Anyone wanna do my poli-sci hw? lol

anyone wanna do my poli-sci hw? lol

Other urls found in this thread:

quizlet.com/32728219/political-science-101-flash-cards/
drive.google
imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2016/06/ostry.htm
imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2016/06/people.htm
rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2016/10/its-a-war-of-ideas-not-of-interests.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

this is one of the few assignments i would enjoy doing OP so i would never take that joy away from you. have fun

I'm writing it
wait for a response

Say that labour will be replaced by robots and the rich will exterminate the poor.

"AY YO HOL UP BLACK LIVES MATTER BITCH FUCK DRUMPF"

Enjoy your C minimum.

Could you at least paraphrase the lecture that the assignment is supposed to cite?

No.
Asian>capitalism
Okay.
t. me
N/A

There ya go

This is why political science is a fucking joke.
Subjects like these are too fucking easy to be true

Jesus. Every idiot will choose Marxism. Do a commie model and celebrate depopulation.

>200 words
Holy shit, write it on the fucking toilet or something.
Be an apathetic edgelord suck-up and claim that the current system is no longer "liberalism" but instead a grotesque descendent, masquerading as free-market liberalism.
The oligarchs will maintain control, and will seek to undermine all that stand to pose a threat, including nationalism, religion, and non-materialistic values.

I hope to God that capitalism is not replaced by any other form o economic development models because at its core it ensures people will remain productive so long as they are inside of the system. If an individual does not work, they don't eat, and depending on how honed their skills are they can make more and more. This is in contrast to other systems such as Marxist markets where wages and other subsidies are preset to be given to everyone, leaving no incentive for people to work hard or pursue higher education. Here in the United States, we can s the positive effects of capitalism in the high income mobility we posses. There is a high chance that ninety percent of people in the bottom twenty percent of income earnings will move out of that bracket within fifteen years in the labor force. Capitalism is altruistic in nature, which is why it will most likely remain the dominant economic development model for centuries to come.

The past Asian nationalism approach will likely overtake 'liberalism' (aka usurious kikery) as the dominant economic model as all our countries will belong to them; when the Chinese flood in to the west and the darker Orientals (Saracens and the Poo-in-Loo people) flood the east the previously dominant economic model will be supplanted with Asianism.

its a powerpoint on how 1st world countries interfering fucked up 3rd world countries development and all the theorists that came up with reasons why.

i used this to ace the quiz lol: quizlet.com/32728219/political-science-101-flash-cards/

>write it on the toilet
He has to write it in the text box user. Learn too read

wtf? That has nothing to do with which system is best for developing countries. You don't turn Zimbabwe into Soviet Russia just because they aren't all the way developed yet. That's stupid.

drive.google (.) com/file/d/0B0Z_p8sdRDOxMUhNWmVSZ2NJV2M/view?usp=sharing

Just point to the failures of collectivism, and the individualism inherent in capitalism as the reason for it's current and future success.

Is this marked homework or something? A 200 word fucking summary of a lecture? Jesus Christ i had more in depth homework in fucking primary school.

i'm literally using this. lol

the free market (Capitalism) system can NOT last much longer

reasons
Capitalism only functions because of the large slave labor like markets of China and India

The economies of those countries are growing and so are the demand for their labor as a result

The increase in cost of labor will cause a rise in product cost

the coefficient of manufacturing cost to profit margins are already at all time lows

eventually the two will cross into a death's cross .. too costly to manufacture at profitable margins

the final nail in the coffin of Capitalism will over as a result of resource depletion

most electronics and future products will require materials made of "Rare Earth Minerals ". *note list them I don't have them on hand*
As the name implies, they are incredibly rare, difficult to mine and located in hostile regions of the world (Afghanistan)

these minerals are rarely recyclable and difficult to dispose of safely

Capitalism only functions because of the two available resources
large scale slave like labor in distant lands and mineral resource availability

neither are infinite and both are rapidly being depleted by the Capitalist system

just go full ancap or anarcho syndicalist

it's a freshman poly sci class that i need to transfer to another college cause my old uni sucked. i literally never feel like doing this bs hw

Yeah, sorry you have to go through that but that's a load of income inequality bullshit. Anyone that is worried over how much money Bill Gates has is planning on stealing money from him in the future through the government. We should all be thinking about how to pull people out of the poverty line, not how to take more money from billionaires.

