Fuck this guy

...

"libertarian"

seriously fuck this guy. irrelevant clown. but to his point: what do they mean by "conversation"?? it's the same thing as "common sense" when it's applied to legislation on guns

why not have a common-sense conversation that every single gun-crime stat and graph the jews pull out is a product of our violent nigger epidemic. there we go. but oh, libertarianism doesn't comment on race, does it?

>says literally nothing while trying to sound profound and cheap deference to both sides
I don’t even know if there’s anything to get upset about here. It’s devoid of content. It’s not a statement, it’s just a statement about statements.

I'LL VOTE FOR GARY JOHNPSON BECAUSE DRUMPF IS A STATIST

Why is it that EVERY FKN TIME someone want's a

>CONVERSATION

It is always, without exception, some anti-white shit?????

why?

>(((libertarian)))

the truth is that there is no discussion to be had about the second amendment because the second amendment is not something that is up for debate. it's something that people will literally form a militia and rebel against the government to defend. it's the point in teh US where "if you take these guns from us we will literally turn on you and go to war against you". i mean, i'm not trying to be seditious here, but i'm pointing out that that IS the mentality.

now the "libertarian" party stands for what? "opening up a dialogue on gun rights"? and "opening up our borders to mexico and south america?"

why is that none of these policies are going to lead to me being free? they're going to lead to me being enslaved by my government and demographically replaced.

right wing libertarianism is a great thing, but that's a far cry from what the "libertarian party" represents these days.

(((Libertarian)))

Worse than a neocon

yup, sadly.
libertarianism can really be a good thing, but there is also (((libertarianism))), which is the cultural marxist variety of libertarianism (which gary johnson is a part of)
hollywood and the music industry played the (((libertarian))) card in the 80s and 90s in their war against the religious right. they only wanted to deconstruct the values of our country. they won. once they won though they did a hard turn from libertarianism to leftist authoritarianism, which we see today.

good example is sarah silverman, who famously went on bill maher to defend the right to make racist jokes, and got into a pretty heated debate with some minorities over the issue. she played the libertarian card to win americas heart. once her people felt secure in their domination of the US, they turned on a dime to authoritarian.

that's the future these democrats don't realize they are creating. they're just getting conned. they always get conned.

I always hated Gary Johnson but this is too far. The comments underneath must be astroturfing because no real libertarian can be this much of a faggot... can they?

I guess they can, but still. Ron Paul wasn't perfect but he was better then this faggot.

I seriously regret voting for him after this.

You can cry all you want about guns, I'll die to defend that, but it literally says "shall NOT" in the seconds verbiage.

Can we just accept that Gary is a plant used to make Libertarians look stupid and destroy the party and movement from the inside? Voting for Rand would have been a way better vote than for this loser.

> the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Uhh... Not a lot of room for discussion

Here's my "conversation": America was built on gun rights. If you don't like it, you can get out

These cretins are why I have distanced myself from lolbertarianism.

>voting for no borders
Kill yourself.

he'll blow a toke in your face after he disarms you and smirks under that long semitic nose and dropping jewish septum

drooping*

There is nothing to debate, no conversation to be had. By sitting at the table to even have the conversation, we are losing ground. If we sat down and demanded automatic weapons be made legal then it would be worth it. Until conservatives grow some fucking balls they just need to push them away and say the 2nd amendment will not be touched.

Okay Gary, so tell us why it happened.

Make the FBI release evidence.

Then we can have an open conversation.

It's really simple 2nd amendment is a canary clause of the constitution. If it goes we are legally allowed to take arms against the tyrannical government.

Dude is legit a double agent, wtf

>FBI
they're like small time. I don't even believe the "he was an FBI gun runner narrative"

if this is indeed a falseflag/hoax then why wouldn't they just give us this guy to throw us off when we know it was had to be done by multiple shooters?

protip: the conspiracy narrative parroted by alex Jones is just as bad as the MSM

Butthurt ancaps are completely irrelevant

Testing

somebody ask him if he knows what's Aleppo yet. my guess is no.

