Fuck this guy

...

"libertarian"

seriously fuck this guy. irrelevant clown. but to his point: what do they mean by "conversation"?? it's the same thing as "common sense" when it's applied to legislation on guns

why not have a common-sense conversation that every single gun-crime stat and graph the jews pull out is a product of our violent nigger epidemic. there we go. but oh, libertarianism doesn't comment on race, does it?

>says literally nothing while trying to sound profound and cheap deference to both sides
I don’t even know if there’s anything to get upset about here. It’s devoid of content. It’s not a statement, it’s just a statement about statements.

I'LL VOTE FOR GARY JOHNPSON BECAUSE DRUMPF IS A STATIST

Why is it that EVERY FKN TIME someone want's a

>CONVERSATION

It is always, without exception, some anti-white shit?????

why?

>(((libertarian)))

the truth is that there is no discussion to be had about the second amendment because the second amendment is not something that is up for debate. it's something that people will literally form a militia and rebel against the government to defend. it's the point in teh US where "if you take these guns from us we will literally turn on you and go to war against you". i mean, i'm not trying to be seditious here, but i'm pointing out that that IS the mentality.

now the "libertarian" party stands for what? "opening up a dialogue on gun rights"? and "opening up our borders to mexico and south america?"

why is that none of these policies are going to lead to me being free? they're going to lead to me being enslaved by my government and demographically replaced.

right wing libertarianism is a great thing, but that's a far cry from what the "libertarian party" represents these days.

(((Libertarian)))

Worse than a neocon