I took the Hitler Red Pill, where do I go from here?

I took the Hitler Red Pill, where do I go from here?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=y-Yszp3SmxE
amazon.com/Letters-Liberty-Religious-Important-Subjects/dp/0865971293/ref=la_B001KIN7G0_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1479687727&sr=1-1
nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/hitler-1922.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhineland_Bastard
youtube.com/watch?v=7zv4U1NZpl8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

turn 18

Why do you think it's cool to kill jews and minorities

The ultimate red pill is to understand Janet Jackson's art.

shoot up black church?

This, forever.

Flip to page 32

Ends justify means

fpbp

Getting out of your parents basement and find a fay to remove that hideous acne

You mature into a moderate conservative, or you degenerate into an untermensch skinhead

He didn't kill jews or minorities.

Depression until the uprising begins, then endless joy.

>ameridiot education

youtube.com/watch?v=y-Yszp3SmxE

Down the rabbit hole.

Brainwashed. If you're here there's a good chance you don't believe or trust the media. Why should you trust the media of the past?
neo-nazi's are subhuman.
Falklands.
Where?

What? google says Janet Jackson is just an american singer song writer, is it someone else?

Check out communism to enhance your knowledge about propaganda
go die in a fire citr shill

>If you're here there's a good chance you don't believe or trust the media.

I don't

>Why should you trust the media of the past?

Because you don't need to look at the media to prove that the Nazi government was a racial supremacist group which actively harassed and assaulted non-Germans. You can read it in German writings, you can read it in the field officer reports, you can read it in the firsthand accounts of Slavic survivors of Nazi German tyranny. You have to be seriously retarded to believe that the Nazi regime wasn't a racist regime.

If you want to go 1488 gas the kikes at least be honest about it, but I can't stand you NatSocs who aren't even honest about your ideology.

I guess.

Racist is bad?

>where do I go

Leave your degenerate lifestyle behind and accept Volkisch philosophers like Evola.

>I took the Hitler Red Pill, where do I go from here?

Read what I have linked (image related):

>amazon.com/Letters-Liberty-Religious-Important-Subjects/dp/0865971293/ref=la_B001KIN7G0_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1479687727&sr=1-1

I generally believe ANY regime founded on discriminatory policies is unsustainable. As soon as they defeat or destroy their primary enemy, they will find another, and another, and eventually turn on each other. It all ends in tyranny and senseless bloodshed.

1488

Like liberals?

>He fell for the racial supremacist memes
>implying the Nazis weren't inherently 1848 revolutions tier when it came to the liberation of other ethnic nations from foreign rule
>implying you wouldn't massacre villages in times of war with the death squad you rolled with in opposition to the coming communist waves which would see you swinging from a tree
>implying Slavic partisan groups didn't join the Nazis to hunt down communists

>nazis on a politically incorrect board is ctr shilling

Redditfags leave.

They weren't. Jews commanded over 100,000 nazi troops, there were 60,000 arabian ss troops, more in africa and Japan.

Holocaust was a hoax, there is no technical evidence to support any of the claims and many of the buildings were retrofitted to make the appearance of chambers. What's typhus?

I don't want to go 1488, that's neo-nazi scum shit, this is about nationalism. Nazi's were about their homeland and urged other ethnicity to follow suite and fight for their people.

Stalin had gulags. After WWII FDR had camps where germans were not given food or water, millions died. In Canada it's illegal to say the holocaust didn't happen, fun.

>Canadian education, doesn't trust media, trusts media.

You think the superbowl (((scandal))) was merely a coincidence? Google "Denise Gaines".

>Take the iron pull
>redpill a qt 3.14 aryan gf
>raise white children to be proud of their race

That's pretty much it.

I already work out, I'm not white, and have a good diet & job.

>I generally believe ANY regime founded on discriminatory policies is unsustainable. As soon as they defeat or destroy their primary enemy, they will find another, and another, and eventually turn on each other. It all ends in tyranny and senseless bloodshed.

Strawman. Not every authoritarian ideology is hell bent on imperialism. While the economic miracle which Hitler implemented was designed to annex former German lands which were taken from them in the Treaty of Versailles, it also anticipated the coming Soviet Invasion/ infiltration of Europe through his rule. The end goal of the natsocs was to end (((capitalism))) and communism from exploiting people. WW 1 played a huge impact on this seeing as how it was fought over banking interests and colonial tensions in the middle east/ Africa

This, once the presumed boogeyman is defeated you either need to create another one or civil war happens

Then just try to spread individual ethnic nationalism and anti-imperialism through your folk. It doesn't matter what race, really.

now you wait for rahowa that never comes and partake in the eternal ride of black pills and white pills until you eventually go insane

The only people who legitimately believe this are those who have zero understanding of war. Where are you getting this meme from?

