Daily reminder that in any other functioning democracy, Hillary Clinton would have rightfully been declared President

Daily reminder that in any other functioning democracy, Hillary Clinton would have rightfully been declared President.
Trump lost the popular vote. More Americans wanted Hillary.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pUN6FsQFOkY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

Reminder that UKIP was the third highest voted party in the UK but only has one seat .

If the rules were different, they would have campaigned differently and the results would have been different.

>other

We're a Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy. If it were all about the popular vote, then you'd only see them campaigning in huge cities while the remaining 99% of the country got shunned.

Also, 3 million illegal aliens and dead people contributing to her votes doesn't win her anything. The projected final tally after military absentee ballots were counted would have still given him the win.

> reminder that in functional democracy, neither Trump, nor Clinton could have run for election
> reminder that current democracies are intently disfunctional, a charade employed to give the illusion of choice and pointless wirtschaft, placating the populace

In any other democracy voting behavior would be entirely different, because people base it on the electoral college system.

Who else here a little happy trump lost the popular just bc it makes more buttmad people?

Hope weed is made illegal for the same reason

>this thread again

5pbp

USA is a republic

Sauce on the military projection? Why haven't they counted them?

>muh popular vote
gg no re cry more qq

There is no pure (winner-take-all) democracy anywhere on the planet.

Reminder that, she lost, conceded and Trump will be President next year.

Clinton lost the election, fully knowing the terms and rules and there is nothing you or anyone else can do about it.

Trump won the popular vote in a majority of states

Hillary won 22

Trump won 28

That's a six state lead. So your saying the person who wins less States should be president?

Let's say each state gets one electoral vote each.

Trump still wins. Now consider that you were given a very generous 55 electoral points

Which you would still have even if only 10 people voted in California at all.


Britain uses the same system. You have to win a majority of seats to win. Not just popular vote.

daily reminder that she lost because she was a terrible candidate and you are a fucking sore loser who sulks 24/7

God bless this republic.

You forgot your leaf.

Fuck you, why should liberal California decide the president for us ?

>illegal immigrant voters
>functioning democracy
pick one

Dumbass leftists like this are why we need National Socialism.

Daily reminder that only like 1 country in the entire world do elections based solely on the popular vote. Fucking retards repeating talking heads that lie on tv sigh

More Americans wanted Trump in the states he won, and that is how our elections are decided.

>Let's appeal only to the 15 largest cities and ignore every other county!
Fascism

new nerd virgin confirmed these threads reek of shit SAGE

Not in a parliamentary democracy.

>We're a Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy.
Constitutional Republic is a type of democracy.

It's funny, if the USA had the election system of the UK President-Elect Donald Trump (pbuh) would have won over 630 of 650 seats in Parliament through the fptp commons system.

Actually, if we had a functioning Democracy Bernie or a third party candidate would be president, because in a functioning Democracy parties wouldn't have the ability to destroy opposition through collusion with the media and the government and be able to get away with it. Also, the commission that decides who gets to debate wouldn't be a private corporation run by Democrats and Republicans basing their 15% polling threshold on polls conducted by media orgs that have conflicts of interest with those parties.

But hey, Dems voted for the lesser of two evils and they got exactly what they should have expected: evil.

>USA is a republic
Correct, the USA has a president not a King.

What of it?

well to bad shill. hillary isnt the president and welfare is going to vanish.

nigs will starve in the streets and fight with the surrounding people only to be put down like the rabid dogs they are by police

they abortion will be illegal and bitches that do it will go to jail and be whored out by prison guards. this will end any hope of a left take over in 4 or 8 years. 1k years of right wing ideology dominate in america

>Most of the state's Trump won he won by 2-5%
>Every state Hillary won she won by less than a percent

UNPOPULAR CANDIDATE

>other functioning democracy
Reminder that the US is not a democracy

It was never a democracy, it's a republic.

This. The popular vote argument is retarded. Factor in the voters who stay home due to electoral college and you will still get a Republican president. Sorry, cucks.

How much electoral college votes constitute a landslide? 290 against 232 is quite strong of a mandate. Did Trump win in a landslide?

