness.

Fucking yes Hitler did no wrong and was set up by the jews he took germany from the brink of collapse and made it into a superpower in less than 5 years. There is good reason to hate the jews. I feel if hitler kept to himself and didn't take the jewbait and start commiting mass genocide he would be look at as a hero instead of a villian.

Get redpilled friends
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Revolution_of_1918–19

unsure. it is possible they were the final opposition to the global banking cartel, but its also possible that their system was just as evil. At the very least history and media is heavily doctored in favor of the winners, so much so that people never really ask why ww2 started they simply believe it because "da evil nazis wuz killin the joos".

If i were you id do my research and come to my own conclusions.

Why didn't he just let them leave?

He did. Hundreds of thousands of jews fled Germany.

The only ones that were killed were the remainders in Germany.

Continued

You evere wonder why the left constantly compare anyone they disagree with to hitler it isn't because they're evil jew killing monster. In fact it should be considered a badge of honor to be compared to hitler. People often forget he did alot of good for germany yah so what if he killed a few jews. Jews have been proven through history to be greedy greedy gremlins. You wanna know the 1 thing every country should in order to be prosperous kick out the jew bankers. Look up the abraham lincoln and his greenbacks he was gonna revolutionize how the U.S issued it's own currency and this scared the jews which is why he was assassinated Hitler implemented this and made germany great in only a few years same goes for kennedy who wanted to abolish the fed. This is one thing I really hope Trump is finally able to achieve kick the jews out and america will be made great again.

ok but why didn't he let those ones escape? I'm led to believe there were heaps he imprisoned who could have just been led to believe they escaped.

No. Social Darwinism, rule of the stronger, inability to share. Also, lack of basic human decency.

He was still an asshole that incarcerated anyone with a dissenting worldview. Even before 1939.

Is anyone able to link me to a documentary that makes a strong case for the Nazis being the good guys?

And where would they go? Oh right. To Britain, America, the Communists and they would then do everything in their power to destroy Germany.

This is why the actually killing didn't start until later because the Nazis didn't properly think the whole "let the jews leave thing" through.

Maybe someone has the hitler redpill image I forgot to save it but basically hitler Invaded Poland after finding out the jews where commiting ethnic cleansing of native germans in a region on the border of poland. and they everyone allied against gemrnany. Basically is what happened.

History is written by the winner. Watch The greatest Story never told.

The Greatest Story Never Told.

Strongest case I've ever come across.

Ok but I feel like the same applies to genocide as in you can't do that without the world wanting to end you. Jews prefer UK and America anyways.

Hitler wasn't perfect but I don't think he was as bad as people make him out to be. I compare him more to a Saddam and Gaddafi.

I don't think we will ever find out the objective truth of history. Everything gets blurred and edited too much to the point that nothing is real unless you actually experienced it yourself.

no they werent

they were Europe's death blow. and by that I mean Europe used to rule the world and was by far the most advanced continent responsible for >95% of all scientific and technological progress. but WW2, caused by the German socialists, permanently pushed Europe towards the left and onto the path of self destruction on which we still are

classical liberalism died and Europe might never recover from the damage

Man being one of the chosen people rocks! we are so Alpha compared to you sheep.

Nazis were beta AF, Hitler was an arrogant fool who thought he could succeed where Napoleon failed and pushed his Army to go into battle unprepared and basically to their death
Only reason you neckbeards love him so much is because deep inside you know he's a beta just like you.

They didn't want to attack the UK or America to kill the jews there.

What they wanted was for political revolution in those countries after seeing the successes of Germany.

True I feel like this is one part of history most people are only ever taught one side. Did hitler do some terrible things yes was he all evil no of coarse not.

Research the Havaara Agreement and Project Madagascar.
The Nazi Government wasted TONS of money trying to help the ungrateful Jew

No only edgelords think otherwise

Where's the source on the genocide?

Isn't it rightful to remove manipulative ideologies and other harmful influences if they affect you and your people?

Don't be a fool, brother.

>biggest genocide in human history
>skulls on helmets
>good guys
No.

As the other guy said to you, Greatest Story Never Told
youtu.be/1tDOZOW0IFg?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe

one third of the Holocaust is also a very good documentary
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEA565AE9D572F7CD

...

Asking a question like this on Sup Forums will simply give you a biased answer. Many outspoken people on here are Nazi sympathizers.

