Brianna just learned about Operation British I'm assuming.
Spacegate
>nukes are way cheaper
And also far more reliable and less likely to hit the wrong target.
>From my understanding isn't there a lot of helium-3 on the moon?
I've heard as much. Until we develop fusion rocket engines, it ain't much of a propellant.
SHE DELETED IT AHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
Water ice hydrolysed using photovoltaics would probably be the best fuel to gather as of now
Does he not know how large the moon rocks have to be before they could survive through the atmosphere and do some actual damage? On top of that, good luck calculating the perfect trajectory for a fucking ROCK to hit some specific target.
There are plenty of realistic to "weaponize the moon", and all of them include nukes.
>standing on something while in free fall
>no tether
He could have magnetic boots.
The good news is I already live in a basement.