Daily reminder we are a republic, not a democracy like everyone believes

So, Switzerland is not a functioning democracy but France is?

kys

Also factor in all the illegal voting because no voter ID laws.

It means, retard, that popular vote of citizens doesn't matter. The founding fathers recognized the dangers of pure democracy, that's why in REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC, I'll repeat that for you incase your retardation blocked it from getting through your skull in a REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC, decisions are handles at the level of elected representatives, the reason the votes are handled at state levels in this respect is so that areas of the U.S with higher populations such as New York or California don't get to decide the entire course of our country over the next four years even though the entirety of the midwest would have voted vastly differently.

Understand now, shill?

>Daily reminder that in any other functioning democracy, Hillary Clinton would have rightfully been declared President.

Except that's not true because most democratic countries have similar systems. The UK has a very similar FPTP system

>functioning democracy
you guys love throwing around buzz words don't you?

Daily reminder that even in the third world, they have voter ID.

Instead of that, why don't you explain why your credentials in governmental affairs free republics is better than Ben Franklin's?

Americans are dipshits. Also the popular vote was rigged and millions of dead people and illegal immigrants voted for hillary.

Reminder that many European countries elect coalitions of globalist cucks to keep right wing parties out of power and many of them will do it again soon

Reminder that the SNP won 1.5 million votes (out of a uk pop of 65 m) but has 56/650 MPs

Reminder UKIP came third but has one mp

The next time a leftist moans about the electoral college system I'll split his fucking face open

oh God another thread about this.

Let it go cunt, it's over. You still make posts about something else that pissed you off last year?

It's the way the system works. If popular vote would be the goal it would change the dynamics of politics, campaigns and not for the better. People in low pop areas/states would be forgotten, forever.

Daily reminder the United States is NOT a direct democracy.

As far as I know, they usually don't count the vast majority of military votes

But not a pure democracy, faggot

and that's the whole point

Californians wanted this

...

In a functioning democracy illegal aliens wouldn't be voting.

This. It's insane to me that you don't have to show ID when voting.

Take 5 million votes from Hillary Clinton because 5 million or so illegals probably voted in California and New York

The only reason the dems won't let a law pass requiring ID is because they get enough illegal votes to make a difference in their favor.

>It means, retard, that popular vote of citizens doesn't matter.
No it doesn't.
Republic means no hereditary rulers or titles. Nothing else.

Democracy can elect representatives and still be a democracy.

>is so that areas of the U.S with higher populations such as New York or California don't get to decide the entire course of our country over the next four years even though the entirety of the midwest would have voted vastly differently.

That's totally false. Each state gets 2 electors + 1 / unit of population. If the unit of population is large enough they can carry the whole election. If New York and California had enough population and were winner take all they would pick the president.

The real issue isn't with the 2+population electors. It's with winner take all states that ignores the votes of millions.

>The real issue isn't with the 2+population electors. It's with winner take all states that ignores the votes of millions.

So, you're saying California and New York should be carved into pieces so that Californian/New Yorker Republicans actually get a say in elections?

>But not a pure democracy, faggot

You likely mean direct democracy. Although with the proposition system that isn't nearly as clear as it was.

The USA isn't a direct democracy, true. But their are far more types of democracy than direct.

ironically all that red contributes about 10% of our GDP. it's called flyover country for a reason

More illegals voted for Hillary.

I know you "kids" cant do da math. But when 3 million illegals vote for Hillary and she won popular vote by 400,000 votes, you understand she cheated.....

>So, you're saying California and New York should be carved into pieces so that Californian/New Yorker Republicans actually get a say in elections?

Keep them as states but allow electors to be proportional to the state's vote.

So if they have 50 EC votes then if you win 10% you get 5. If you win 50% you get 25.

>UNITED States
>Implying three virtually all-blue states can and may dictate their will
>A good thing you have an electoral college

Same thing in my country.
Nothing wrong with that.

>47.2%
>47.9%

>4 million difference

I like how you'e so insecure in your argument that despite her winning the popular vote, you shopped it so she got millions extra.

>Muh GDP
>Everytime
Which is then regulated so poorly by liberal policy that it *raises* the national debt. It takes a liberal state to turn income into a debt burden.

