Koranic Law

so why should we help them disengage from a toxic term?

any sandnigger can confirm??

You liar. The Koran is like their version of the bible. The HADITH is where the laws come from. The Jewish equivalents are Torah and Talmud

Sadly most westerners only know about the Koran/Quran. Muslims study 3 books. This is why Islam is not a religion. One book is laws including Sharia, one is religious, the last is a biography of Muhammed. Together, the three books make a system of governance and religion.

How is changing the name going to make any difference at all? Everyone who isn't a Muslim dick sucker already knows that Sharia law is pure cancer, how is changing the name going to change anything? Please explain it to me, because I feel like I'm missing something.

EVERY muslim will spell it Quran, i don't know where the narrative of spelling it like 'koran' ever came from, i know for a fact its mostly used by non-muslims though.
sandnigger here, the difference between sharia law and 'koranic' Sharia law can be interpreted from many sources see here while 'koranic' law is from the quran only

Sounds nice.
I will start saying that in my comments in mainstream media

>their

jej
lend me a kebab, user?

>We shouldn't, but they will deny they support sharia law as practised by "extremists", they will say "that's not the Islam I know". They don't have much to lose by disavowing "sharia law" that is not "real Islam". Normies don't understand where sharia comes from, the various sources like hadiths. Muslims exploit people's ignorance of Islam to portray themselves as more moderate than they really are with taqiya. But a Muslim won't willingly disavow Koranic law because that is explicitly rejecting the Koran. They have to affirm it. It makes it harder for them to do taqiya. Muslims hate defending hadiths so they will usually pretend that they don't follow the violent and disturbing aspects of sharia law. Much harder to do that with the Koran.