Are you spic or nog?

History, you always need an enemy even if you arent at war

Watch as history repeats itself. Just with different actors. Join CTR to make it happen faster.

Kill bankers.

This is what the US does though. The main difference is the Germans had principles, the US renounces all principles and ideals except the market.

nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/hitler-1922.html

I think Hitler had a good understanding of war and people.

like progressives, modern liberals, yeah. They're a divisive group doomed to fail.

I don't know what to tell you guys if you're this wilfully blind. Read Mein Kampf. Hitler talks continually about obtaining 'lebensraum', living space for Germans via a "Drang nach Osten", a thrust Eastward. Read about the Hunger Plan, which was revealed to have been endorsed by German High Command during the invasion of Russia. The plan was to seize all of the foodstuffs in occupied territories. The Nazis were pleased by this, as it would allow them to wage war for longer, AND starve 10 million Slavs to death, allowing for open land to reward veterans with after the war.

Read about the laws implemented during the Nazi regime. The Nuremburg laws. Do some reading on occupied territories.

It's like with the Muslims. I can at least respect the ones that come outright and say "yes, I want the whole world to submit to Islam." It's the sniveling little cowards that hide their true views that I can't stand.

Valhalla

I have seen this picture before but I never realized where it were taken before.

You go do some actual research and realize that Hitler and the Nazi High command fucked up majorly and fell into the same traps that they publicly condemned. The message might be good, but don't delude yourself into thinking they were perfect.

The Nazis lost because the Nazi Party was incompetent as fuck and made to many dumb decisions and unforced errors.

Hitler was an idiot. His refusal to allow a breakout from Stalingrad was idiotic. Hitler made the Allies' job much easier.

The Nazi regime was incredibly imperialistic, I have no idea how you could believe otherwise. Also discriminatory regime does not necessarily equal authoritarian regimes. The most discriminatory regimes tend to be authoritarian, but there have been plenty of republican discriminatory regimes.

>History, you always need an enemy even if you arent at war

Are you retarded? People's drive to self preservation doesn't come from the base roots of hating others Trying to preserve yourself leads to hatred when another being whose sole purpose is to disrupt self preservation of another comes along. Self preservation leads to hatred, not the other way around. Imperialism is not an answer to the Malthus' question on population expansion , population expansion being the prime determinate of war. Rivalry does not equate to war in an authoritarian state designed to preserve itself from impending doom by another leftist revolution, one leading to Jacobin rule throughout all of Europe. History is neither a fully linear of cyclical function. What you're trying to get into is a basic ontological concept, although it being ontology it takes awhile to understand.

you win :D

I'm not a fan of Americanization.

I love how there iz zero context for this entire quote on the rest of the site. I can go into detail as to why you would feel the exact same way, and why many German jews decided to side with Hitler on this point as well. Let me ask you, which jews did Hitler want to destroy

>Hunger Plan

Looks like we have a Marxist here.
>>>/leftypol/ muh Holodomor never happened

on the topic of the Lebensraum it was more about German unification and the reversal of the Treaty of Versailles

>The Nuremburg laws
It was to separate Jewish influence that were later put into work camps to break their zionism.
Mien Kampf was written before Hitler was in power.
>Hunger Law
It stated that food will be prioritized towards Germans first, in german-soviet occupied territories. I would do the same, so would any other competent person.
>Muslim straw
It was never about submitting to world to Nazism. It was about protecting Europe from the communist threat and the UK were already planning on attacking Germany before the war because the economy was becoming a threat.

WWI, Balfour Declaration.

>The Nazi regime was incredibly imperialistic,

Vichy France and the unified effort to combat communism doesn't count as imperialism. Germans recruited other races into their ranks on the concept of self sustaining ethnic nations. There wasn't even enough time for Nazi Germany to exist for it to being imperialists, unless your definition of Imperialism is capitalism/ fascism for some reason.

Life preservation isnt the same as preservation of the ruling state.

Youre talking about 2 different things with hatred and life preservation

We are talking about the state as the whole youre talking about individuals

Civil unrest and political manuevering is what happens in an authoritarian state

Youre looking at war as a mobilization of troops, normal warfare

Whats the tall building in Hitler's left? Looks beautiful, would visit

>>((Capitalism))
Do you even ascetic protestantism, my dude?