Companies go to cali because the landscape is pleasant, not because the policy works. Look at residential movement maps, people are leaving in droves.

Why should a city be able to dictate to the rest of the state which way to vote? Cities are practically echo chambers.

youtube.com/watch?v=pUN6FsQFOkY

If you subtract out all the voter fraud Trump got a land slide.

>Why should a city be able to dictate to the rest of the state which way to vote? Cities are practically echo chambers.

Exactly which is why you go proportional.

can you eat GDP?

Also, I don't see you fucks crying about the fact that every state has two senators no matter their population

Doesn't answer my question.

Proportionality can't deal with echo chambers at all.

We don't live in a democracy cuck, its a republic.

We are not a type of democracy, we don't even fall into the same line as it, we are closer to an oligarchy.

>More Americans wanted Hillary.
more americans didn't vote
you fucking retard
>120m votes
>more than twice that are people capable of voting

>SNP: 1.4M votes = 56 Seats
>UKIP: 4M Votes= 1 seat
>MFW SNP say ukip are unelected and shouldn't have effected the Brexit vote as greatly as they did

Suck it. Hillary knew the rules going in. She played by the rules and lost by the rules. Hillary isn't trying to make this pathetic argument, so why are you? Follow your leader's example and at least TRY to lose with dignity.

>Doesn't answer my question.
>Proportionality can't deal with echo chambers at all.

I answered the question by implication. If the state assigns electors by proportion then a city will only have a say in direct proportion to the number of people that voted in one way. And people that are outside of the city get representation in proportion to how they voted.

What do you mean they can't deal with echo chambers?

Daily reminder that in a functioning democracy you don't span an entire continent.

Does this include California and NY?

...

Switzerland is essentially a colony of the E.U, with racist colonists and a boring way of life. No new movements has ever came out of switzerland. No Swiss has ever known glory. It is a land that do not change, ever. Consequently, it does not live either.

She won NY by 40% IIRC

oh hey, wow, boo fucking hoo, who gives a shit -)
sage that shit, others need to see your tears

Daily reminder that the Tutsi clan wishes they had pushed harder for a constitutional republic instead of that pure-democracy, but it sounded so good at the time.

God you are so fucking stupid. The US is a "functioning democracy" you twat. We are what you call a "representative democracy" understand? That means we have a congress that is made up of representatives and senators with representation per state roughly equal to population of the state.

The executive branch is elected through the Electoral College system. This is part of our constitution. It was done to ensure that the vote would represent the entirety of the country, and not just the votes of those in large coastal cities.

It's really quite simple. Are you this uneducated or willfully ignorant?

The picture in your post tells you all you need to know, 290 to 232. The vote was fair, democratic and decisive.

If you want a "pure democracy", we would need a parliamentary system like Europe. In such a system each persons vote is significant in choosing the government. Multiple parties receive votes, and the government is constructed based on the proportions. The largest party then picks what is called the "Prime Minister".

Get it?

How does that even work?

Weren't Tutsis the minority?

but I thought that many states don't require IDs to vote, so many illegals get to vote so it doesn't count

Kinda, as I love libtard tears, but Trump has already said he'll leave weed to individual states, so that's also a bonus.

Also weed is already illegal.

...

...

Daily reminder that America is not a democracy

fuck you and fuck your 6 million illegal alien votes

Also serves as a daily reminder that these liberal morons often need to move the goalposts.
They should focus on not losing to begin with.

THE US IS NOT A DEMOCRACY
>more Americans wanted hillary
like how 3 million illegal mexicans voted for hillary?

>any other functioning democracy
We're a Republic you idiot.

You people (if you aren't shitposting) just don't seem to understand how the thing you are suggesting goes directly against rule of law, the central component of a functioning democracy - because you are complaining about the results after he won LEGALLY. The US electoral system is written in your Constitution, and it was followed. 40% of people didn't vote at all at your elections, and now people are complaining about the result.

Trump won.

Deal with it.

>THE US IS NOT A DEMOCRACY
>We're a Republic you idiot.

The USA is both a republic and a democracy.

It's a democracy because their is meaningful voting. It's a republic because their is no monarchy.