I have an idea. Let’s make it illegal for the FBI to run entrapment operations and then lie about it after they fuck up

>entrapment operations
like the Daily stormer?

Yeah it's okay to ask questions, but when the answer is obviously "no" you have to accept that too.

>every single gun-crime stat and graph the jews pull out is a product of our violent nigger epidemic.
See, this is the ultimate problem with the left: they aren't willing to admit that niggers have a violence problem so they won't challenge talk like this with actual facts, they'll just try to shame you for even bringing it into the conversation.

Whereas I am free to tell you that yes, niggers are violent savages, but even if you removed every single one of them from the US the murder rate would still be twice as high as it is in any other western country.

Better yet.

Let's make it fucking illegal for fucking LEOs to do fucking illegal shit.

So tired of watching cop cars parked in red zones blocking fire hydrants backwards setting speed traps!

Fuck him for what?

He managed to say exactly nothing at all in three paragraphs.

>what do they mean by "conversation"?? it's the same thing as "common sense" when it's applied to legislation on guns

Those are just meaningless, neutral-sounding platitudes to lend credence to their irrational policies on controlling gun violence, which they can't do. They've proven over and over it isn't possible, anymore than these morons can control drugs, or alcohol in the early 20th century. It never works.

And good fucking luck having a "dialogue" with people about a subject they know nothing about. Most libs have never fired a gun, much less could identify things like barrel shrouds, stocks, etc. which they want to regulate. They're imbeciles all around.

No, they can do that one

I mean with weapons. All the time they are luring autistic retards into deals where they think they’re buying a bomb or whatever and then arrest the person on the spot. It’s a wonder that this is the first time they’ve obviously fucked one up

I'm not interested in having dialogue with the fuck white people left. I want them destroyed.

The only way they can win is by making the truth unsayable.

>It's really simple 2nd amendment is a canary clause of the constitution.

This. By removing or modifying the 2nd it removes all authority from law enforcement and the military. The government already has infringed on gun rights, therefore all police and military and federal agencies are illegally operating in the USA.

>The government already has infringed on gun rights

this is true

>requiring a drivers license to obtain a fundamental RIGHT
>banning fundamental rights that fire automatically

yeah but everyone knows having an "honest conversation" would be eminently easy. you just have to talk about niggers.
the battering ram being used by jews to fuck this country over. all you have to do is name them, in a COMMON SENSE DIALOGUE about gun violence

you really, really have to take a step back on this if you're a boomer or a libertarian or a muh constitution type. you absolutely must examine your premises now.

I usually hear it mentioned in reference to muslims and terrorism...

Well it just means that if blacks want to commit black on black violence, they'll use guns and continue to use them because most of them have guns illegally, even though guns are a fundamental right and should not be illegal, according to the 2A

>asking how it happened before you even understand WHY it happened
That's right. Jump straight to the end without examining any of the information, or in this case lack thereof.

Libertarians ARE fucking stupid. Did any of you watch their fucking debate? It was clown show...this faggot is the best they can do. "Third Way" my ass. Burgers are a fucking mess.

Looks fine to me, it's just lip service to save face and not be called a monster or whatever. In the context of having just stated that liberals need to recogonize we do in fact have gun rights in this country revival of the gun rights debate is basically him saying "our stance is unchanged, we can do this song and dance forever for all I care. We are keeping them, fuck you."

exactly

The answer to Why is the MSM

Libertarian lol

Libertarians are just communists who want low taxes

He's literally retarded. Watching him on JRE made me realize this - and Joe is fairly fuckin retarded himself. It was extremely cringe. Never been a libertarian really myself (proper anarchist, none of that gay shit)

>Whereas I am free to tell you that yes, niggers are violent savages, but even if you removed every single one of them from the US the murder rate would still be twice as high as it is in any other western country.
That's where you're wrong, kiddo.

>Twitter found Trump's convention speech to be the darkest timeline
Can't even use memes correctly

It always amazes me how safe some shit holes are.