Depressing this is how low even entry level university has fallen.

Assuming your parents even love you, you are a lazy fat fuck, who couldn't hack it into STEM. Get gaped by a giraffe fuccboi.

>liberalism
>aka capitalism
u wot m8

So a 200-word debate about roads?

i finished my minor in CS, just decided to go a different route for my bachelors.

you're not wrong though, i smoke too much weed.

they're using the classic definition of liberalism. it's a poli-sci thing

This.
In short I would say there has only been one development model that has ever worked and it's state backed mercantilism. I would sketch the key components of this - selective protectionism, subsidies and heavy capital controls in order to maximize technological imports - and show how they were implemented in Britain, Japan, China, South Korea, United States and Germany. I would write that the only development models that have competed were those of the socialist command economies and that liberalization destroys any dreams of development.

The future is quite uncertain, as China tries to transition and face new challenges it will attempt to mould the economies of its trading partners so we will see a rise in client states with either aggressive fiscal policies or freer finance to prop up demand, sometimes in terms of bubbles, for Chinese goods along its two developing trading routes.

>What did I learn
Nothing of value; that I'm wasting value actually.
>Would you replace it?
No. I'm leaving. By the power of Capitalism, I condemn you!

>implying liberalism wasn't developed by and always in support of oligarchy

>liberalism
>economic development model
>200 words essay
b8

Just copy and paste something Zizek said.

Classical liberalism is likely what they are referring to.

>tfw
just spent 25 min typing his work for him on my cellphone
and he skipped over it without even reading it

depending on programms and colleges, some pol-sci shit are pretty useful.I am doing that data shit for my B.S as my second major.

I'm actually debating which one my professor will like more between yours and this right now.

How do? I have not seen the lecture.

>Capitalism only functions because of the large slave labor
but thats not so

...

My economics professor would have failed me if I wrote anything anti capitalism. He was a staunch neocon who honestly believed in trickle down economics.

Here is a Marxist answer for you:
>So long as there is still non-capitalistic countries to extract relative surplus-labour from, capitalism will always thrive. This includes if we go outward, beyond the Earth, and begin extracting raw materials from other planets and solar systems. It is only until we, the workers, the people, the labourors, seize the means of production, the capital, and the land, and euthanize the rentier, the political oligarchs, and the extraordinary capitalists will we be able to properly live in a just, free, society where materialism, scientific reasoning, and futurology can thrive.

Source: Me. I went to a faggot Heterodox (aka Marxist) economics school. I literally know Marxist bullshit inside and out because I had to read him, Engels, Luxemburg (gag), and other faggot "political economists" every fucking day for two years.

It pretty much solidified me into a 100% freedom loving, liberty embracing, free market capitalist. Anyone who believes in communist faggot ideas can hang yourself.

lol i love you

>Capitalism only functions because of the two available resources
>large scale slave like labor in distant lands and mineral resource availability


false. If our corporate tax rates weren't the highest (when you also factor in the state corporate tax as well) in the world, businesses could thrive here too.

What turned you against it?

look for the "made in" location of anything you own in your house

then get back to me after .. and don't give rare exceptions like your Samsung Laptop or Tv

I've got $150 shirts , read label :( "made in Bangladesh"

the "taxes" you speak of are a way to control the excesses that would follow
and obviously to generate income for the nation

how can someone make a "profit" unless someone else is over paying

think about it
it costs me $5 total to produce product X
If I sell it for $6 that person over paid by $1

Capitalism is always extracting Value
not creating value

"profit" is all purely advertising
once the product is made , that's all the value in it

I expected to get shit on here. I can't believe Sup Forums just did my hw for me. lmfao thanks bros

you have such little faith in white men

I'm disappointed in you (but you can recover)

I always bet on my people

learn to do the same

It doesn't logically make sense. That's really it.

