Daily reminder to listen to William Luther Pierce's radio broadcasts on youtube

Daily reminder to listen to William Luther Pierce's radio broadcasts on youtube

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=INdW5HxyCFc
youtube.com/watch?v=eWuAH3P9s1k
youtube.com/watch?v=qMIqoMwa2Sc
youtube.com/watch?v=sTy3mJZXf_0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

He was an even bigger faggot than WIlliam Spencer

Agreed.

>>>/lbgt/

who?
:P

And you're a bigger leaf than the both of them combined

hwites

itsh the kike'sh

The (((alt-right))) and memes were a mistake. Fuck Murdoch Murdoch for how they presented Pierce.

I'm a non-regressive lefty. Alt righters are merely occassional allies of convenience.

Leftism, by virtue, is regressive.

You do not understand politics. Read more.

Post his best video.

Exactly. They're OUR 'useful idiots'.

youtube.com/watch?v=INdW5HxyCFc

Explain then you stupid faggot.

>Alt-right gaining popularity resulting in greater exposure to racial realism, nationalism, the JQ, etc.
>"Fuck the alt-right they aren't true WN's they are too successful and mainstream"
Hello renegade.

>most Sup Forums thought sits somewhere around here
ah ah ah no.
Most of Sup Forums thought is at the left of Jared Taylor.

...

youtube.com/watch?v=eWuAH3P9s1k

One of his best speeches

...

Time to head back to plebbit kids, the election is over. Or stay and get redpilled, makes no difference. You will come around to our way of thinking whether you want to or not.

Back to Ribbit desu senpai

youtube.com/watch?v=qMIqoMwa2Sc

Also haven;t you seen their recent video? They brought Pierce back and redeemed him. They also commented on TDS how they had moved further to the right after making the video where he was gassed.

The problem is that the alt-right has no leadership nor general consensus so you have people like Milo that get associated with it. It's as meaningless as "Far-right" in so far that it is a literally just describing a counter culture "right" instead of standing on it's own as a third option. It has no real meaning or standing and thus is easily manipulated.

The alt-right isn't an ideological category. The ideology of the alt-right is far right.

This
youtube.com/watch?v=sTy3mJZXf_0

You realize Murdoch Murdoch is at best satire and at worse subterfuge, right? It's pretty fucking clear. Just like that Emily Youcis cunt, she's managed to weasel her way into Red Ice and went to the NPI conference that was a few days ago. She's clearly making fun of the "alt-right" or whatever it's all supposed to be.

Reported for linking to CP on YouTube

Traditionally the left was considered "progressive" in that they were forward-looking, and promoted policies with the goal of a new, improved society better than any which had gone before.
Traditionally the right considered some past or the present state of affairs to be the ideal and promoted policies aimed at restoring (reactionary) or preserving (conservative) that ideal state.

They're not absolutes or inherent btw, just general rules of thumb

Anyway, the regressive left is the segment of the left whose policies, deliberately or as a side effect, actually promote a return to a prior societal state, and promote values not considered "progressive". For example defending Islam despite its significantly negative value systems.
They are exemplified by the SJW and Feminist left, though not limited to those categories.

That part of the left can go get fucked. They're more dangerous than the right at the moment.

No they were basically right, we need a popular front right now to bring down globalism.

And yet if you listened to the droves of civic nationalists and "classical liberals" that associate with it you wouldn't get that. The far right MUST have form and structure, that's the whole point.

George Lincoln Rockwell was far superior desu

alt-right is anything that isn't mainstream conservatism in the United States, again it isn't an ideological category

What the fuck are you on about?

A little too LARPie for my tastes but I respect the man

Which contradicts what you just said in the previous post

The problem is that you have to have a REASON for opposing it

Not everything is the goddamn kikes

no because they are also from the far-right, simply not the mainstream far-right

WHAT BOOKS SHOULD I READ TO EDUCATE MYSELF NIGGER

Doubt it is satire, they have done AMA's and spoken on alt-right podcasts and they seem pretty genuine. Their level of dedication would be strange if they were just satirists.

That is my favourite Murdoch Murdoch vid.

The bit where Pierce gives the Yoda speech made me firm in the trousers.

Classical liberals are far-right? kek

That wasn't the question. I was answering "Explain".

I'm not a fucking librarian. Go find out.

You really don't understand how satire works, huh?

no classical liberals are not from the alt-right even if some of theme identify as such

same thing with libertarians btw

Hmmmm

Libertarians might theoretically oppose it for different reasons than nationalists, but nationalists should work with them against the common enemy instead of undermining them to maintain ideological purity. Those differences can be settled after the beast has been slain.

LOL DUMB NIGGER I BET YOU CAN"T EVEN READ

The organic nature of the Alt-right is what has made it so attractive. People don't go full fash straight away, they move from Gavin to Molyneux, to Ramzpaul to Jared Taylor to Richard Spencer to Red Ice to TRS etc. The "redpill" is a slow transition. The fringes and watered down areas of the Alt-Right are what cause people to be sucked in.

but libertarians and classical liberals are part of the mainstream conservatism in the United States the alt-right is anything that isn't part of the mainstream

You have no proof they are satirical, they just use humour to get their message across. Stop being such a blackpilled faggot and go back to renegade.

That would make using Sup Forums, a text based message board, rather difficult wouldn't it?

Idiot troll.