I dunno how many he killed and I don't honestly care yah He probably killed alot of people but I look at solely the positives of what he did for germany at the time he was leader. He was the first person to succefully rout the jew and they destroyed him so thoroughly that no one would dare challenge them ever again.

Ok but I feel like they didn't need to kill the jews to accomplish that. Sure they needed revolution but at a law level where capitalism was outlawed.

It's sad how people feel the need to manipulate everyone into picking a side. Just look at how much is known about Hillary but completely ignored.

Killing them just cost them more in the end. Hitler had the following to change the government into an anti capitalist anti immigration powerhouse. It baffles me as to why they felt they needed to take on the whole world when germany would have been a perfect fortress against capitalism and multiculturalism.

yup. triumph of the will makes the very point in the intro.
Jews have a law that says "eye for an eye", so they have no right to complain when they get rekt for all the naughty shit they do.
Line up Schlomos and Steins, you asked for it.

Ask yourself this question.
What sort of person would be a Nazi sympathizer if they weren't highly educated on the subject?
An edgy 13 year old middle schooler yelling "SPIG FLAIL" In the middle of class, that's who.
Anyone who takes National Socialism or Hitler seriously has spent countless hours researching the history to defend their beliefs to others.

There's no real bias. There's only resignation, that the people we've been trained from youth to trust, IE teachers, Parents and the government have lied to us in order to finance a genocide through national tariffs that go directly to the powers of Zion.

Look up the Balfour Declaration and tell me the jew is to be trusted

I don't believe in the lies of the Holocaust. Hitler's Mercy cost him much much much more than simply a single bullet to every Jew's skull.

I think they love him because they agree with him.

History is often written from the views of the conquerer. Did you know before the Europeans invaded america the Native American population was at the height of it's power. to bad they all died to smallpox.

>Ok but I feel like they didn't need to kill the jews to accomplish that. Sure they needed revolution but at a law level where capitalism was outlawed.

You sound earnest but a little misguided. The main stance of the Nazis was one of "Fuck the right, fuck the left, fuck capitalism, fuck communism."

The Jews continually plotted against the Germans through political subversion. Hence why they are still so prolific in every western government in the world.

It was the final solution, a permanent fix.

That's what happens when you fuck with a Lion, they get skulls on their caps.

>"Biggest genocide in human history"
Are you joking dude? The Bolshevik Jews of Russia systematically killed over at least 30 million white people during ww2

youtube.com/watch?v=Y5fbmEy1GL4

It doesn't justify it. Laws should be passed to stop toxic cultures from ruining a country including the ones that are about genocide.

It would have been fine to stop capitalism without mass murder.

Is germany still anti capitalism? Seems like they take part in global capitalism but I don't know what it's like there. Also I'm surprised they took in so many refugees without supportive infrastructure to do it and how that situation even happens to countries.

It isn't as simple as that.

I would say yes, but killing 6 million Jews was wrong. It was a good attempt to protect the future from Jewry but let's be honest, most killed were innocent. Not all Jews were Globalists and bankers.

>Sen young german Bauers to die in distant Ukraine
>good goys!

Bolshevik revolution killed more people.
Holodomor killed more people.
allied firebombing and occupation of Germany killed more people.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki achieved the fastest death rate per time in all of history.

>spooky skeleton symbols

Man those evil fucks.

I think the contrary to your post would happen anywhere else, and it would be good to weigh the favorable views of nazism with the bad.

You could ask the same question on reddit and be banned. Here it will be freely discussed, and you can mold your own view of the negatives and positives.

Shame there's irrefutable proof that the holocaust narrative is flawed at best or an outright lie at worst.
Simple Math completely debunks the traditionalist narrative.

So did the holocaust happen? This is still a possibility.
However, given the math. The numbers must be incredibly inflated, even by today's standard of revision reflected by the international holocaust memorial.

>The Bolshevik Jews of Russia systematically killed over at least 30 million white people during ww2
Wad.
>Bolshevik revolution killed more people.
Wad.
>Holodomor killed more people.
Wad.

Are you serious guys? Have you read anything in your life or you just say things that "feels true I'm sure it's true"?

Anti-Communism, good.
Socialism, bad.
Anti-Christian and occult/Paganism, bad.
Nationalist, good.
Politically incorrect, good.
Proud of their race, good.

youtube.com/watch?v=K63PN2bxAXE

rense.com/general77/bols.htm

Had good intentions but ended up doing more damage than good.