I think you fundamentally misunderstand Human nature. Humans have a violent streak and a penchant for rivalry. People have been killing each other over patches of land since the dawn of time, and there are countless examples of unprovoked aggression. Sure, you say that Nazis feared an impending Communist wave, and you're likely right. The Soviets were growing ever stronger and funding movements abroad after Stalin's commitment to international revolution. However, violence begets violence. Let's say the Nazis purged Communism from their borders and defeated the Soviets; the sword has already been unleashed on the populace. Next it will be used to cull those that are not sufficiently loyal, and sooner than later you have a totalitarian state. That ultimate violence, once visited on the citizenry, won't be given up. Even by 1944 top Germans were attempting to assassinate Hitler because his paranoia and megalomania was now actively inflicting itself on high ranking Germans. They were fine when it was the Jews, Communists, Gypsies and Slavs being treated to Hitler's fury, but when he turned on them they realized too late the beast they had backed.

I'm no-where near a Communist/Marxist/whatever. But I'll bet you dispute the authenticity of evidence presented at Nuremberg? Even though I'm sure you've not watched the trials.

See my paragraph in the beginning. Even if the intention was only to use violence against communists, you can't put that genie back in the bottle when it's out.

Venturing beyond national/ethnic borders and conquering foreign populations is what I'd consider imperialistic.

>We are talking about the state as the whole youre talking about individuals

And here we go with the lolbertarian/ anarchistic pathologizing of the state into a boogeyman. The ruling state of Nazi Germany had a core criterion of the preservation of Germany and the German people as a whole, the State therefore assumed the role as a democratically empowered extension of the German people's well being and self preservation. As for Hitler's post war plans, from the natsocs I've talked to, the loosely neopaganist society was opting for a renewal in the environment and in a decrease in industrialization. This would be the militarized state disarming itself after having fulfilled its duty to protect the people.

Watch WW2 documentaries and get depressed when the Nazis get BTFO.

Dream about living in an alternate timeline.

research the word
>Aryan

Why do you idealize the winners of the war? You realize that the only account from the Nazi's that they did any harm to jews was from someone they tortured and threatened his family, right? You realize the whole holocaust thing was to get payments from Germany and to take their assets which are in the Fed Reserve in NY, right?

Back to the food. It was about the allocation of food to be given a priority to the German people. It's not about communism, most of the people under Stalin didn't want to be in a communist system nor did any of the surrounding states.

Poland? You mean the same Poles that were killing German minorities and fucking up their businesses/farms? Of which Stalin also invaded with the pact? Also Stalin was fronting for war two years before WWII and so was Great Britain, so Hitler went into Czech to stop the massacre of more German minorities. Why don't you look at the imperialism of UK and France? They had empires, Germany at the time did not until WW2.

>I think you fundamentally misunderstand Human nature. Humans have a violent streak and a penchant for rivalry. People have been killing each other over patches of land since the dawn of time, and there are countless examples of unprovoked aggression. Sure, you say that Nazis feared an impending Communist wave, and you're likely right. The Soviets were growing ever stronger and funding movements abroad after Stalin's commitment to international revolution. However, violence begets violence. Let's say the Nazis purged Communism from their borders and defeated the Soviets; the sword has already been unleashed on the populace. Next it will be used to cull those that are not sufficiently loyal, and sooner than later you have a totalitarian state. That ultimate violence, once visited on the citizenry, won't be given up.

Oh so you're on of this proto-nihilistic fags who assumes that the brutality of war can never have a catharsis and must end in a matter similar to the Shakespearian tragedy. What this line of reasoning assumes is that the activation of psychopathy will occur in the population in such a rate that the soldiers will destroy themselves in a purity spiral similar to the national blade incidents in the French revolution. As I said before, Nationa Socialism is a traditionalist political idealogy and the concept of its creation was to deconstruct itself after its own use, in which case the ends justified the means in most cases until such a time occurred. Preservation of traditional European values and people was its primary function, there would be a purity spiral in the sense that traditionalism is the ultimate form of a revolutionary idea, one which deconstructs deconstructionism and tries to reverse human progress into a more productive manner that doesn't lead to Brave New World tiers of existence.

The Holodomor happened. The Hunger Plan happened. Seeing a pattern? Also Nuremburg trials were ridiculous yes.

>And here we go with the lolbertarian/ anarchistic pathologizing of the state into a boogeyman.
Arent you the only one shouting liberal?