Gary “what is alleppo” Johnson is the reason I abandoned libertarianism and moved to the far right.

>the libertarian party represents libertarians

Typical leaf

me too, and here we are, in Canada.

It doesn't really matter, we're fucked either way

(((Libertarian)))

Based Leaf

>fuck this guy

My thoughts exactly.
Surprising coming from a leaf about a guy that sells trees.

>to let such a tragedy pass without politicizing it would be foolish

Also, aleppo

Libertarianism was conquered by leftists a long time ago. That's the price they payed for being "inclusive".

Yeah fucking inside-Jew to fuck up the party, nice way to get rid of competition.

>its time
>we need to have a conversation

typical leftist infiltrator
he should face a libertarian firing squad

when i was in high school i used to look up to guys like this and considered them smart. guys that sounded reasonable and tried to look for common ground to see that everyone walks away happy. now i think guys like this are just spineless fags that dont have the balls to take a position on anything so they just pander to all sides. even the foundation of libertarianism is built on is "let's just let everyone do whatever they want as long as their not hurting anyone". but fuck all that. i dont want my daughter using the same bathroom as a 6'5'' 300lb dude wearing a wig.

conquered? wtf are you talking about? "conquering" a political philosophy? you sound dense. people can still have true libertarian views regardless of leftists "conquering" it

Actually false. We'd be safer than most of Western Europe if you eliminated the niggers.

are you stupid? This is typical jew lawyerspeak for "we're gunna take your guns"

yeah. why is that piece of shit calling for mutual respect and mature dialogue.

yea why dont he go suck my dick
can shut that stupid nigger dicksucking mouth up

a l e p p o

"conversation" only means "it's time for you to permanently change your way of life because jimmy kimmel rubbed onion juice in his eyes a few days ago".
"conversation" only means "you must now cede ground that we will never return to you".
"conversation" only means "shut the fuck up and do what we say".
when these people tell you it's time to have a "conversation", what they really mean is that the time for conversation is already over.
when these people tell you it's time to have a "conversation", what they really mean is that it's time for you to start openly killing them, because they've removed all other options.
the time is now.

>pol
>conversation
lol

Let's force regulations to make all hotels have reinforced bulletproof glass windows. It is necessary to protect people.

>invests in related glass companies

GUN OWNER!?!? GUN OWNER!?!? AS IF THE GUN DOES NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BE HERE!?!? GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU NAZI REEEEEEEE!

>queue that picture of hillary talking about "gun control" then the jew jumps up with the thing on the back of his head or whatever right in the video

>I'm a libertarian you guise!

i know gun owner's more like slave owners am i right or what guys like this

these are all women, or at least, female-brained

it's like when your girlfriend tells you "we need to talk"

>any other western country

>The US has more killings than other 1st world nations, abloo bloo bloo, it's all whitey's fault
>How dare you build walls and laws to keep out 3rd world economic refugees, you racist

Pick one, pronounkin. Do you want to live in a first world country, or not?

(((Librarian)))

reply to wrong person?

Libertarianism reduced to dude weed lmao

>reply to wrong person?
Probably.

Get aids and die in a fire Gary

"Libertarian Party" are a bunch of lefties LARPing as Libertarians. Most of the actual Libertarians are in the Rand Paul sect of the Republican Party.

good posting friend very good. i love it.

>presidential candidate doesn't know all the foreign cities
How is he supposed to bomb them flat if he doesn't know where they are? Just pick spots at random?
At least Obama could find on a map the hundreds of thousands of brown civilians he was killing.

Its easy to say for the average joe that he and his friends will band together and over throw the government. But lets face it they wont. They and their buddies will get together sure, but are they going to outperform the army? I think not.
If the government said tomorrow guns are illegal there would be 50% of Americans who were against that. Out of that group how many would willingly die fighting an army in splitered groups no larger that 50. 5%? 10?

How long would it take for them to be wiped out and how much would the other 50% of Americans support the government strong leadership and getting rid of 'gun nuts'.