...

>Citing a youtube video
>Citing Solzhenitsyn's """stats"""
Wew lad.

I think there is many lies on both sides.

Many natives and islanders were completely wiped out by disease. Never understood how this happens.

Did Germany accomplish what they wanted in the end? Was propaganda about the holocaust hyperbole to justify USA occupation of Germany?

Do you believe everything you read? I like Russians because you are free of western propaganda mostly but are also on the other side of the coin with different propaganda. Together we can find many truths, vodka and beers at my place, cheers.

Concentration camps is euphemism for death camps, but it means literally the same.

>Do you believe everything you read?
Of course not, but here's a deal they are saying things not only untrue but ridiculously untrue.

This is pretty much how I see hitler he had good intentions and ideas but ultimately did more harm then good.

There's a fucking million sources on it, google it faggot

No, concentration camp in this context means labor camps

I mean there are crazy lads like a writer-story-teller Solzhenitsyn who was making up numbers and he even has a famous saying in his interview where he said that Soviets killed "one and a half thousands of millions" people. An interviewer asked again but he repeated it lol (it's not only stupid but also grammatically incorrect in Russian. you have to say billion in that case)

Arbeit macht frei literally means work sets you free, it was labor camps.

Why waste resources on killing people you can force to work for you? Makes 0 sense.

Did he get baited into going too far by the jews, and if so how?

It makes me think of how many other leaders thought they were doing good but fell right into the path the enemy wanted them to go. On a smaller scale Trump baited Hillary into running a negative campaign which backfired bigger than any political race I have ever heard of. Hillary could have let Trump lose by himself and she could have copied his simple catch phrase ways instead of lying through her teeth with many words and fake crazy eyed smiles.

Hitler sent jews to labour camps because they were conspiring against the country.
But how is sending jewish children to these camp defendable? Were jewish children conspiring and squeezing the German people dry?

I think it's complicated because it's like fighting against a mafia. The kids are going to grow up and want revenge, which they ultimately got through global pity and controlling a massive part of western media (if not all).

What would be the alternative? Isn't it better they are with their families? You're implying they got mistreated.

It would be cruel to split families up.

Here you go

youtu.be/kzIRG525l6s here you go op

How is removing dissenters a bad thing when you're correct? Wouldn't that make their dissent unjust?

If I imprisoned every person who denied the sky being blue so that my country's civil discourse wouldn't be full of wasted time and retarded bullshit, how is that a bad thing?

they were good guys because they helped to rebuild Europe and they were bad because they destroyed Europe

youtube.com/watch?v=lmGqG3grTrg

WW2 in one post

>WWI ends, everyone blames Germany
>Cucks Germany out of their military and economy
>Commies stage a revolution but fail miserably
>Hitler sees all the destitution and starts his own party
>Stages a coup, members of party died, Hitler goes to jail
>Writes Mein Kampf, many people read it
>Gets -ELECTED- to Chancellor by German People
>Enacts a bunch of reforms, gives economy and military power back to German people
>Globalist kikes get mad that he did this
>Hitler then starts taking land back that was seceded from them after WWI
>Globalist kikes furious
>Territorial dispute with Poland, Germany invades
>Winston Cuckshill and French nobody declare war
>Nothing happens for months
>War starts, Germany kicks ass
>Stalemate with Britain, Hitler then focuses on Stalin
>OH SHIT BRITS OUT OF NOWHERE
>OH SHIT CYKA BLAT OUR TOTAL WAR PRODUCTION IS RIDICULOUS t.STALIN
>two front war, hitler gets his shit kicked
>kills himself

What about the kikes?

>during the war hitler rounds up all the kikes and puts them in camps
>the camps were in good condition, they had modern amenities for the time
>war breaks out and supplies become tight
>kikes no longer receive supplies or food so they starve
>typhus, TB and many other diseases break out in the camps
>thank you hungry skeletals
>after the war the kikes say "MUH HOLOCAUST" to get sweet reparation shekels and Israel from Great Cucktain
>this brings us to the world today

That picture's a lie. Buchenwald was a death camp.

Good point.

But what about the retards and the homos who where also sent to the camps? I can't imagine a downs syndrome mastermind conspiring and fucking up a country with his intellect.

They should have quit while they were ahead.

Hitler suffering from mustard gas poisoning and untreated PTSD probably didn't help.