Germany had a core criterion as preservation of the german race which the ruling party at the time twisted to preservation of the aryan race

It will always be a what if for hitlers germany hitler went full retard and thought himself as a military genuis before the war was over so take it as a grain of salt

Please go into more detail. Googling her did nothing. What's the info?

So easy to spot the people who have been here for a month

>Venturing beyond national/ethnic borders and conquering foreign populations is what I'd consider imperialistic.
>Doesn't include a timefrm or the elimination of another people as part of imperialism

Simply ruling over a people for a given amount of time isn't imperialism. Exploitation is one of the key determinants in imperialism, and the Nazis had no plans of long term exploitation of other peoples.

>Why do you idealize the winners of the war?
I don't. Communism was obviously a failed and tyrannical ideology, and Capitalism is corrupt and in decline.

>You realize that the only account from the Nazi's that they did any harm to jews was from someone they tortured and threatened his family, right?

kek, come on bud. There are tens of thousands of survivor stories.

>You realize the whole holocaust thing was to get payments from Germany and to take their assets which are in the Fed Reserve in NY, right?

The Holocaust happened. The Holocaust has been propagandized by liberals and Israel, but it happened. The actual number killed is in dispute, but it is clear that Hitler's paranoia and violence grew to a fevered pitch around 1943, as the war started to turn against him, and he ordered the concentration camps be instead used as death camps. I'm not sure about gas chambers, but mass executions of prisoners were taking place from 1943 until the end of the war.

>Back to the food. It was about the allocation of food to be given a priority to the German people. It's not about communism, most of the people under Stalin didn't want to be in a communist system nor did any of the surrounding states.

You definitely didn't read what I wrote. One of the two desired objectives of the Hunger Plan was to kill 10 million Slavs through starvation, and thus create Lebensraum for German veterans.

>Poland? You mean the same Poles that were killing German minorities and fucking up their businesses/farms?

I never even mentioned Poland. Also

>unironically believing the Nazi propaganda about German massacres in these bordering states

There was ethnic violence against Germans in Poland, but it was not state-sanctioned and that was really the only country it notably occurred in. When I say imperialism, I'm talking about his vulture conquest of Czechoslovakia. If he was really just concerned about protecting ethnic minorities, he would have stopped at the sudetenland.

>anarchists and lobertarians are inherently liberal

No?

It will always be a what if for hitlers germany hitler went full retard and thought himself as a military genius before the war was over so take it as a grain of salt

Hitler was, in fact, a great expert of the military and genius, but not a military genius, no. The topic of Barborossa is still a bit of a mystery to me. In itself it was a preemptive strike at Stalin in order to gain traction against him, seeing as how the US and Britain had much hubris to his dependence on their aid and assumed that Hitler ought to be their enemy more than Stalin. I can't call it good or bad based on my own opinions, I'd need to hear it from the source. Except those men are all dead for the most part.

If anything, back then (((they))) had way more control of the (((media))) and (((newspapers))) because there was no internet or alternative media. If you don't believe MSM now you certainly wouldn't believe the MSM back then.

>Oh so you're on of this proto-nihilistic fags who assumes that the brutality of war can never have a catharsis and must end in a matter similar to the Shakespearian tragedy. What this line of reasoning assumes is that the activation of psychopathy will occur in the population in such a rate that the soldiers will destroy themselves in a purity spiral similar to the national blade incidents in the French revolution. As I said before, Nationa Socialism is a traditionalist political idealogy and the concept of its creation was to deconstruct itself after its own use, in which case the ends justified the means in most cases until such a time occurred. Preservation of traditional European values and people was its primary function, there would be a purity spiral in the sense that traditionalism is the ultimate form of a revolutionary idea, one which deconstructs deconstructionism and tries to reverse human progress into a more productive manner that doesn't lead to Brave New World tiers of existence.

Total and utter rubbish. What a load of rhetoric. You're hiding your core beliefs behind all of this smoke-and-mirrors language.

>The Holodomor happened. The Hunger Plan happened. Seeing a pattern?
You're missing the point. You've been arguing that the Nazi regime was not racist. It was extremely racist, especially against Slavs. The point I wanted to make with the Hunger Plan is that the German high command was not reluctantly seizing the foodstuffs, knowing that millions would die, it was an OBJECTIVE of theirs to kill 10 million Slavs, for no other reason than their being Slavs.

>Also Nuremburg trials were ridiculous yes.
Have you actually done much reading about them? Be honest. Have you read the evidence presented?

>and the Nazis had no plans of long term exploitation of other peoples.

