Human rights

Gallica sunt, qui amiserint

Averte pedem tuum Victus

Tu plenus muslims

Puer es, sed cui mundi visum est unrealistic

rights are plastic, they're just a fancy name for rules or laws. human rights can cange at the stroke of a pen. the only concrete law is the law of nature

I don't agree with censorship but for the rest, i consider that its reasonable. Rights should stop where they begin to infringe upon those of others and when they begin to become self-harm, so yeah

From what I see, much of the Alt-Right are very strict constitutionalists. For how dated it is, the constitution covers 99% of all bases.

The Left however view it as a draconian document that is alterable and should be interpreted in the very loosest sense of the words.

Those are not rights at all. Rights are not substance, rights are the ability to obtain substance.

e.g.
>Right to travel - Where there is no danger to person or property, a person shall not be prohibited the right to traverse public lands.

You have no right to force me to stay alive if I do not want to. People like you are cancer.

ostende mihi faciem tuam vexillum

don't hide behind meme flag

I sense a contradiction here

think about it this way
>you have the right to food
>guy gets hungry and decides to steal an ear of corn
>farmer has right to protect his property
>attacks the man who has right to bodily integrity
>who the has the right to defend himself
>and kills the man who has a right to life

rights are a faggot term used to assure the mass of retards that they are safe and protected. you can base a system on morals which express themselves as rights because rights dont mean fuck all nigga and are inherently flawed

> can
>can't*