(((((((((((((((Stein)))))))))))))))))

This is just a money grab right? Surely you can't buy a recount?

Also, she said she would rather Trump won than Hillary so something is a bit (((odd))) here

She is scamming people

If anything she is probably looking to find that Hillary was rigging votes.

The Green Party doesn't need to get rid of the Republicans to become a mainstream party, they need to get rid of the Democrats.

>insane cash grab before fleeing the country

Go Jill go!

>The Green Party doesn't need to get rid of the Republicans to become a mainstream party, they need to get rid of the Democrats.

Hmm, very true, didn't think of that.

That would be good. Because the only people giving her money would be leftists anyway, so it's like an extra "fuck you".

They're trying to steal the election.

All the money is going to the same place all the Sanders donations went.

wrong pic

of course

listen just keep denying reality and stay in your bubble like everyone else here and nothing bad can EVER happen to you

but Trump's gone

-you can ask for a recount if you pay for it
-most of that money is from the Hillary campaign
-Jill Stein was bribed by them to push for a recount after they spend the past two weeks rigging the votes
-the recount will show Hillary actually won and the Trump win was the result of Russian hackers, the election will be stolen from Trump

Fug

why not recount the hillary states instead?

That would be sexist goyim

You know if they just stuck to the facts and didn't ramble so much, this would be a much more credible picture.

I don't doubt that it is true, but you also have to remember that there is no obligation on anyone to actually do a recount if the vote margins are outside the automatic triggers.

Also, it's not entirely correct. Michigan has paper ballots, BUT they are counted by machine. The machine is just a big computer that you feed paper ballots into, it scans them and then a mysterious number comes out the other end - which is supposed to be the tally of votes, but could literally be anything.

It is possible to hack Michigan but there is NO WAY that any computer scientists could have any evidence of that without actually having access to the machine's code or the physical ballots.

Pennsylvania requires

1. A margin of .05 for a mandatory recount

Trump exceeded 1% so that's a no.

2. Prime facie evidence in court

There is no evidence by their own admission. So that's a no.

3. Three individuals per county to file petitions prior to the cutoff.

I'm not sure about that.

The person who fabricated the study (and gave CNN ammunition for their Fake News coverage) works for a non-profit that specialises in election reform.

Jill Stein said in the message on the fundraiser that this money perhaps won't be used for recounts, but instead for funding efforts to reform the voting process.

Well, Michigan already did a recount. Result is pic related. Penn has Trump ahead by 1% or more, meaning a recount won't be allowed.

So there's just Wisconsin left. Good luck, Jill!

Because Trump won.

The group that started the campaign initially went to the Democrats, and apparently received a mixed response (some, like Podesta, were eager, others like Clinton supposedly, were less interested).

So they turned to Stein, who said she would not do it initially, but agreed if the financing could be met.

The alleged "study" does not cite the counting machines. It cites the specific Voting Machines utilized in Wisconsin.

It then says these same machines could be hacked in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

Except Michigan doesn't use those machines.

The numbers they offer as a sign of an anomaly that "suggests investigation" are false too, as shown by Nate Silver.

The response was;

>The numbers quoted were wrong

They also weren't computer scientists. They were lawyers.

This

Also, she's doing this to get HER name out there in 4 years.

Bloodsucker.

chill the fuck out

This is a publicity stunt for the green party, she's getting MSM attention

if there was 1% of Hillary Winning, her many pacs would spend 100s of millions of dollars for recounts

>everyone hating JILF
>because counting to Trump winning twice would do anything
>because IF they successfully flipped a single state there wouldn't be lawsuits until the end of President Trump's 4th term

Yeah, she SAID she'd rather Trump when but you also have to consider the fact that she's a bitch.

but if trump won and she endorsed him why the hell would she bother

I'd still give Jilf a good dicking.

>No legal information on the fundraiser page.
>No mention where the money goes or who would manage the trust.
>Fundraising for a thing that every state would shoulder itself if there would be a reasonable amount of doubt.

It is just commie logic
>money is the root of all evil
>we have problem, quick throw more money at it