>Asian economic model
Sorry, but we're just winging it

>how can someone make a "profit" unless someone else is over paying

because trade is a win win for both sides and is a net gain. If I can only eat apples, and you can only eat pears, and I have 4 apples and 1 pear, and you have 2 pears and 1 apple, we BOTH gain when consensual exchange of goods occurs.

basic economics.

The Asian development model if we can say that there is a consistency /is/ capitalism so yeah that comment didn't make sense.

You're thinking too much into it.

It just boils down to exchange and utility values. Something is worth whatever a person (or the market) is willing to pay for it. It doesn't have to be a win-win situation either.

Apart from all of that, if businesses were paying people in America what they were paying people in China then you would have a revolution.

>proper spelling
No shit. What kind of retard college do you go to?

Also, how do you answer a question like this in only 200 words?

anyone wanna do my poli-sci hw? lol

Do u really need help writing 200 words?

They are just GIVING away BAs these days! No wonder why degree is useless

>liberalism=capitalism
Since when?
Unless you're talking about a classical liberal...you just got cheated out of an education homey

Okay, my car was made in America, the sweater I'm wearing right now is too, I just ate a Klondike bar which is made here, earlier I drank a budweiser, made in America, do I have to go on?

"liberal" trade is probably what the professor is referring to.

This is why poli-sci """professors""" shouldn't talk about economics and instead stick to talking about... wait, what are they useful for again?

the old "if they are willing to pay" scam

just because you can trick someone into paying more than the VALUE of it

doesn't mean it's the actual VALUE

the value is set once the product is made ... aka the cost to manufacture

the "profit" is made solely from advertising it's PERCEIVED value to the buyer

notice you've never seen the actual cost of production ever .. there's literally not 1 product you can tell me right now the actual price of manufacturing it

why is that?!

shouldn't we know how much "we're willing to pay" over the cost to produce it

your car was ASSEMBLED in America
*with parts made in Mexico, Canada, China etc
*with minerals mined in other countries
it's like assembling a model airplane kit made in China and telling me it's "made in America "

sweater was KNIT in America
*with wool from NZ etc

you bud was brewed in America
*with hops from Canada or whever
*aluminum for can mined in Chile

should I go on?

go full trad-monarchist on them OP

No, the goats whose hair is in my sweater were raised in America. The hops (and water, for that matter) are American. AlCoA produces the Aluminum for the can.

Not so sure about the car. It's a Volvo, but it was definitely assembled in the United States. I think the engine was made in Japan, and the transmission in Sweden.

>the old "if they are willing to pay" scam
>just because you can trick someone into paying more than the VALUE of it
>doesn't mean it's the actual VALUE
Yeah, congrats you realized something. But you writing this shows that you haven't studied economic history at all.

Profit maximization, utility maximization, use value, etc. came long, long after Adam Smith, Ricardo, and shortly after Marx. What do you notice about Smith, Ricardo, and Marx... oh, yes, they ponder the notion of VALUE to which they all believed in the labor theory of value.

>the value is set once the product is made ... aka the cost to manufacture
Production cost /= value in the classical sense either. Marx would heavily disagree with you on this. Ironically the statement you wrote corresponds to what manufacturers believe the value of the product is kek; which is, simply, the production cost. Firms, for the most part, just use mark-up pricing these days. That is production cost multiplied by some markup: C(1+M) = $P

>notice you've never seen the actual cost of production ever .. there's literally not 1 product you can tell me right now the actual price of manufacturing it
Corn.

>shouldn't we know how much "we're willing to pay" over the cost to produce it
You know how much you're willing to pay.

yes there are rare exceptions (I stated that a few comments earlier)

looks like your "American" car is a race mixer after all =)~

where is your fridge, tv, cellphone, home interior fixtures, other cloths, shoes made
... China, Taiwan, Japan, Vietnam etc

I hate Communism (even more than Capitalism)

but they are two sides of the same counterfeit bill

M8, I'm going to be straight with you now that I've read all your previous posts; you need to get a higher education. Or do you think university is mind control programming too? You obviously have an interest in the field but your comments are cringe-tier high school level.