Oh my God, come on. Do even a little reading from the diaries of the German high command. Please please PLEASE read Mein Kampf. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

Can we just ban all leaf IPs??

>There are tens of thousands of survivor stories.

Number doesn't mean accuracy.

>The Holocaust happened.
Nope. This idea of Hitler becoming increasingly irrational or paranoid towards the end of his reign is a meme in itself. The holocaust only happened in the sense that communists and their families were executed.

> One of the two desired objectives of the Hunger Plan was to kill 10 million Slavs through starvation, and thus create Lebensraum for German veterans.

Still not seeing a pattern, huh?

>he would have stopped at the sudetenland.

Absolutely not. Hitler needed whatever manpower and resources he could acquire if he truly wanted to defend Europe from communism.

Never stop fighting

Go kys

this leaf has arguments though

Literally never happened

Yes, hitler was a psychlogical and political genuis he knew what the other leaders were thinking and he probably saw the war not as a european war but a world war at the start

>Total and utter rubbish. What a load of rhetoric. You're hiding your core beliefs behind all of this smoke-and-mirrors language.
>Be a psychefag
>actually know what the fuck I'm talking about when it comes to the basic knowledge that psychopathy is openly employed in total war scenarios and that the mental stability of a unit is surprisingly dependent on such "super soldiers" in relation to moral and conformity

Not an argument. National Socialism was designed to have a purity spiral in the traditionalist sense and deconstruct itself afterwards. The purity spiral would be about traditionalism, and anyone who opposes traditionalism is objectively wrong.

>You've been arguing that the Nazi regime was not racist

NEVER argued that. They are not racial supremecists, they are simply racists. They don't want to own lands which are not German lands and they don't want to genocide every last non German from Europe to the tips of Africa on the basis that the world would be better off. Where in God's name did you get

>Have you actually done much reading about them? Be honest. Have you read the evidence presented?

History is written by the victors. Frankly whatever evidence they may have found has little to no objective support behind it.

>Read Mein kampf

Mein Kampf a shit. Propoganda =/= reality.

Get political. Run for something.

stop being disingenuous
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhineland_Bastard

This. They're objectively wrong but they are all good points. Although lets be honest other than that one professor who was banned from teaching for not wanting to use xir and whatever other Marxist hogwash in his classrooms, its (((Canadians))) for sure.

This. Its not systematic execution, but sterilization is still genocide.

Indeed. Hitler didn't come to his conclusion about the media lightly.

youtube.com/watch?v=7zv4U1NZpl8

>All together, some 400 children of mixed parentage were arrested and sterilized.
1.- This isn't Genocide
2.- They aren't even a race, they are mutts.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhineland_Bastard
They didn't sterilize based on race you fuckhead. The wikipedia is incorrect in stating that blacks were sterilized. God damn DE-nazification is strong with you guys.

So not a single jew was executed either?
not even 1,000?

That's still genocide according to the current UN definition. if you know where the definition for "white genocide" comes from, it comes from there. Genocide isn't race dependent, it is ethnicity dependent as well. These mongrelized germans are themselves their own ethnicity. I mean its literally nothing, but it is genocide.

Realise you are retarded and move on.
Try to do some actual research other than biased youtube videos with emotional music and a good speech.

200,000 or so died as far as I know.

>I mean its literally nothing
It is literally nothing, not even 500 people got sterilized.

Haha, stay cucked achmed.
Nice strawman.
It wasn't by race it was for health and psychological defects. inb4 they saw race as genetic/health defect.

i was only retorting this post I can understand denying the exaggerated figures, but claiming literally no damages is ridiculous

reddit

has the right idea

except they dont

The difference is you believe they were murdered, gassed, and burned. When in reality they died of Typhus and/or starvation during the war.

Estimated around 120,000 or something died. Look at the Almanac world population for jews before and after the war and look for your imaginary 6 million, or even 1 million.

Even the fucking red cross went to the camps and stated living conditions were good or bad, they were ok and there were around 270,000 held in camps. Camps of which had swimming pools, fucking theaters, money to buy cigarettes. It was a work /anti zionist camp, not a concentration camp.

>Haha, stay cucked achmed.
There is honestly nothing more cucked than believing everything you read on Sup Forums, and thinking that Hitler was right.

It was reinstated here earlier, if you're on here you don't believe the mass media, so why should you believe the media of the past?

What's your deal? I didn't even learn this shit on pol, here is a bunch of neo-nazi and edgey shitlords, like yourself.

not an argument

She is shitposting for Yous