The only source that shows is Solzhenitsyn's fantasies, really. Soviet Union lost about 24 millions during the world war II, that's impossible to loose that many during the revolution. Holodomor was even less deathly (12 millions the most crazy estimate, but most scholars say that even 6.5 including birth losses is a crazy overestimate). It's incredibly incomparable events, lad.

You've heard the saying "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree."

The majority of Jews are demonstrably manipulative and nepotistic by nature. Germans had already witnessed their lineage of usury for generations following their grant for equal citizenship, from Karl Marx to the November Revolution. At some point, you have to admit that the problem spans beyond a series of coincidentally similar individuals.

If you are willing to accept that aspects of human personality are inherited, then you must also accept the reality that wicked people have wicked children.

What's the Sup Forums recommended edition of Mein Kampf? None of this ADL abridged shit.

I did not know about the Israel thing, damn that gives a pretty big motive.

my mother was born in 33. she remembers people being afraid speaking openly. yeah, he was a complete and total utter asshole.

yeah and who can rightfully claim to hold the truth(tm)? you? hitler? i dont trust any single person's judgement. the truth needs emerge in the heat of extended debate. oppression is for cowards and weaklings who don't trust that their worldview will prevail in open warfare of ideas.

anybody can claim that their ideas are correct. it's juist an empty claim of people who cannot stand dissent. these people don't care about right or wrong, they care about power for themselves.

>how is that a bad thing?
because in life a lot of things are less clear-cut than "the sky is blue" and sooner or later you'd incarcerate people who are actually right, only just oppsed to your own wrong worldview.
no, the truth must emerge in battle of words and ideas. everything else is for whimps and powerthirsty egomaniacs.

>Were the n̶a̶z̶i̶s̶ National Socialists the good guys?
Yes, they were. They were successful in every aspect of life and managed to redeem a broken economy in very few years. Given less resistance from the Globalists/Marxists/Bolshevists all of Europe would have entered a golden age.

Ever hear the expression
>To make an omelette you have to crack a few eggs

Faggots can't reproduce and therefore can't keep a nationalist society moving forward. They are morally abhorrent and tools of the Ultra-Left agenda.
Have you seen their pride parades? have you seen that pic of the faggot sucking his own dick in the middle of a public space? Yeah.

Hitler didn't intern ALL the homosexuals. But even then, the homos were massively left wing.

As for the downsies. Who really cares. They're a mistake and don't need to exist.

>ReCAPTCHA: Select all the trains.
Heh...

Why would you delibirately spread misinformation?

The original 1939 translation by Murphy

lel, no
first of all
>Commies stage a revolution but fail miserably
must read
>commies, centrists and the far right all wrestle for power, the centrist forces initially prevail

secondly,
>Gets -ELECTED- to Chancellor by German People
must read
>gets -APPOINTED- to Chancellor and only wins elections later after oppressing the opposition with means of the state
thirdly,
>Enacts a bunch of reforms, gives economy and military power back to German people
should be supplemented by
>these reforms cost so much money that he was forced to later invade other countries and steal their stuff to pay the bills

as for the rest, I can't be bothered to read this BS

Found the Jew.

wheres your sources kike?

...

they are thugs who will blame all of society's problems on some scapegoat and then start a war financed by MEFO bills

>not a jew
>not for immigration
>not a jew
>not a jew
>not a jew
>not a jew


Stormfags in charge of making a truthful macro.

this

/thread

And when they got rid of that "scapegoat" society and economy thrived

Are there some red-pilled books on how the jews are connected to:
- Communism & Marxism
- Russian revolution
- German revolution
- WWI
- Forcing Hitler to go into WWII?

>no they werent
>they were Europe's death blow

This.

National Socialism also showed that a country doesn't need a (((central bank))) to be prosperous. Interesting that the same "people" who fear National Socialism are the same ones who own the (((banks))), I think that is just pure coincidence though.

looking at current events, no, Hitler probably wasn't wrong at all, unironically.

But he could have done it in a much better way, a not going heads to heads against russia and putting jews on concentration camps kind of way.

Euthanasia was practiced in more countries than just Germany, the whole thing actually stems from the US. Same thing for racial biology and genetics.
Hitler died for all of our sins, burgers in particular project as hard on him as they can. I mean, what's the connection between nogs and Hitler again?

Here you go, Olav.

(((German socialists)))