I've literally never read a word from Marx
and yet I know communism always fails because there's zero incentive to improve efficiency and production

Capitalism is 1% above Communism because it gives a perceived incentive to improve efficiency and production

America has been under a capitalist system for 250 years
-it has had the benefit of natural resources
-literal slave labor and pseudo slave labor from a Communist State (China)

and yet it's almost never had a surplus longer than a few years
currently at 20 trillion debt
standard of living below socialist countries
millions homeless
75% households negative net worth

but hey "if the goyim are willing to pay"

Value is set
Profit is theft

simple as that

and you said corn?! fucking corn?!!!!

wow, just wow .. how much did your shoes cost to manufacture
tv, phone,
in other words everything else other than corn
that had to be a troll
please don't tell me it was serious

are you the guy that told me his car was American

with fucking foreign parts?! yes or no
cringe on that

economics are fundamental
I've lived under communism and capitalism

pencil to paper ain't shovel to soil
you're just like the Harvard and Yale geniuses jumping out of their Manhattan apps in 2008 after market crash
the days of your enjoying of the labors of Chinese slaves are ending

your slave Negros bit you in the ass
and soon your Asian slaves will take a bigger piece

the jew will cut the string to their puppet and tie it to the new powerhouse China

>liberalism is capitalism

fuck off

can not be said any better than than

There extends a long history in regards to capitalism. The concept has existed for centuries and remains the predominant system in terms of economic systems. For the United States, the system has remained for as long as we can remember and it has remained for many reasons. Some of which are good and some of which are bad. I truly believe that we, as a society, have become so reliant on this system that we don't know anything else. The American Dream is flooded with the idea of trying to find the quickest and easiest way to establishing wealth and to some, they may feel as if that is the right approach. But to some, this economic system has ran it's course.

Do I personally think that capitalism will or shall be replaced? Possibly in time, but not in the near future. There are too many globalist figures in the world and even in this very country that will not allow that to become an idea. Or even a concept. So in conclusion, capitalism is here to stay for now until economists can prove that another far superior system can take over with a completely smooth transition.

Going to college is a meme

You can't even find a goddamn plane and you wanna talk about economics? Fuck you.

Literally a Marxist psyop (like Vietnam War prisoners had to write pro-Communism papers)

Whoever you are, sage and just

> If you're not a shill, then write about how fascism is inherently superior and more humane

Neoliberalism is dead, cite this imf article and be done with it.
imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2016/06/ostry.htm

This is the most likely scenario.

This.

It seems that this university wants everyone to fucking apologize for how dominant capitalism has been throughout centuries and brainwash faggots like OP into thinking that there's a positive alternative such as Marxism or Eastern Economics

>if you believe in liberalism (AKA capitalism)
>liberalism (AKA capitalism)

Jesus fucking christ drop that course

Drop the fucking university too.

OP, where do you even go? A libarts school?

Something something automation something something robot wars.

topfuckingkek

I swear, when I was taking business and finance courses, we never had to do stupid shit like this. But the world wasn't so goddamn PC like it is now.

If you don't read this you are missing out. IMF literally says opening up boarders to free flow of cash destroys economies and austerity measures used to run down a deficit are senseless. It's pro nationalist reasoning that predicted many things that happened this year

>boarders
Maybe you need to go back to school, leaf.

Wouldn't help my kind.
imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2016/06/people.htm
>Harvard professor who has been saying that globalism has been failing for many years, was ostracized by his peers, and vindicted this year

Fuck off you commie and come back where you came from.
The capitalism extracting value instead of creating it is pure bullshit.
The only reasonable point you made was the scarcity of resources, everything else is retarded.

Basically predicting why Hillary lost. No narrative, stuck only with the base.
rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2016/10/its-a-war-of-ideas-not-of-interests.html

>americans actually do 200 word essays

I thought it was just a meme.