prove me wrong
protip: you can't
Prove me wrong
Adrian Miller
Other urls found in this thread:
innerexplorations.com
innerexplorations.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
youtu.be
twitter.com
Eli Powell
Virgin pastime
Chad timekiller
Jaxon Kelly
Make a point so people can prove you wrong next time
Kthx love you bye.
Thomas Nguyen
>not both
ywn be a true /fitlit/ warrior poet
Jace Lee
Funny how the Itiocracy effect is gonna mean they evolved without reproduction organs
Chase Bell
There is no such thing.
Either you're fearless worldly practical nigger/sandnigger, or you're sensitive intellectual deep creative neurotic Jew.
The latter is more evolved than the former.
Women are attracted to unevolved men.
Adrian Adams
>implying anyone who's intelligent would be concerned with physical appearances
>implying weight lifting = healthy
Blake Butler
they're both still in man's current form.
both are evolved, both have a ways to go.
Aiden Sanders
That's not what this is about. Lifting weights doesn't change you from the second man to the first. Neither does not lifting weights change you from the first to the second. It's in your genes.
Connor Myers
>everybody's equal
no. Just because they're the same species doesn't mean they're equally evolved. The first is identical to the common ancestor thousands of years ago, the second is a lot different.
Chase Reyes
>exercise connected to more white/grey matter in brain
>people who exercise before a test score higher
>chemically happier
>chance of survival/replication much higher
List goes on, you get the point. Start your day off breaking a sweat, get those pheromones all over your body, and do your homework cuckold faggot
Kayden Lewis
how does that contradict the post you replied to
Jeremiah Gomez
I said evolved, not more likely to replicate. The more evolved you are the less likely you are to replicate. The picture isn't about exercising and reading, it's about body type and temperament.
innerexplorations.com
Jordan Murphy
you can read and also lift weights
crazy concept I know
Brandon Brown
see
Justin Wilson
also evolution isn't real in its contemporary sense
Henry Adams
...
Brody Kelly
I'm saying what you talked about and what the post you replied to talked about isn't what the topic is about. It's not about reading, exercising, caring about appeareance, or caring about health. It's about body type and temperament.
innerexplorations.com
Aaron Sanders
For the last time. It's about body type and temperament.
Levi Sanders
>innerexplorations.com
shit website
>endomorph - ectomorph - mesomorph
debunked
>body type and temperament.
why not phrenology while at it?
Landon Bennett
William Sheldon said body type is associated with temperament.
Joseph Watson
the ectotonic temperament, which is associated with the ectomorphic body type
Brandon Hill
the mesotonic temperament, which is associated with the mesomorphic body type
Caleb Kelly
So the ectotonic are beta faggots and virgin nerds?
Landon Phillips
*tips fedora*
Easton Carter
You see in black and white because you aren't very good.
You think you have figured out "the secret" because you're of inferior intellect and are attracted to easy solutions.
Everything about you is wrong.
Cameron Wood
>implying weight lifting = healthy
Yes
Hunter Gonzalez
Enjoy becoming decrepit in old age with your evolved body.
>i've fallen and I can't get up
Robert Brooks
Why do you believe that William Sheldon is right? Especially since body types don't exist. They literally don't. There is only muscles, posture and fat. All of them can change in a lifetime.
Aaron Sanders
Yeah we got it. You're a soft and frail virgin of a faggot and you're seeking out ways to justify being ok with it.
Ethan Hill
I haven't looked into his methods or evidence, only his proposition. And it corresponds with my own observations. Body type is as real as height and shoe size.
Xavier Martinez
ad hominem
You clearly don't know and understand even the most basic parts of argumentation.
Jeremiah Lewis
btfo
Joshua Sanders
>I haven't looked into his methods or evidence
Then you shouldn't believe he's right. For your information he looked at picture of naked people and believed that the body type dictated behavior. His research is discredited by modern research. Behavior dictates the body type. Someone who plays sport is going to be muscular and extroverted, someone who spends all his time at the library is going to be less muscular and introverted. Behavior modifies muscle and fat level, not the other way around.
>Body type is as real as height and shoe size.
Height and shoe size does not change. Fat and muscle change. One is fully anchored in genetics, the other isn't. Therefore one predicts genetics, the other doesn't.
Ryan Walker
Your bullshit argument has already been ripped apart by multiple people in this thread so I don't need to argue anything. I'm merely pointing out your motivations for posting it in the first place.
Logan Bennett
Yeah, I know what he did. I'm saying I haven't looked into his raw data. Body types are real. You can only change your body within a very limited range which is determined by genetics, even muscle and fat.
Ryan Adams
Why are there horns on his stationary bike?
Benjamin Kelly
>Your bullshit argument has already been ripped apart by multiple people in this thread
I haven't posted a single argument. I've posted theses.
>I don't need to argue anything
then don't post
>I'm merely pointing out your motivations for posting it in the first place.
a) you don't know anything about it, but can only assume
b) it's irrelevant to the topic
c) again, this shows you don't know anything about argumentation
Bentley Scott
Nathaniel Scott
>You can only change your body within a very limited range
We can literally double our body mass or cut it in half. Not over a lifetime, over a single year.
Jeremiah Lewis
Chase King
>I haven't posted a single argument
>prove this illustration wrong
That's an argument that we're supposed to argue against
>then don't post
Fuck off. Don't post stupid shit if you can't handle the responses.
a) you don't know anything about it, but can only assume
Apparently neither do you because you can't argue against the people who clearly do
>b) it's irrelevant to the topic
It being irrelevant to the topic is irrelevant. It's relevant to you personally.
>c) again, this shows you don't know anything about argumentation
Ad hominem. Also irrelevant to the topic.
Nathan Hernandez
Doesn't disprove the existence of body types. For mesomorphs the middle finger and the thumb when wrapped around the wrist of the other hand just barely touch, for ectomorphs they overlap, for endomorphs they don't touch. No exercise or lack thereof nor any diet or lack thereof change this. That's an example of what body type means. Body type doesn't mean you can't change your body in certain ways with diet and exercise.
Hudson Ross
>That's an argument that we're supposed to argue against
No, it's a proposition, a thesis.
>you can't handle the responses
I pointed out that ad hominem is not an argument and not relevant in any way to the topic. You don't know even the most basic parts of how argumentation works.
>you can't argue against the people who clearly do
I've pointed out that this isn't about exercising. The only thing people here have said is you can be big and muscular and still read. That's not what the topic is about.